gb ID: ea662f Sept. 24, 2020, 5:45 p.m. No.27679   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7683 >>7686 >>7693 >>8909

>>27660

any note takers who pick a ghosted bred up should notify the dough and the baker depart crumb so that an incoming baker can easily identify that note s are on the offer when they arrive to bake.

 

on a side note I must say that the coverage has been fantastic lately and I've seen several "notes" step up in the later evening and middle of the night

It is through all of your good work and dedication that this is evolving into a fuggen TIGHT operation with almost no lingering issues. It was pretty good prior too so don't get me wrong

Not had to grab a ghost or do a bun for a week

Muh hat is off to all of you

gb ID: ea662f Sept. 24, 2020, 6:28 p.m. No.27728   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7730 >>7749

>>27721

the splainin about wut I was scrolling though and then the reason why it was there-that was not an easy one to get across

took a few rounds.

At first it was was "oh sure they put it in there on purpose and you have to look at it"

then the synapsis fired and it was ok.

Honestly I don't see any of that stuff now-just does not register

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 12:01 p.m. No.28054   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8055

WTF is boatfags problem with Cee?

first post of a bred is an attack on some notable inclusion-then both bicker back and forth.

whatever the issue is, you ladies need to solve it somewhere else.

general is not a therapy couch

>>28042

whatever your issue is get over it-this has gone on far too long and detracts from what is supposed to be habbening here.

Take your fee-fee's somewhere else

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 12:17 p.m. No.28063   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8064 >>8065

>>28061

saw some of this but not all.

so you're saying cee put own notable in bun?

saw others request for it but not sure if it was before it was included.

This is why I try to stay out of this shit as it just deteriorates into back and forth and not needed

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 12:24 p.m. No.28066   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8068

>>28065

>Im saying the anons vote to give tom fitton a notable is bullshit

not seeing the issue here

anons voted it in so we have to abide by those requests unless it is completely over-the-top.

Wouldn't note it muh self but if enough request and it's not total BS then I have no issue with it.

some things are noted (and nommed) that you will not agree with-this is life

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 12:43 p.m. No.28072   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8073 >>8074 >>8080 >>8081 >>8091 >>8156 >>8252 >>8289

>>28068

some of it I agree with however OSS started off as TYB and let's just say they were wrong on one of the very first issue(s) they decided they were "right" about-not related to baking (and do not wish to drag it back up) and were shown the shed for it.

This is how that relationship started with all-being so "right" they were shown to be wrong the very next day

>>28069

this

wut up KB

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 3:28 p.m. No.28094   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8095 >>8096 >>8097 >>8098

>>28091

triggered much?

You seem awfully defensive (as usual)

I mean you've posted three posts of absolute shit in a small period of time but I'm the "bad" one

GFY OSS-I see right through you and have since you wandered in here last year.

You got BTFO and now you are going to keep posting your rants about nothing while deflecting on the original issue you got called out for.

>shit you try to pull

again your opinion doesn't mean shit to me like your baseless lies and obfuscation.

But please continue to crusade against what you think the problem is

ProTip: get a mirror.

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 3:48 p.m. No.28099   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8100 >>8101

ce578a

>I'm cool as cucumber though

the 19 posts and multiple replies to the same one say different

are you done yet?

cause you still say the same shit over and over

nothing but a broken record

ta-ta

>>28098

yes we all did at some point-they have some baggage as a different handle prior to becoming OSS but refuses to admit it.

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 4:05 p.m. No.28104   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8105 >>8108 >>8147

>>28100

not against that at all and this is what usually habbens

Only a few times does it get nasty.

What I am against is someone having an issue with another and then INCESSANTLY bringing it up over and over again in general

this is not a new issue and they just can't seem to get over it

And always the same story

 

ce578a

did you say something again?

didn't think so

BTW you already have it

you can access it again here

>>28090

this relates to your admission of being TYB

it's all there bro but don't let facts get in the way of your "story"

 

You need to work your own issues out before you label anyone else bruh.

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 4:38 p.m. No.28107   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>28105

This is an on-going issue and continues to distract in general.

I've said it before-hash it out in here or meta but that doesn't seem to ever produce a result.

It's the bombs away attacks that get started in general with this over and over again.

I've actually defended OSS in the past but they never seem to grow up and out of this constant barrage mentality.

Have a good evening anon

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 7:48 p.m. No.28115   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8117

>>28108

grow up kiddo

Go bark up warrooms ass since they have been proven to have changed or altered the dough and has even blamed me there own miss-doings.

You obviously have nothing better to do but to project your issues, and they are YOUR issues after-all, onto anyone who habbens to be sick of your unprofessional and childish games.

Sad really as you habben to be competent at baking but your downfall is your emotion-on full display for all to see imo

you don't read anything or comprehend what is being said to you.

Show me where I am defending it?-you can't and BTW I am glad that anyone that comes in here can see your ridiculous attempts at framing comments to suit your version of an old and tired argument you have already lost.

so you continue your ego-based rants

not even worth the time to respond to your drivel any longer.

Focus on the job at hand instead of this ridiculous mess that you have created and continue to cling to.

 

fucking grow up

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 26, 2020, 8:05 p.m. No.28120   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8121

>>28117

you lied about your previous identity and I showed you your own statement/evidence. Anything after that is your fantasy because I could give two shits about the entire thing as this is between you and someone else

end

of

story

cry to your mom OSS

you really are a child

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 27, 2020, 2:30 p.m. No.28248   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8249 >>8252 >>8289

>>28234

never in here that late bro and reallyโ€ฆthree posts of insecurity displayed-you just cannot help yourself.

But continue to fabricate-it's your MO

At least you do your job

 

I have much better things to do at that time of night.

Spreading your shit into the dough now too.

It's hilarious.

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 27, 2020, 2:57 p.m. No.28254   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8255 >>8289

>And you can thank Cee for adding something with only 1 vote for last night.

>>10813086

WTF does that have to do with it?

So someone else does it and it's ok??

Give it moar time

>>10813194

ya, moar time - thru next bread

>>10813269

>>10813228 to baker

anons want more time to weigh in on this - thru nb:

>>10813194

>>10813086

Anonymous ID: ea662f Sept. 27, 2020, 4 p.m. No.28278   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8289 >>8289

>>28277

you changed the dough in one bred and how ever many you control it from that point.

That's a battle bro not a war

Go ahead and keep proclaiming victory in the battle

I'm here for the war.

Your cute little stories about everyone here are quite entertaining

moar than one on to you and your fuckery.