Shall I put my folder of 2,042 Pepes in the Meme Warehouse for public use?
I have been setting a fucking example for 3 years now. I have made over 4000 memes and collected over 70,000. I have worked here every single day except for the 3-month hiatus when the chan was down and a short period after my father died.
That's setting an example. Leading by example was always my style of team leadership, when I was in the business/technical world.
Nobody wants to do what I do.
The problem with leading by example is that you can get badly overloaded.
>- Organized MemeWars
organizes
Right now I'm not aware of anyone in Unit Opps who is monitoring hashtags or social media, other than casually/incidentally. It was easier, before Twitter changed their API. Now you have to have a twitter account to receive a notification when an account you're following anonymously has a new tweet. The not-logged-in web interface no longer gives notifications by changing the text on the tab.
We look at the Big Picture and try to understand long-range strategic targets as well as tactical ones suggested by news, POTUS tweets, Q decodes, etc. Sometimes we do breadth and sometimes depth. We have an Idea Lab where we toss ideas that might merit further exploration by means of memes, articles, etc.
Our planning and development of tools, websites, solutions is broader than just the social media teams. Some are working to reach out to the hordes of patriot normies. We are working on organization.
We identify news articles that are false or obvious deep state propaganda and write or recruit articles refuting them.
There are teams that ensure that anon-written articles get published.
No, Unit Opps does not train TA, Scouts and Flanks. We don't have the social media expertise to do that. YOU do.
Don't put my text into any kind of bulletin, I'm just kind of explaining what's going on.
Maybe what I described isn't Unit Opps, maybe it's the command & control structure with a scope broader than just warroom stuff.
Right now the "organization" that you are calling Unit Opps is very sparsely populated with a few anons doing many different jobs. It's a chaotic structure due to having so many holes in its fabric. The scope of the tasks far exceeds current staffing. An anon picks something that urgently needs doing, focuses on it, and other things fall on the floor temporarily.
I think, I hope, that is changing.
Realistic expectation: This is going to take a LONG TIME so we need a lot of patience and determination and faith to keep moving in the right direction together.
If you want to train additional social media warriors in the 3 roles, why don't you look at the Under Construction thread where we are trying to gather factual information to help SM anons get up to speed?
>>303 --> Under Construction
I will develop the FAQ but I need TA answers to the questions. That will be my raw material. I can't just go make stuff up because I do not know the answers to those questions.
YOU know how to keep your Twitter account alive but will you share your knowledge?
YOU know how to establish multiple twitter accts and set up different profiles and not get banned, but will you teach others?
There are MANY anons on QR who complain their twat acct was banned a long time ago and so, they are not going to do any more social media. A huge pool of potential warriors that just needs some guidance.
They have specific questions, more than the questions I typed out for you, but they are not asking them here because they don't know you are here and they don't know you have expertise to share.
Take a few hours and answer the questions in >>303 ob
When there's enough meat there, then I will turn it into a nice Q&A format that normies and anons can digest and get up to speed.
Sorry, your request is not understood.
I'm seeing two articles on the emerging (into public consciousness, we already knew) idea that the virus isn't nearly the threat portrayed.
This might be a good theme for today.
As Q says, is it about a virus or about an election (obviously the latter).
More support for the notion that the COVID-19 novel coronavirus is not the cause of any deaths, that it's scientifically impossible to develop a vaccine for it, and that testing for it is iffy at best.
This is subject matter for an Op-Ed or article.
“No One Has Died from the Coronavirus”
Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association
By Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett Global Research, July 03, 2020
A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.
Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.
He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.
These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.
Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).
And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of theCOVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.
Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.
The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.
Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.
The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.
Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.
Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.
For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.
“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:
In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”
These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.
The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/no-one-has-died-coronavirus/5717668
From QR notables #12622 >>>/qresearch/9863122
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
#2 from >>>/abcu/2065
>https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/07/02/huge-covid-case-counting-deception-at-the-cdc/
>For this piece, we have to enter the official world (of the insane)—where everyone is quite sure a new coronavirus was discovered in China and the worthless diagnostic tests mean something and the case numbers are real and meaningful. Once we execute all those absurd maneuvers, we land square in the middle of yet another scandal—this time at our favorite US agency for scandals, the CDC.
>The Atlantic, May 21, has the story, headlined, “How could the CDC make that mistake?”
>I’ve read the Atlantic article forwards, backwards, and sideways, and it appears the experts believe only PCR viral tests should be used to count the number of COVID cases.
>So here is a takeaway I find nowhere in the Atlantic article: COMBINING THE TWO TESTS WILL VASTLY INFLATE THE NUMBER OF CASES.
>The number media and government and related con artists deploy to scare the people and justify lockdowns and use to stop reopening the economy.
>Therefore, I’m not characterizing what the CDC is doing as a mistake. They’ve managed to create the illusion that absolute case numbers are higher than they should be.
>Somehow, these “mistakes” always seem to result in worse news, not better news. The “errors” are always on the high side rather than the low side.
>My headline for the Atlantic article would read: SO HOW MANY COVID CASES SHOULD WE SUBTRACT TO GET THE ACTUAL NUMBER?
>And the first paragraph would go this way: “Just when governors are trying to reopen their economies, a gigantic case-counting deception at the CDC is taking the wind out of their sails. The millions of Americans suffering financial devastation could be pushed back into a hole. Who is screaming to high heaven about THAT on the nightly news? No one. Why not?”
You are asking the anon who made the >>303 thread and typed the questions, to answer the questions. I cannot answer the questions, that's why I typed the questions.
I can actually DELETE that thread once we convert its contents into a true FAQ. It's a temporary workspace.
Don't worry about spelling & dyslexia - that's my job to digest information and make it into written material that can teach others. Rough text is fine, that's why it's under construction - that means not authoritative until we're doing massaging the info into something pretty.
I just put out a call for memes for this, on QR and abcu
> teach the world to meme
See memefarmer's The Tao of Memes
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly
What makes a good meme great
Tips & techniques for memers
Agree. Already having to copy material and create cross-linkages between 3 boards is taking an inordinate amount of muh time, time that could be used more productively doing actual work instead of just spinning muh wheels trying to connect people and cross-pollinate ideas
The text is beautiful! Anons finally whipped it into shape. (whew!)
One quick thing, just a format thing.
Make the 3 "go here" sentences at the bottom visually parallel by removing unnecessary newline before the https
So the TA and UO phrases visually match the SCOUTS and FLANKS phrase.
Great job anons.
Everyone who could potentially serve in any social media role but has problems setting up or using a SM account.
Found this going thru my social media tips collection.
Something like this to recruit Flanks and Scouts?
You're right.
Anons who spend time in the hostile abusive environment of social media need to decompress and lend moral support to one another and have some fun together.
Personally I do not understand how Truth Warriors (us) can use any tactics involving lies, or things we know to be untrue, or things we do not believe it or want to see happen. My faith (the Ten Commandments) forbids lying (bearing false witness) in any form.
Let us continue, together, to seek better and better ways to tell the TRUTH and shine light on the TRUTH without employing the tactics of the adversary ourselves. We don't want to become like them. We want to shine light on facts and truth, and win because we never deviated from truth.
Think about it. Let's think about our personal relationship to the truth and our commitment to truth and to using TRUTH as our weapon.
Image idea that focuses on light = TRUTH.