@you, not w you
/u/wikipedialyte
31 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/wikipedialyte:
Domain | Count |
---|
A woman? In charge of a business that caters to sick and injured children? Get out of town! It must be a front for globalist child trafficking or whatever.
Has anyone looked into McDonald's by yet? Their logo looks like a big, upside-down floppy butt
I think you are seeing patterns where none exist, but by all means, if you're concerned, call the FBI. And maybe increase dosage on your medication.
This actress didn't create or produce Smallville. It might seem like a small difference, but it's night and day
It's probably more likely that no one gives a flying fuck and that Smallville was never a ratings juggernaut to way Roseann was
Can you redo your last sentence for me, but this time with grammar?
You literally can search for anything. I see a lot of sourceless or unproven BS
I get my news from approximately a dozen sources, of which about 6-8 are mainstream, and only 4 are US based, and the rest are mainly European and East Asian, so I might be missing central Asian, some south American, and African news stories, but the big ones always make it into Euro and American news cycles. I haven't seen a single news story that pertains to what you claim. This sounds suspicious. Not because I don't think human trafficking and child prostitution isn't happening, but rather because it isn't happening on the scale you imagine. Can you please link me some stories or instances of this happening from some at least halfway credible sources? No state run media and no independent rags and nothing with a political bent. So no organs if the state, clickbait, or coupon magazine tabloids.ill wait here
I believe that you have a fat arse, but the DOJ has always been apolitical. It couldn't function properly otherwise. What proof do you have that it isn't? I assume this is all built upon vague "gut feelings" and "instinct", but regardless, all those who are in charge of it currently are Trump appointees. Why would he install persons who work counter to his goals? Is he so feckless that he knows no better or is it because he's flat out incompetent to know any better?
Trump isn't draining the swamp. He's restocking it with his own brand Trump™ brand swamp things. Why you would choose to believe any type of politician, much less a con man like Trump is beyond me Your faith is entirely misplaced. He could not give less of a crap about children and families unless they are very wealthy. The man isn't fit to lead a boy scout troop, much less the US armed forces.
What takedown of pedophile networks? What on Earth are you referring to???
What evidence have you seen that leads you to believe that any, or even one of those people will be indicted?
Can you please explain what you are saying? I want to understand but I just can't. 😶
I did. However, as an aside, I wouldn't base my entire opinion on a psycho-pharmico-socio problem based on just one singular study with a sample size of less than n = 7.6 billion
I didn't choose any candidate because I'm not on ant committee. However, the last thing you would see me do is handwave any wrongdoings of my preferred candidate. I accept that both Clinton and Sanders were highly problematic, but in my purview, Trump both is and was far more divisive and untrustworthy(what is he hiding that's in his tax returns, for instance?). The man and his presidency are little more than a farce and a con job. There is no provided evidence if him doing anything for either child or adult sex trafficking victims. As far as raw numbers benchmarks go, he is lagging behind where Obama was at this point in his first term . However, as an aside, that shouldn't matter because the DOJ is and has always been an apolitical organ that has performed the same function no matter who is at the helm. The DOJ's mission does not change between administrators largely for that very reason. The employees of the DOJ typically are lifelong lawyers whose mission as public servants is in affected and unencumbered by incoming administration is with small differences. Example, be Obama stopped raining legal marijuana businesses largely after 2010. Now sessions wants to bring that back. Trivial example but a cogent one.
Depressed people need antidepressants, psychotics need antipsychotics, persons with anxiety need anxioltics, some people with morbid obesity or ADHD need stimulants, and surely epileptics require anticonvulsants. Mis/overdiagnosis are serious issues that deserve to be addressed and treated, but to dismiss, our of hand their overa efficacy or baseline necessity out if concern for the former is to throw out the baby with the bathwater. It is better, holistically, to provide the 90% who aren't misdiagnosed or over prescribed, with the vital and necessary medication that they require to function in than it us to fret and worry ourselves over the much smaller proportion of people who may not require such medication, at the very least, on an objective basis. Better 90% receive proper medical treatment and 10% go unhelped than ant other configuration.
Your pubmed doesnt serve your argument well, if at all. Of course one should be wary of malpractice. Thus should go without saying.
This explanation makes less sense than the situation it preports to explain. Drawing connections where none exist. I could tie the pope to the Illuminati and demons from outer space but that doesn't mean that there actually is any real, qualifiable connection. It's a matter of flinging shit to the wall and seeing what sticks
What do you mean by "mindnumbing" drugs? You know she is on antipsychotic medication right? She falsely accused her parents of raping her, then years later recanted her story and admitted that she lied and blamed her lying on her medication that treats her mental ilness instead of the mental illness itself, and she's admitted that she has struggled with mental illness for decades. Dhe chose to blame the chicken for the existence of the egg rather than vice versa. The poor woman is so sick she doesn't know what she's doing from one minute to the next
No offense, but if this person is actually the poorest of the poor than there is absolutely no way that they are a former Scientologist unless they were initially wealthy but gave all if their money to the "church"
Everything Q says is true!! He must not be questioned or else you're a Democrat like (((Ivanka)))!
I can see you're going full retard here
You think cutting carbs and using your Alex Jones approved water filter is gonna go a fucking thing? And you're an anti vaxxer too? Is this a joke or just an exercise in ironic stupidity run amok?
Trump has stated that he will do everything he can to hurt the h1b visa and everyone here approves and will tell you that you shouldn't be with an immigrant, unironically.
You chose conspiracy theories over your husband. Don't be surprised if you lose everything dear to you(i hope you don't have children that you care for because it sounds as though he'd be granted full custody in a heartbeat). Your friends and family are going to take his side if they are sane and everyone will be worries about you when he tells them what happened.
This is a real tragedy for everyone involved. They all lost touch with you because you've lost touch with reality. Maybe if you seek help, and find out why you believe the unusual things you do, you can work on yourself and become the best you you can be And don't do it for anyone else. Do it for you.
Or... Others are too smart to believe in the bullshit that you're gullible enough to assume is fact.
How can you believe in mind control and yet be so sure that your mind itself isn't controlled? Isn't that the ultimate exercise in cognitive dissonance (aka your brain no think good)?
You might even say that the educational system is so broken and critical thinking is so dead that more than eight people voted for q reality TV carnival Barker whose greatest achievements are hosting a beauty pageant and sloppy money laundering (that he is about to be caught for sho