On -X, it is not a perfect mirror. Here is a view you guys are familiar with, the end in 3d plotted by E, X, and N.

-X is much smaller and compact. A different pattern.

Here they are together.

The line across E0, X0 is a bug, but can anyone else confirm that no cells exist with N= -1 for +E?

>>3482

Sorry, can anyone else confirm that cells don't exist where X = -1?

>>3485

a + b = 2(d+n) is correct, but a - b = 2(x+n) is not. In the original grid, A < B is always true, therefor a - b < 0, and 2(x+n) 0.

Also been gone a bit, safe to ignore everything other than VQC posts.

>>3488

Checked, I assumed that after a minute, and it seems like a property of all valid cells, but it also exists for some invalid cells. Not sure how to apply it.

>>3494

Renders done with two different isValid checks. Both use A != 0.

First image if (c - (d * d) e && d - a x){return true;},

second image if (a + b 2 * (d + n) && b - a 2 * (x + n)) {return true;}

>>3497

For X,Y,Z I'm using E,X,N. E extends away, N extends right, X extends up/down.

>>3499

Checked again. Yes, this is all combinations of E, X, and N using my bruteforce cell creation method.

And correct again, I'm saying formula applies in cells that aren't valid but I can also say the formula always applies in cells that are valid. At least where E>=0, but for any X (positive or negative) and any N < 0.

>>3500

N>0**.