Because my connection environment is a narrow band, my ID might be different from last night. So, I put trip and a handle name after this. よろしく.
Are you dissatisfied with my >>390-391 proposal? If it is so, I don't have other ideas for smooth operation of pink bbs. I'm sorry that it cannot propose a useful opinion for you.
>>386 Jim-san > Please tell me more about your ideas for an examination.
If you are dissatisfied with a past content of the examination, we might be able to improve it. But as long as you don't clarify the thing who takes charge of the examination, it might be difficult to discuss the improvement about it.
For the above-mentioned reasons (>>390-391), I think the best method is that, the person who understands Japanese examines it in Japanese. However, if you don't hope for it, it is meaningless to assume the examination in Japanese.
So, may I hear the following?
When ◆ IZUMI162i6, chosen by our election, undertakes the volunteer leader post in Japan, do you have a mind to leave the selection of the volunteer in Japan to him? Or, are you scheduling another method?
>>393 > it seems like you want to make bbspink be under Japanese law.
From which part of my contribution, did you feel it like that? I said that the deputy and the volunteer who understood Japanese were necessary for pink bbs. However, it is from a simple, practical reason that present pink bbs consists chiefly by contributing Japanese. The problem of the law and the responsibility seems to be discussed here and there actively now. But it is quite irrelevant to my >>390-391 proposal. I didn't think of what you said at all.
To begin with, isn't it a thing the law of which country manages pink bbs that administration of justice in each country decides?