>>11168025 "patriot baker" says nothing to handoff
>>11168105 anon confirms -no more handoffs -free for all
looks like all handoffs are a thing of the past
free for all is the order of the day
lets hope BO has his locking figers ready
kek
>I thought this graphic was a decent one to test it out with
>welcome to the suck
based BO is based
can confirm
hmmmm, which bread did Q just post in?
Q Research General #14286 (For Anime Baker)
/comms/ bakers get BTFO by Q, again
>Untill Q comes out and directly says /comms/ is totally comped and fucked
kek
Q is getting pretty close to doing just that
/comms/ ebake was open for posting
but Q drops in Anime Baker Bread Insstead
reconcile timestamps
>Guerilla tactics, not trench warfare
anon
I read all you wrote
and interestingly
fucking hivemind
I was having these exact thoughts as I was walking the dog just now
nothing can ever really be deleted
as soon as you hit post, anyone that really needs to see it will get a ping
no baker of any kind will get away with moderating Q drops
who the fuck cares if they have gay shit in the dough
most anons dont use it, and the ones that do can use discernment to figure out what is useful lto them, and what isnt
your suggestiong is pure class
just post anon notes in every bread
every new bread
tag the dough post with a drop of the anon notables bin from the previous bread
they cant delete posts
or delete links
if anons can manage this, at least
there can be an unbroken chain of anon notables
also
definitely use the notables archive as well for the anon notes
great idea to keep them synced and up to date
also a good point
/comms/ is now burning the bread oldfags are hanging out in
I was receiving a lot of advise for my Chrons disease, from which I suffer every day
and /comms/ doesnt care
they are burning it anyway
I have asked them to stop so I can continue getting help and advise
and working on my disease with anons who are sincerely helping me
but no
burn it all down
really nice people
links, all other bread:
>Funny I have more of a chance of getting in trouble for recommending you take a probiotic than I do sayingnigger
then
>It's time to burn this stale half eaten loaf.
then
>anons are helping me to heal a literal life taking illness
>and you are going to burn the bread?
then
>why are you doing this?
>I am formally requesting
>please
>stop
then
>anon
>I am being helped by the anons here
>I am sincerely in need of this help
>can you please stop this?
these arereallyspecial people we have "baking" huh?
thank you VERY much BO
I sincerely appreciate everything I have seen you do over the past month
thank you for reminding me to enjoy the suck
and thank you for such a based recommendation
good copy
message well received
how about your doughlist post of my "appology" for "censoring" your notables when I didnt cross postONEof your duplicate breads into my chain of notables
I included every duplicate bread notable anons posted in my bake
but somehow
not including the notables from your duplicate bake into my bake constitutes censorship
I appologized for missing that duplicate breads notables bun
and you said you had saved it as proof of my faggotry
where is it?
thanks!
as BO would say
welocme to the suck
did you think this would be easy?
yes comms is literally fucked
yes ALL anons know
what is important?
the information flow
the activity of the hive
not who is baking
I have stepped up where I could to help bake
you may recognize my avatar
or this patch I fashioned
If you think BO is an easy position in all this, then YOU can go fuck yourself
I despise what comms has become
if it was ever something great
I have supported OSS and AnimeFag
but I am not about to cause harm to the board because BO isnt sucking my dick 24/7
spamming the board when you dont get your way
filling the catalog with breads because you dont like who is baking
these are NOT things I support
regardless of who is baking
as always
the anons know
if anons congregate to a /comms/ bread
nothing changes
if /comms/ bread engages in fuckery
anons will BTFO that place and move on
same thing goes forANY BAKER
shills will attack at all times
for every reason
that aint new
Buckle up, anon.
This is not a drill.
I have watched BO lock over 30 /comms/ duplicate breads over the last month
since I helped start this shit on10/03
Yes, I am owning up to the responsibility of having contributed to this bakerwars shit
In MY opinion
BO is not siding with COMMS
BO is watching where the anons go as best he fucking can, given the situation
and locking all breads that fall behind
I do NOT envy BO's position
collateral damage
friendly fire has occured
that doesnt make BO the enemy
welcome to the fucking suck
For God & Country
o7
>Yes, I am owning up to the responsibility of having contributed to this bakerwars shit
-->>10913034 (me)
-->>10913034 (me)
-->>10913034 (me)
-->>10913034 (me)
-->>10913034 (me)
trust me anon
I fucking get your concerns
this is war
lets rally together
and
WIN
WIN
WIN
o7
>I invested hours upon hours to free anons from them while you shitposted
fuck you
I supported the FUCK out of OSS and AnimeBaker-san
so literally
go FUCK yourself with that shit anon
so, I am just a shitposter to you then?
didnt bake enough to meat your measure?
my constant support in all breads I have been in for the past 3 months?
(I have been supporting you since long before this RedOctober bullshit)
so much piss in the wind?
I will never stop supporting (you)
but seriously
we have had huge wins
and lived in the suck
one battle is not the war
dont know what to tell you
you are an assetIdo not want to loose
hence my constant support
o7
also not sure what to say about this
all anons know
the general opinion of comms right now is astronomically bad
honestly why care about anyones opinion about you in the first place
secondly no belives their bullshit
you have literal best selling novel level fiction writers writing fan fiction about you, man
you are legend
Shadilay, niggger.
unfortunatly
I have shit to do
I have to go
but I cant pull myself away
Goodluck and Godspeed Patriots
before I go
for the record
and for shits and giggles
this bread is a ghost:
>>11106003 (OP)
>>11106003 (OP)
>>11106003 (OP)
>>11106018 dough?
>26cc0e
>>11219464 (me) first call
>>11219660 (me) second call
>>11219774 (me) third call
Its Official
This Bread is A Ghost
Ghost Bake Protocol in Effect
>LITERALLY WENT TO A BREAD OVER A WEEK OLD
…..you have to be fucking kidding me….
why do I have to be so busy!
I am missing this shit
/sad face/
>the keeper of the 10 Lost Breads
kek!
I remember that, anon
hilarious
not your first bread numbering fiasco rodeo
>Since I've been barred from doing so
victim consciousness
thats a (you) thing
no one is barred from baking
>So, we'll see what goes on, now.
see something
say something
friend
'see you in the stream'…?
o7
>Passkey Interrogation (BAD)
1000% agree
refusing to handoff to any 'anon' is what lit this off to begin with
you know them by their fruits, and by no way else
>Its first offer is first served
this
that is a BIBLICAL concept
and is the foundation for ALL common law on commerce and trade
and by handing off responsibility from one party to another we are engaging in trade
hence
first come, first serve is the law of the land
>The first offer can be differed to a subsequent offer.
>This can happen when someone really didn't want to bake, or when they are new and would rather differ to a potentially more experienced baker.
>This isn't about placing blame, as you will see if anyone gets that it is me.
also this
I have seen this many times
→ First Request to Take From Baker On Duty
→ First offer to take from anon -something like
"can e-bake one if you gotta go bakes!"
→ Second offer to take from (poentially) more experienced anon -something like (tagging baker and first offer from anon)
"can bake for a while if needed, would ]first taker[ like to bake one and handoff? Or would you like me to take it from here?"
and then like a 50/50 outcome of either choice
soetimes anons wants to bake one and "experienced" baker oblidges
sometimes anon is happy to have someone with stronger legs take the bake and immediatly defers
imho this is a good example of things being "nice and tiddy"
>ALWAYS been the baker's call
funtionally
absolutely correct
when applied in context with actual anons
refusing to handoff to the first offer made is going to lead to friction
if it is done too egregiosly/ too often
itwilllead to continuing splitting of the bread
this is basic commerce law
when a baker on duty offers to another anon the responsibility of the kitchen they are engaging in commerce
they are making an offer
(insert first come/ first serve clause here)
there are 4 moral responses to an offer made in commerce
1.Refusal
-flat refusal of all terms
-this is called refusal of commerce
-you are refusing to engage in legitimately offered commerce
-by refusing commerce as a resolution to the offer you areaccepting the terms of waras a resolution to the offer
2.Ignorance
-ignoring the offer
-I dont know the period (I think it is 30 days or, 2 fortnights) but this is the length of time you have to morally respond to an offer
-if the offer is ignored beyond this point, it is considered refusal of commerce
-and thus, anacceptance of the terms of waras a resolution to the offer
3.Acceptance
-flat acceptance of all terms
-commerce accepted
-offer agreed too
-all parties are now morally responsible to meet all terms of the offer
4.Conditional Acceptance
-commerce accepted under condition
-parties engage in negotiation over conditions
-either negotiations are succesful, and conditions for commerce are agreed too
-or negotiation is unsuccesful, and both parties agree to amicably part ways, or:
-the terms of war are acceptedas a resolution to the offer
In the context of On Duty Baker requesting a handoff
If the baker makes the request OPEN, and WITHOUT condition:
Example:
"Baker Seeking Handoff, Kitchen is offered."
Then I dont see how that baker can add conditions to the orriginal offer after any anon has accepted the orriginal terms of commerce -no conditions.
As in the example:
Baker on Duty: "Baker Seeking Handoff, Kitchen is offered."
first anon offer: "Offer Accepted. Handoff Confirmed?"
Baker on Duty: "Let me see your credentials"
This is a breach of commerce, in changing the conditions of the orriginal offer AFTER it has been duly accepted in commerce
NOW
It is, in practice, solely the decision of the on Duty Baker how to engage in commerce
As I am brainstorming;
If On Duty Baker states the condition of baking credential requirement (whatever they decide that is) in the orriginal offer to handoff the kitchen, then that condition is duly made in commerce.
It would then be the anon accepting the offers responsibility to accept that condition, and offer credential
Refuse that condition and engage in war
Ignore that condition and effectively let someone else take the commerce
or
Conditionally accept the offer, and negotiate the terms of credentials.
If negotiation fails, I can see multiple potentials outcomes;
amicable resolution -third party baker accepts all terms of credential requirement, meets the terms, and takes the bake
no amicable resolution -terms not accepted and war chosen as resolution to offer of commerce
But, seriously, I am not even really sure about the morality about refusing the on duty bakers offer with conditions, if the conditions are clearly stated in the original offer?
it seems this would only be moral if the condition of credential requirements ITSELF was considered a breach of commerce in the sphere of /qresearch/ baking
These are my brainstormings on the subject.
Anyone see any faults in my logic?
Care to offer and criticism?
o7
>anons should nominate a new baker in the shit baker's own bread, to document it.
TOTALLY agree to this
going johhny rambo is not ideal
let the anons get angry enough to DEMAND someone "split" the bread
and then offer to be that baker for anons
and, I think you are adding this step
throw out a Handoff Confirmed to these anons who are demanding
and let them confirms you?
and then, proceed as directed by anons?
Am I picking up what your putting down?
your fucking retarded anon
ctr+f my user ID
comms is cancer
and so is any other board those faggots create
to BTFO yourself with that shit, faggot
o7
>my solution will be: If I do not see a baker I think can handle it, I will ghost the handoff and let the anons figure it out.
I also see not problem at all with this
this further sounds like an amicable compromise solution
kek, only baker I am seeing that is not allowed to bake is animebaker
what the fuck is up with that
I have never seen more vile behavior from "anons" than what gets directed at animebakes
I dont get it
So its official, then?
anime is not allowed to bake on /qresearch/?
interesting indeed
and the show rolls on
o7
kekbee?
you mean to say the /comms/ faggots betrayed you too?
I am legit sorry you got stabbed in the back
for what its worth
I have always thought you an individual
and have dealt with you (and whatever actions of yours I support, or dont support) on that basis
holy fuck man
well I have a better appreciation of the actions I have seen from your over the past month now
wecome to the suck, indeed
as long as we are one step closer to the Truth
we are one step stronger as individuals
but fuck man
on the one hand I would not have expected 'them' to do that
but
on the other hand
it does further confirm what I (and others) have suspected about that "crew"
and it further confirms that (you) are actually an individual
and further, you are not lieing when you claim to abhore group think
inspite of any altercations we have had
you have been a helpful guidepost of sorts for me at least
thank you for taking the time to answer my questions when you have been able
o7
cant tell you anons how good it is to read that series of comments
sounds like we are coming to a resolution of sorts
feels good
yeah well the other bread had WarRoom baker insert WR link back into the dough for a one bake wonder
and the handoff chain in the previous bread before the split is literally fucked
no one tagged the dough
typos all over the "handoff confirmed" so you cant ctr+f to find
and to top it all off
the transitioning bakers were vpn IP-hopping
(I am not accusing, they stated it in the bread, go check -kek)
>yes i am vpn, prepare for handoff next bread
go check the bread
its proper fucked
I am not sure how anyone did NOT see the split bread coming
topkek
Is AnimeBaker being spoofed and gangstaled?
you decide
if any anons have any memories on the details in this link from /qresearch/ bread, please add to the pile
→ >>11348360 (qresearch)
→ >>11348360 (qresearch)
→ >>11348360 (qresearch)
top fucking anon, kekbee's
thank you very much for clearing up my main confusions on board functionality
>You realize it's Doc baking right?
I'll bite anon
either this "new baker" just did a literal Rocky Montage of baker training behind the scenes
or that was not a fucking new baker
like, duh
9+ hours straight
-managed Q drops
-baked with perfect timing
-LAST CALL notes @650
-sniping fresh bread links
If it IS a new baker
then ALL the props in the world
but suspicious anon is suspicious
also
I liketyb'sas much as the next baker
I'll take the oxytocin hit, I can usually use it
but holy fucking shit
you would think this baker is Q
pic related
so like, I am following
do you have a detail you saw that makes you think it is Doc specifically?
5:5 anon
it did NOT feel organic to me at all
I thought it was all gravy at first
when I came back after getting some sleep and "new baker" was still going I knew something was 'off'
previously stated details further set off my autist alarms
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I fucking KNEW I recognized that shit
fucking proper anon
fucking proper
five fucking five
and ohhh seven
baker snipes the faggot that tried to split their bread
BO/BV insta-locks the split bread
I call that a confirmed kill, folks
faggot down
that eye dont lie
-fucked around
-found out
…welcome to the suck indeed…