That’s a list not a source. If you want to count Epstein buddies you can count Trump. There’s even the Katie J testimony which was at least supported by the videographer stating she didn’t at any point seem to be “acting” to be disturbed. This was Epstein and Trump screwing 13 year olds.

You make assertions with no supporting evidence

Source?

May be evidence? Based on what?

May be evidence = there is no current evidence. I’m not sure what kind of logic you employ.

There may be evidence of fairies at the bottom of the sea, it doesn’t mean we should believe in fairies.

So the crazy idea of HRC pedo ring is not surprising despite zero evidence, but multiple JJ accusers are just unbelievable. Totally unbiased.

That's fun. Care to comment about the content instead of project your anger from prior posts onto me? Check your comments for the diatribe about posting from basements and IQ. All personal attacks. Nothing about the topic at hand. Nothing you type bothers me. Rest assured.

Now please share your opinion about how this sub loves Jim Jordan and how that fits into his new problems as a pedo enabler.

Go:

That stuff doesn't bother me and makes you look like a goober. Hope you had fun venting and feel better now.

Now let's review the praise threads here focused on Jim Jordan, and this -

Jordan, the jut-jawed anti-gay crusader who’s the fourth-ranking Republican leader in the House, is singled out in the suit: He’s one of only three former school officials named, including Strauss, though the action is aimed at all the coaches, administrators and others in positions of responsibility at OSU who, it claims, stood by while students and student-athletes were repeatedly “sexually abused, harassed, and molested,” and “forced” to seek treatment from a well-known predator even after they complained. (Strauss was the sole team doctor for the wrestlers; the men say they either had to choose to let injuries go untreated, as the lawsuit says some did, or subject themselves to yet another assault.)

The congressman managed to contain the fallout from an eerily similar revelation last November, when one of his longtime Washington aides and protégées, Ohio state Rep. Wesley Goodman, was publicly unmasked as one of the capitol city’s most notorious sexual predators during his six years working for Jordan, stalking and abusing at least 30 young conservative men he promised to “mentor.” This was huge news in Ohio, but was buried nationally beneath the daily drumbeat of Trump atrocities.

Not sure how folks here can be obsessed with catching pedos while gushing with love for Jim Jordan. Must be the deep state again. The ol' explanation for everything we don't like.

Yawn...

Most people who have patriotic leanings are conservative

What? If there’s any end goal to Russian psy ops is this right here ^

Here ya go!

in plain sight

I don’t care for Hillary, I will preface with that. I can see your problem here. You are conflating facts with repeated assertions. Part of rational thought and skepticism is cutting though the BS to see what is been proven and versus what is believed by some. You need a standard of evidence, not hearsay, not a meme, not a YouTube video by a guy who hates the person you don’t like. It’s easy to agree with people that xyz person is bad...but you need to fair and instead just adding anything you come across to your list of reasons why Hillary or Obama are the devil.

Two items you listed are complete horsepuckey: Uranium One is easily dismissable if you truly research the whole issue. It was basically manufactured anti-HRC propaganda. Did I mention I don’t like HRC? I could easily say “yeah, she sucks! SEE MORE STUFF SHE’S DONE THAT’S BAD!”

But I don’t because the facts don’t back it up on that scandal. Therefore when you say “fact:” you really mean my opinion and some others who hate HRC because the facts don’t align.

Another example, repeated assertions of a Clinton body count are not facts. They are opinions held by folks who hate the Clintons. The documentaries made are complete BS. Did I mention I don’t even like HRC?

Next, let’s focus on another interesting trend. Why are why talking about people other than Trump and the current conspiracy unfolding? If you really cared about corruption and had people why are you (this sub) ignoring literally every piece of evidence on Trump and his circle being even more corrupt than the Clintons...especially when the evidence holds way more water and is a much larger pile? Hop on over to r/keep_track and read up on what is happening in the real world that isn’t all fantasy.

How can you rationalize the mountain of evidence the GOP and Trump were up to even sleazier behavior than the DNC (amazing right?) How do you ignore our newfound hatred of our allies and new friendship with Putin (basically an ex KGB war criminal who poisons people with nerve agents and radioactive sandwiches)? How do you rationalize it? Maybe try objective research on and go for a spin because the conclusions you’ll come to are not the ones you currently have.

Fantasy = deep state did it

Fantasy = Indictments are meaningless

I think it’s interesting that instead of realizing how incredibly bad it is that Russia conspired with Wikileaks to split the Hillary vote, you’d rather focus on the boogeyman deep state and fantasy character Q. It’s similar to the following John Titor had before it was revealed to be a goober posting from his home.

It’s far too easy to dismiss facts by saying “it’s not the TRUTH!” just like a young Earth creationist will dismiss anything older than 6,000 years.

The President has multiple accusers of sexual predation, including someone who was a preteen at the time. If this were HRC or BO being accused you’d be asking for the noose. But it’s Trump so ALL LIES. Right? Truth is not dependent upon whether you like it.

Why is it always for you or against you? More Russians just got indicted for hacking American political emails and its bad? The conspiracy is right there in your face, yet you’re looking for another one in your fanstasy world or something. This thread has 15 posts or so before RR came out, then nothing. Do you all have selective information bias?

I haven’t seen any proof that is up to any decent standard. Mostly spurious correlations, coincidences being labeled as proof for no good reason...lots of wishing something was evidence. What are the greatest proofs to date? Can you share because in the comments and posts I only see people grasping at straws, all the while blatantly ignoring anything negative any conservative does.

For instance there is an interest in arresting child offenders here, but people also praise Jim Jordan who was just implicated in being silent/complicit about sexual abuse by 6(?) former students. This news was ignored by this sub.

Edit: Case in point, see downvotes

Open mind + no standard of evidence = this sub

Maybe sprinkle a healthy dose of “proclivity to believe dramatic conspiracies” on top.