Board rules:

>no spam - this includes posting over and over that you think VQC is LARPing with no evidence, or trying to derail any of the general threads with irrelevant information

That's pretty much it. You're only going to get banned if you seem to be intentionally shitting up the place, and if that's the case we'll try asking you to stop first.

This thread is dedicated to the way the board is run. If you have any suggestions about how we should do things, or you think any other posters are causing trouble, feel free to discuss it here.

AA/ArchiveAnon is the board owner, and he can be privately contacted at thebuttonnexttocapslocktwice@protonmail.com. We would all prefer if you would ask about things on the board so that everything is public, though. If you think I'm doing a bad job of running the board, don't hesitate to mention why so I can stop doing whatever I'm doing. If you think I've become a tyrannical dictator and that I'm not listening to your criticisms, the nature of this website is such that you can start a new VQC-related board, and our community is small enough that you wouldn't have any trouble convincing everyone to join you if they agreed. This board is not about me; it's about the collaborative effort.

There is also a /vqc/ Discord server. Ask Topol either in RSA general or his EZ Bake general thread if you'd like to join. This Discord server is strictly for off-topic conversations and half-baked ideas that we don't think are worth posting here on the board. We are all dedicated to making this a public disclosure, so if you think some of us are plotting behind closed doors, you're welcome to join the server and post screenshots to the board.

The End

>>200

Anything specific you want me to put in the OP? I haven't been "baking breads" as they say so I don't know what else to put.

>>272

>chan

It's a board on an imageboard. "Chan" isn't a noun.

>>731

>>737

>>755

This is the meta thread. This is where people go to talk about board moderation. If you want to make a thread, you're meant to go to 8ch.net/vqc/ and post in the post box at the top of the page. That'll create a thread for you, if you weren't already aware.

I got a report for a tripfag who hadn't contributed anything. I don't know why that would constitute a ban. If anyone would like to suggest or discuss any rules, please do so.

>>962

Let me pick these apart for the sake of refining them (not for the sake of personal attack):

>annoying cunt

That's subjective. Rules need to be completely objective or it'll be up to my discretion, rather than reflecting the intent of the rule in other people's minds. What aspects of the posts you find annoying make them annoying?

>gay

I'm not 12 years old anymore so I don't know what that's meant to mean if you're not referring to homosexuals. Define it, as above.

>posts that only contain irrelevant images should be at most 1/20 of the posts in the main thread

Picking an arbitrary proportion of posts to tolerate doesn't solve the issue of irrelevancy, and making it that specific doesn't make much sense. Plus, in terms of relevancy, that can be subjective too. We'd have to be very specific about what we define as on-topic, because, for example, posting about Minecraft at the beginning would have been way off-topic, and now people are using it to plot points. Also it might lead to no-fun-allowed rules that get in the way of people's regular posting habits (meaning, as cringey as I think it is, people couldn't post MLP-shit and make fun of each other). I know what you actually mean (it seems like you're the one who reported that tripfag both times), and I do mostly agree with you. I just want to make sure this runs as smoothly as possible and doesn't require much in the way of ownership changes and public outcry. We should be putting our attention towards the math. The board itself is secondary. If I start doing things everyone hates, it'll waste time.

>rule 3

Everything about this is subjective. I don't think this would work.

>If VQC is posting, no vanity posting (e.g., Hi Chris XD lol we luv u)

>If you have to suck VQC's dick, at least have the decency to do it anonymously.

>no vanity posting, unless you want to

This one isn't even consistent. No offense, but I don't think you thought these through very much. In terms of those posts, I don't personally see why we should ban that unless it's to the point of spamming the thread. It's be more of a no-fun-allowed rule than rule 2. That's my opinion, anyway. I understand why you'd want rid of it.

This is all meant to be for the sake of making the best rules possible, so don't take any of this personally or as flat out refusal. Like I said, VQC hasn't taken the board from me, so I have a responsibility to keep there from being any kind of board drama while also keeping there from being tons of idiots posting dumb bullshit.