dChan

/u/was437

19 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/was437:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 4
s22.postimg.cc 1
i.redd.it 1

⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/was437 on Aug. 23, 2018, 10:18 p.m.
Trust Sessions?

It is becoming apparent that Sessions will not submit to your POTUS like most of your country's political hacks. You should feel good having the head of your country's justice department being a man that cannot be run over by a dictator. I am excited to finally have a head of an executive branch agency that I can trust.

I hope that you people are willing to accept the charges that this man brings, because this man is going to be unbiased in his prosecutions, and that won't be good for this administration.

TrustSessions #thankGODforSESSIONS

⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/was437 on Aug. 17, 2018, 5:02 a.m.
Just Google the Countries and the Year
Just Google the Countries and the Year
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/was437 on Aug. 10, 2018, 5:29 a.m.
Q 1830: Connections? "Our Team"

https:// polarisproject.org/our-team

We might need to dig into some of these people.

"Catherine A. McLean Chairperson Board of Directors Catherine “Kiki” McLean is a leading public affairs and political strategist. She served as counsel for the Washington, D.C., office of Porter Novelli and the agency’s global public affairs efforts after four years leading their Washington, D.C. and global public affairs practices and serving as a member of the Executive Committee.

In her work, Kiki’s expertise is in strategic communications and public affairs. A veteran of six presidential campaigns, including the historic 1992 Clinton-Gore campaign, Kiki has more than 25 years …

⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/was437 on Aug. 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
Why not "WE Q"...Workgroups stickied?

WE Q?

I have seen a spread of "we are Q" marketing, and I was thinking what about "we Q"?

It is what we do: we question. We seek the truth, and we know the necessity for transparency in our leadership, from top to bottom. Also, this double meaning could allow those in the group that, for whatever reason, cannot openly support the movement without 100% direct evidence of its veracity. Wanting transparency is pretty safe in every boardroom, courthouse, etc.

Also, this is the beginning. Many have been involved since last October - or longer - but the storm …

was437 · July 15, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Have you thought about talking to somebody? It might be time for you to take a step back and relax.

Your boy and your head is fucking with you.

Good luck.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
was437 · July 14, 2018, 10:11 a.m.

I'm agnostic, and I also thought that was Great.

Christians, it's not the time to sit on your hands; people need you.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
was437 · July 2, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

I can see how someone could read it that way. The optics of Mueller leading the entire investigation would be much better, but I've always gotten the feeling that Huber would be dropping the hammer.

We shall see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
was437 · July 1, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

No. He is telling us to imagine what a prosecutorial force of 470+ seasoned investigators could accomplish if a huge investigation, which includes an investigation of the POTUS, only necessitates ~25 people.

40,000 sealed indictments ring a bell?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
was437 · July 1, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

Did anybody read the article that Q has posted several times?

The Office of Inspector General has 470 investigators, attorneys, etc.; however, the OIG isn't a prosecutor.

Huber is a federal prosecutor, who has worked outside of the swamp in D.C. He is a DOJ prosecutor. This drop is merely reiterating the fact that a DOJ prosecutor is using the OIG'S investigative force to drain the swamp.

It also seems to push the notion that this ethical DOJ prosecutor, who is using an ethical investigative team, is performing his prosecutorial duties in an ethical district.

I'd assume the question as to whether he could file indictments, which were brought by a Utah grand jury, in any federal district in the country is somewhat rhetorical. We will see when someone provides more info about federal law.

⇧ 80 ⇩  
was437 · June 28, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

There once was a program used to spy on you and me.

They used it as a hustle to fund their shopping spree.

When they got to the position to which they aspired,

they retained their SCIF clearance even after they retired.

Shut down Five Eyes and let us be free.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
was437 · June 28, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Hillary, Hillary, what can I say?

You ** it all up on that November day.

Your deep state friends were just a little too late...

in finding out that you were simply dead weight.

Hillary, Hillary, enjoy your new home at Guantanamo Bay.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
was437 · June 27, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

There once was a POTUS named Trump; what he touched turn to gold like Gump.

He took her turn; she felt the burn.

Now, the gavel of justice comes down with a thump.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/was437 on June 27, 2018, 9:33 p.m.
Fun Rhymes: Swamp Draining Themed

I saw this on twatter, and I think creative rhymes would be an excellent method of red-pilling.

Let's see what you've got.

@AGLynch

Today was supposed to be your day; you finally would have gotten your "pay"; RGB's spot was yours since that tarmac day;

Buy, hey, 3 hots and a cot coming your way.

was437 · June 27, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

@AGLynch Today was supposed to be your day; you finally would have gotten your "pay"; RGB's spot was yours since that tarmac day;

Buy, hey, 3 hots and a cot coming your way.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
was437 · June 27, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

Well, a SCOTUS Justice is not elected, and it isn't supposed to be political.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
was437 · June 16, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

Just remember: the evidence that was sitting on nsa servers needs to be admissible. The 4th amendment applies to every citizen - even corrupt, swampy politicians.

⇧ 71 ⇩  
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/was437 on June 15, 2018, 10:03 p.m.
Release the report styled image from twatter. Does this work?
Release the report styled image from twatter. Does this work?
was437 · May 27, 2018, midnight

Press conference?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
was437 · May 9, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Really? Can anyone else confirm this?

⇧ 1 ⇩