>>3434
HA! Good to see you baker! Thanks for the delicious new bread. I DID thank the anon who posted the GR formula. "Looked up first Anon, I did."
>>3434
HA! Good to see you baker! Thanks for the delicious new bread. I DID thank the anon who posted the GR formula. "Looked up first Anon, I did."
Sheeeit. Good question, Anon. Trying to figure out how to put it in binary decision form. (I'll take Step 3 in Binary for $1000, Alex?)
Great visual projection Topol! This is where I have to keep my spiritual and emotional focus. If I let myself get frustrated by "lack of progress", I lose my joy. TREES ARE GOOD AND BEAUTIFUL! I love trees and math. This is an abstract math tree that exists in the source of all knowledge. We have been called here (self-selected perhaps?) to help reveal this beautiful tree to the world. We never give up, we just keep going. How do you say that in Latin?? That shit should be our motto here.
Error Correction:
>Then d[t] x[t] for n are the same in the prime solution.
Should be:
Then d and x for (prime n) are the same in the prime solution as they are in (e,1)
So I have a question for everyone: I'm looking at these factor trees (nice job, Anon!) and seeing all the smaller factors (the leaves?) medium size factors (branches) and larger factors (main trunks). Are these larger factors all prime?