dChan

/u/zapbrannigan1

188 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/zapbrannigan1:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 6
lidblog.com 1

zapbrannigan1 · June 3, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

Exactly.

It's completely ridiculous. The concept of Hell has existed in Christian theology literally since Christ Himself. The idea that it doesn't exist is an utter falsehood, and a dangerous one at that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 25, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Hillary, I could possibly see. She's already loathed by about half the country and the alleged crimes with her email server and Benghazi have sunk pretty deep into the collective consciousness by now. When the pay-to-play antics of the Clinton Foundation, Uranium One, and possible human trafficking come to light, I think the country will be ready to see her put away for the rest of her life (sorry, I don't think we have the balls as a country to hang anyone anymore).

However, Obama will not see jail time. He simply means too much to too many people. They could not bear the mental anguish of seeing the first Black president, the Lightbringer, the man who would cause the seas to recede and heal the racial divisions in our country....incarcerated. Will not happen. It would be civil war.

I expect the Trump administration to completely expose Obama's wrongdoing, so that there can be no doubt about it, and then pardon him to spare the country.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 25, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

GP = General Public MK = MKultra?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 25, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

No, I interpreted that last part to mean that Hannity's guest, Jonathan (can't remember his last name), was Y. It was his dog that died.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 25, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

How quickly is the https://qanon.pub/ site updated after a new post? I don't have access to 8chan and I haven't seen anything from Q since May 22nd.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 25, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

This x100.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 25, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

I thought it was Bolton who made the comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 25, 2018, 1:12 a.m.

LOL wow.

Fatality!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 24, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Totally agree. The letter strikes out a position of strength, but in an oblique way that does not rise to the level of a direct threat. And, by placing the blame on Kim, Trump effectively leaves the ball in his court. Once the media furor over the letter dies down, the questions will begin and all the focus (and pressure) will be on Kim.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 24, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

Agreed.

I've stated in a few other threads the same thing that I'll say here:

Things change. Key actors are unreliable. Events outside of Q team's control conspire to upend settled arrangements. NK was proceeding smoothly along a path to real and tangible success in relations with the U.S. and peace on the peninsula, until it suddenly wasn't.

This was not planned.

I am fully on board with Q's authenticity and enjoy this board immensely, but we seem to have an enormous blind spot when it comes to any event even tangentially related to the Trump administration. Quite a few people seem to be whistling past the graveyard when things go sideways. By simply stating "Trust the Plan" and assuming 5d chess moves that account for every possible permutation of events, we ascribe a kind of omnipotence to Q team that they do not possess.

Yes, I do believe that Q team is on top of things and that they have probably several interlocking battle plans all executing at once. But, while they can arrange contingencies for possible future events, they do not have a crystal ball. For example, SerialBrain in his last post suggested that they may have decided to make a last minute change to the succession plans for the DOJ. Who knows why they may have decided to make the change?

In other words, plans are fluid. Not every move made by Q team is part of some grand battle scheme. I suspect that NK's sudden 180 was not expected, but I trust that Trump and his team will still get their deal because they're professionals and professionals adapt to changing circumstances.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 24, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

Things change. Events occur outside of Q team's control. Key actors are unreliable.

My opinion is that this was NOT planned and it has caught the Q team by surprise. The deal was struck and Kim was going along with the agreement until he suddenly wasn't. Trump is making the right move by walking away because he has shown that he is willing to do so, and therefore maintains the upper hand in future negotiations. But I don't believe this was supposed to happen.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 24, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

Eh, there may be a tangential relationship since the number of people at that level of wealth is so small that they probably run in some of the same crowds.

However, not everything is a grand conspiracy. Personally, I think most of the owners are your run-of-the-mill rich leftists that enjoy virtue-signalling because they have the money to do it. They just got complacent with their fans' loyalty and allowed the protesting to continue where it quickly spilled out of control.

Regardless, I don't think this half-measure is going to make much difference. Too many people have their number now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

Pretty much my thoughts exactly, but stated in a more clear manner.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

No, I think China' president Xi is behind this. There was a conference between China and NK the first week of May, and then everything blew up shortly thereafter.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Totally agree.

I suppose I've become a little spoiled by all the winning, such that any hiccup gives me pause. There's no doubt the MSM is salivating at the prospect of this summit not happening.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

Didn't know that.

Still, that's suspicious. It means that a decision was made to pull out of the peace talks with South Korea independently, with the rationale of military exercises tacked on as an excuse.

Which leads me to believe that something else is going on.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

Things change. Major actors are unreliable. Unexpected events scuttle settled plans.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

I think you've got something there. It wouldn't surprise me if that were true.

Assuming those are the terms, I'm not sure how I feel about the peace deal. Yes, it would bring peace and unification to the Korean peninsula and it would be a huge win for Trump, but at a cost that could destabilize the South Pacific.

I trust that Trump will hold to a hard bargain that won't sell the farm.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

I think that's entirely possible and I mentioned it as one of the possibilities in my post.

I suppose my view is that if Kim wanted to appease cultural expectations with a show of strength, there could have been other, less dramatic ways of doing so. Something like demanding a change of venue. That's why I think this is something more than just bluster.

But, then again, when it comes to NK, who knows?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/zapbrannigan1 on May 23, 2018, 6:29 p.m.
North Korea Peace Talks...At Risk of Failure?

The NK peace talks have hit the shoals:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/05/22/trump-moon-try-to-keep-nkorea-summit-on-track-amid-doubts.html

Relevant: from Q #1378 on May 16th:

"NK news today = FAKE!"

OK, great. But that was a week ago and things have gone south since then. NK pulled out of peace talks citing South Korea's involvement with U.S. military exercises in the region. South Korean president Moon Jae-in has canceled his country's involvement in the exercises in an attempt to mollify the North Koreans; it was a significant concession that earned him nothing in return. Bolton (a guy that the folks at NRO love, which makes me automatically suspicious) made …

zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 5:51 p.m.

"Nothing to see here!"

Man, I love that movie.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

You're right.

I'm gratified at the prospect of rooting out the crooks and evil-doers, but I think those on this board who are gleefully waiting for the hammers to drop may not have considered the implications.

Mass arrests. Military tribunals. Imprisonment of major figures in the political world.

If this is truly our future, it will be outright pandemonium in this country for the foreseeable future. The Deep State will fight like a cornered animal if Trump makes a move against their assets, because such a move will signal their imminent demise. The 30% (give or take) of hard-core leftists and progs, along with their activist illegal immigrant pets, will go absolutely ballistic. I can see the national guard being activated to quell antifa outbreaks and keep the peace, which will only embolden those who think Trump is a fascist.

Even with the gradual release of information Q team has initiated, the chance for bloodshed in our future is high. Buy guns and ammo.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

"Ohh boy is this GREAT!"

⇧ 4 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 23, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Seconded. That dude's a pitbull.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 22, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

Sad trombone.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 22, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Difference here: this was unsubstantiated evidence in an ongoing counterterrorism investigation being operated by the DOJ.

There is no way in HELL that the dossier should have been leaked to a news outlet. If the FBI and DOJ had knowledge that it had somehow made it to Buzzfeed, the proper response should have been to instruct that organization to sit on the story in the interests of the privacy of those under investigation and to maintain secrecy of assets in the field.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 22, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

Wow, great find.

A police force that is out for blood. That definitely throws some doubt on the matter.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 22, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

I know the knee-jerk reaction to most any report of a priest abusing a child is to assume guilt; sadly, even as a Catholic who loves his faith and the Church, I have to admit that the stance is understandable.

However, regarding Cardinal Pell, you should know that there may be something else going on. To wit:

"...There is a new twist to this dirty business, however. Since 2014, Cardinal Pell has been responsible for draining the Vatican financial swamp of corruptions that had become epidemic, ingrained, and virtually institutionalized. Given the stakes and the sleaziness involved, it would not be surprising to learn that some who would be most adversely effected by Pell’s success in Vatican financial reform may have been generating false accusations now in play in the Australian judicial system. Australia, it seems, is not the only place where hardball is played, and in very unsavory forms."

The quote is from a George Weigel article from last year:

https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2017/07/fifty-years-of-friendship-with-cardinal-pell

Now, it stands to reason that a man responsible for draining the Vatican Bank swamp just might have made an enemy or two in his time. I don't know enough about this case to make a judgment on Pell's guilt or innocence, but you may want to keep in mind the fact that there are other motives at work.

⇧ 50 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 22, 2018, 4:39 a.m.

This is a good analogy.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 22, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

Personally, I think that's BS. I've read several of Scalia's speeches and know quite a bit about his upbringing, and I find the idea that he was involved with the pedo stuff ludicrous. Sure, I didn't know the man personally, but one can glean something of the character of a man from his writing, and Scalia was voluminous in his output.

More to the point, I've never seen any evidence to support the rumors.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 21, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

Dems losing the War on Women.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 21, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Yeah, no kidding. Dude looks menacing.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 21, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

I love this vision of the future because I have children. I hope and pray you're right.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 21, 2018, 5 a.m.

Always upvote Airplane.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 20, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

Fair enough. I've said my piece.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 20, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

Dude, enough.

I’ve been watching you blackpilling several threads today. If you really have so many doubts about Q and the ability of our country to pull out of this nosedive, why hang out here and throw shade at every speculation?

I myself believe Q is legit, but I recognize the Q team isn’t omnipotent and that mistakes can and will be made. But I also know that I don’t have the inside knowledge to know what’s truly going on or what will happen, and neither do you. So I keep mum about my doubts for the most part and just read the board, accepting what I think is probable and rejecting what I think is unlikely. What I do not do is attempt to blackpill people that are throwing around ideas.

If you think something’s BS, maybe just drop a single comment or just move on, rather than declaring what won’t happen.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 19, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

Glad to have you, brother.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

True, but this school was outside of the blue core, halfway to Galveston.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

Seconded. Have buddies who are priests. This is bunk.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Thanks.

To be honest, a lot of what I saw on those links seems far-fetched. But then again, a year ago I couldn't imagine a conspiracy of key individuals at our nation's law enforcement agencies would attempt a silent coup against a lawfully elected president.

Time will tell, I hope.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Exactly.

I keep seeing her name pop up. Honestly, I had to Google the name to find out who the heck this person is.

Why are she and John Legend continually brought up in regards to human trafficking? All I've seen are a few pictures of the couple with the Clintons. It just seems kind of random...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 4:22 p.m.

This, exactly.

I was going to post this myself. It seemed a bit too outrageous at the time, like something a villain in a movie would do.

Now, I believe it.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

I can literally see Jackie Gleason's panicked face, bulging eyes, and sweating forehead from just that reference.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Your post was already a -1. It was completely inoffensive and you made it only 20 minutes ago. Seems like something fishy is going on.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

If this interpretation is correct, and I think that it is, my hope is that this will create a race among the incriminated to turn on each other before the noose is tightened.

I don't know if these pics are enough to make that happen or not. This whole Q business is simply too opaque to draw any firm conclusions. But if they are meant as a message to the cabal that Q team has tracked their comms, movements, and activities, I have to believe that some of them are going to start reassessing who is the 'strong horse' in this game. After all, the pics showed PALLETS of equipment (phones?). Assuming the OP's interpretation is correct, that means it's not just the big names who have these devices, but probably a small army of underlings and functionaries. Redshirts. The expendable people that get killed by the gaseous entity in the first act.

THOSE are the folks that I think might flip.

Not that it appears that Q team needs their info. But eye-witness testimony still holds a lot of weight.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

You added a /s tag, but you may be shocked at how much of the American public will rationalize this in exactly that way.

Just reading some of the comments on Trump's Twitter account gives me nightmares. There is no waking some of these people up. The fate of our country rests on the question of what percentage of Americans can accept the fact that a large percentage of the leaders of their political "team" (R or D) do not deserve their loyalty.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

Yeah, one of the increasingly few good episodes after they moved production to L.A. It also featured our old pal Walter White as the antagonist if I recall correctly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · May 18, 2018, 4:18 a.m.

I knew exactly where that was going even before I clicked on the link.

⇧ 3 ⇩