The trippy thing is that the difference of squares = triangles. >>3751
What a cool connection!! VQC is correct that our language and understanding of numbers is lacking currently. Squares relate to triangles relate to circles relate to trees.
>>3580
Fractals:
>(since the grid is effectively an overlay of the fractal nature of integers).
Part One:
>First decision, if e is 0, return d.
Second decision, if(GCD(e,d)!=1) return GCD(e,d);
So the GCD between d and e is the end goal of Part 1? What do we use this for? Ideas?
Part 2:
>The inputs into part two are to factorise d and e.
The end result of part two is a tree, descending from c with branches d and e, then branches descending from d and e or each of their square roots and remainders.
So the terminating factors are a big key. How so? We are working to understand. This is working from the opposite way we were doing with the VQC. Instead of building factors for c, we're breaking c into factors. Gotta be able to go both ways? Build or Break down?
Part 3: >>3709
We will combine factor tree knowledge with VQC knowledge. Then solve this.
Summary up to this point, let me know what should be added.