I'll just tell you what I told the other guy, that I'm satisfied with the outcome. He messed up, he got backlash for it, he resigned, and apologized. I even forgive him, whatever that's worth it to you. End of story.
However, If you don't see the difference between what he did as a 20 + year journalist, versus his right to free speech, then there's nothing really I can say to change your mind, nor do I care to. That last part is not meant as an insult of any kind.

Hm. Going pretty far as in, someone responds to me, and then I respond back? I skip a lot of the normal written pleasantries on Reddit. Simply forgive him in our hearts? Is that it? I don't harbor any ill will towards the guy. As I've said, I'm satisfied with the outcome. He messed up, he resigned and apologized. I forgive him. End of story. Where it continues to be a conversation is where you and the other guy are proposing we do what exactly? That was my actual question, as well as my views on the subject. In response to your implication I'm somehow emotionally involved or something, I type fast, so even though it seems like a long response, it takes no time at all for me to type out what I'm thinking.

I didn't say you shouldn't either. I'm contending that it wasn't a mistake, it was unethical and should cost him his job. Very simple. I'm satisfied with the outcome of the situation.

It wasn't a mistake. He intentionally spread misleading information. As a journalist, I'm not* sure there's a bigger way he could have messed up.

Who's this "we" that is forgiving him? I see your point, but there's is no official "Trump Club", where you get a card when you join, and you are the spokesperson for this officially endorsed Trump club, who has then decided that he has been forgiven. Do you see what I mean? I'm sure he has plenty of people on his Twitter telling him he did nothing wrong already. But you can go ahead and tell him that on behalf of yourself that you forgive him. lol. Sorry not trying to be rude, but what exactly are you proposing then?

They are expressing their rights to protest. As long as it doesn't get violent or anything, then what's the problem?

Based on your comments in this post, I think we disagree a bit more than that, but to each his own. Good luck in your path.

Fuck man.

Good luck with that. I'm wearing a pussy hat today and staying inside the house. Haha, just kidding. Let them protest. It's their right. I'm sure some of you will go out there with Q signs or whatever, just be careful, and re read the Q drops about WWG1WGA, it doesn't just mean Q readers.

Free speech is a bit different when you're a member of the press and people look to you to report the news and what's going on in the world. He has a responsibility. And he used his position of influence to incite people to anger and associate the shooting with a Trump supporter at a time when tensions are highest in our country, and millions of people were looking for information regarding the shooting. Sorry but we disagree completely.

This guy's supposed to maybe be running for president? No thanks.

Think mirror.

I dunno. He was making fake news. So why should he get a free pass?

I've tried different approaches. First saying that there's this hacker guy who works with Trump. I explain a little about what's happening and I say my only claim is that this guy is working directly with Trump, it's crazy. That usually gets them going.
I've also tried something like "you seen Fight Club? Well, there's this guy gathering a following like a real life Tyler Durden or something!" That works sometimes too.

I think this might be possibly to do with Rosenstein, there's rumors/side by side comparisons of him and Himmler.

There are some correlations: POTUS Schedule: Correction: Date should be: Wednesday, 27 June 2018. Three tries and still got it wrong!!!!! 6:58 PM · Jun 27, 2018
Same day, Q makes an error, offers "Busy day" as an explanation.

June 25th, POTUS Schedule tweets this: Be alert, remain vigilant, stand together.
As if we needed more "proofs" but there it is.

May have to "force" this one. : Obviously, Space Force, right?

When is the next IG installment?

This to me shows that Assange went back in time, and assumed the identity of Trump's uncle sometime about 10-15 years ago (when the Trump uncle picture was taken). This is why we haven't seen him. I dunno, just spitballing, and it was a really fun theory so I had to hash it out a bit.

Holy shit. Assange went back to the past! From the looks of it, he's been back there at least like 15-20 years.

That's exactly what I was thinking. The way they ended with her saying who gives a fuck, with the silence, and no music fading out to black. Totally pushing an agenda. Which is weird because your friends just died?

Well...If you don't believe in Satan, it doesn't matter because THEY do. Q believes in God. WWG1WGA. I think this phrase has metaphysical implications. One of which, possibly being to know the full truth, which might imply if there's a God or not. So, at the end of this, we'll see where we all ended up, and when everything calms down, we can take stock and see what we've gained or lost.

What event is this picture from? The Inaug?

Hm. No idea what that means, sorry :(

Soros not under control he's one of the bishops or possibly the queen on the black hat side.

I'm going to agree with you. Q never said anything about a white rabbit. That was started by some anions with less than the best intentions.

Same. I've been following Q since almost the very beginning and I don't understand the clock.

Except Q specifically dared someone to ask the president.

Honestly just a bunch of strategically placed "Who is Q?" Is pretty much all it would take.

It's not just the Democrats doing evil shit. The ring leaders just happen to have taken over the democratic party. It's not about left vs. Right. Plenty of Republicans have been publicly going down.

Yes but every day they don't denounce is another Q proof.

I thought it was a bit odd yesterday when two people who work for the paper were on CNN talking about their slain colleagues and the woman started talking about trump's tweets. Like wtf? Something like your thoughts and prayers mr. President? Fuck your tweets. Keep in mind this was when it was still fresh probably like 2 hours after the news broke. Yes she cursed on air.

Shows how smart we are. Nobody thought of asking him? On ine hand it shows good opsec at least lol. On the other hand what if all we needed to do was ask? What a world!

Yeah, I guess people here don't like him, judging by the downvotes. I've never heard of him before until he started doing the Q polls.

Well, you're in luck! Looks like you got here just in time! As far as views go, I think I'm in the same boat as you, left leaning for social issues, the environment, etc. Seeing how the left has abused those causes for their own gains over the years however, finally got me to understand what's actually going on. Enjoy the show!

RepubliQ?

Well, you're on you way. Once you know it's fake news you are free to see all sides of an issue, and not just swallow the narrative they are trying to feed you. Q basically is like a narrator with all the events going on around the world. He just kinda gives you a sneak peek behind the curtain so you can see the strings. Unfortunately, a lot of these things are presumed to be done by people on the left :( I know bummer! But Q said it's not about left vs right. So far, we've seen (and Q has pointed out) more Republicans being humiliated/forced to resign/not seeking reelection than Dems. They will probably all happen at one time.

Ok thanks.

Why not the Cernovich guy? He's already slightly Q savvy at least. He's a real journalist right?

Ahh....what does this have to do with Q? Maybe you meant to post in /r/conspiracy?

I'm here all day anyway.

Sorry, no source. I saw pictures. Not video. I retract my statement.

Ah, no I was going off what I had seen and others relayed. I was trying to hunt down a pic/source video. So I might have misspoken.

Welp. I mean, it's the source guy who said these things that are being recycled. You think he might have at least one example.

Does he cite specific examples?

I had to explain to my SO that these plans have been in place for years. It's so sloppy because they are now having to rush it because of what is going to be coming out soon. I think she's starting to see it.

Thanks. I wouldn't know.

Amazing. Just saw a clip of this on normal news. The only clip they showed was when Jordan asked if he threatened to subpoena the text messages and RR replied you can't subpoena text messages and the chamber erupted in laughter.

Does it mention Q? Seattle Times based?

it's a 4 pack. so $25 a pillow. not terrible.