>>6515
I'd be delighted–in fact, I was hoping that some of you would drop by on
occasion with some insight.
As far as an introductory thread, I think the best thing you could do would
be to immediately clarify that this is called a "virtual quantum computer",
not so much because it models one, but that it does what a quantum computer
can do–for these purposes, break encryption. Honestly, for all I know it
could be an exact replica–but the way I look at it, it's an analogy in the
fashion that "hands of stone" meant a hard-hitting boxer, not someone with a
medical issue.
From the other thread (re: your "what is the grid" .pdf), I think you nailed it
when you explained that what we're doing here doesn't really seem to involve
quantum computing; it's more a series of illustrative exercises meant to teach
us the true mathematics that have been hidden from us. That, combined with
some examples of what may be possible with such knowledge, would do well enough
to pique people's interest.
You're right that I'm doing this publicly for a reason–I'm trying to establish
the pattern of thoughts and realizations so people can see how one thing
progresses to another (this makes the arrogant assumption that I'll make it to
'another'). I'm also hoping to encourage others to do so–different people
will notice different things, which may, in turn, spark a realization in
someone with more knowledge.
I'm also making a program that will output .csv and .png files, then an
interactive 2D grid, then 3D, then 4D+. I imagine this is being taught to be
spread, so I'll make it available when it's done.
At this point I'm looking to isolate the patterns generated–there's obviously
some fractal action going on, but what is the base pattern that's being
repeated? The only unbroken lines emanating from (0,0) are the horizontal ones
starting one line below, the vertical one from center, and the two others
extending from an angle arcTan(2) (approx. 63.435 degrees) from horizontal.
It's also worth noting that the lines caught within the "christmas tree"
parabola are parallel to this line (I haven't verified this mathematically, it
just looks that way).
You can also see a line emanating 45 degrees from horizontal, though it isn't
continuous. The interplay of these two angled lines is what causes some of
the diamond patterns.
Furthermore, either the same sets of angled lines are emanating from each of
the vertical lines extending leftward, or the ones offset from the main ones
(coming off of 0,0) just happen to intersect the vertical lines perfectly.
This is an interesting relationship.
From the main vertical, as well as these two other angled lines, we see other
lines emanating…and they're always emanting to the left and/or up, in a
direction clockwise from the line where they start—like echoes reoccurring
further and further away.
But all this changes if you think of this as peering at a 3D image in 2D;
it's as if none of the cells are noise at all—rather, they're part of another
pattern coming from a different base. It's like looking at an x-ray that's
focused at too many depths, rather than the one you want to look at. The
vertical lines emanating from (0,0)—are they the only ones, or is there
another set directly behind them that's being covered? You can ask the same of
any of the lines we see. Also, the angles take on new meaning in higher
dimensions–are we looking at lines connecting the axis of different pyramids or
tetrahedrons? Cubes? A "Great dodecahedron?" Maybe lines connecting a sphere
to 13 other spheres (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalCode.html)?
I don't think this goes much further until we figure out how these relate in
3D+.
Pic related is a graphic illustrating how the "spiral" lines and the arcTan(2) line seem to relate