>>2974

>>3031

>>3131

Let's focus again on c=145 for a minute.

We never made the connection between c and p records. This is where we gotta focus. na=a at (e,1) for c solution. Then d[t] x[t] for n are the same in the prime solution. The only (e,1) difference was the lesser t value for the prime solution.

Side Note: There's gotta be some Golden Ratio / Fib Sequence to how d,x,a,b tie together. All Nature and Growth are governed by these same rules, We're just helping uncover them.

>>3655

Yeah, it's beautiful. Looks like the cross section of a giant sequoia, where you can see the growth rings.

>>3654

So are you saying we can find one of the prime factors by adding up the "leaves" or "outer ring" of smaller factors and then use that to find the other prime factor? That would be cool!

>>3709

Baker, thanks for your good work, and thanks for keeping connected with Chris! Can you give a quick explanation on why you stopped at 10 for the right branch, leaving d=3 and e=1? Am I reading that correctly? Just want to make sure I'm following correctly.

N, or a or b for (e,n) has gotta be one of those large primes in the factor tree. We should take an RSAc from a solved example, run the factor tree program, and see if n or a or b pops up in the (1,prime). Thoughts?

>>3712

Thanks for remembering PMA! F can be constructed from c,e,d. In row one it helps derive x. In n>1 still not working. But if x in (e,n) is the same as in (e,1) maybe it can help us locate the prime x.

Here's a big picture idea:

Right now we're working on part 2, the factor tree.

Next, part 3: VQC meets factor tree.

At (1,c) in n is going to be the largest possible, because a and b are farthest apart.

At (prime solution) n will always be less because a and b are closer to d.

Factor tree allows us to see all prime factors, correct? (Could be wrong here)

(1,c) has highest n, a and b max distance.

(Prime) always has lower n, closer to f for a and b.

Factor tree allows us to quickly identify primes and test them for compatibility with c.

Thoughts?

And we can use (e,1) to help us find x?

>>3722

Should read

>(Prime) always has lower n, closer to d for a and b.

>>3719

Good explanation, thanks!

>>3720

I like triangles. /_\ especially when they are broken down like this:

+++

++

+

0

Bye bye scumbags! Our math triangles helped break your evil triangle HAHAHA

>>3754

Triforce gloves at the Ready, Lads! Thanks for the enthusiasm injection, MM! Gannon is going down with those wooly gauntlets. Link related, old school Legend Of Zelda final boss.

https:/ /youtu.be/O33Xybjegtc

>>3762

>>3763

>>3764

Lol, Wut? There is a LOT of info there, thanks PMA! I'll look for patterns in it a bit later tonight.

>3131

>3580

Still looking at c=145. Don't know why, but have the gut feeling the answer is starting us in the face with this example. Combine the factor tree knowledge (leaf sum?) with n=na and we can somehow get x or a.

>>3774

Sorry lads, green links, typing in by hand. Here are the correct ones.

>>3131

>>3580

>>3782

Will do! Thanks Anon!

>>4052

Thanks for defending us against shills, AA! F may hold an important key, not sure yet. Starting from c, f is one of the few we can immediately derive.

Let's factor f like so: d of f AND e of f using the tree formula. For the following cells:

Format {e,n,d,x,a,b} c, f, d of f, e of f.

First, (1,1) t=1-100

Then (1,2) t=1-100

Then (1,3) t=1-100

Can you anons please check my idea? Thinking that e of f can help make x for n>1.

>>4052

AA, please post some good esoteric reading about Meme Magick, and how we create our own reality. Topol should chip in too. Math is nice, Math + Mystery = Sexy.

Prepare for acceleration?

Hello Lads! Working on factor trees over here for f. Anyone have ideas or progress today?