kek.. You should rename this thread The
Bakery Pawn Shop.
Shadilay o7
>There was a time where everyone looked high and low for bakers to keep the e bakes at bay now we have more bakes than we need and the show keeps going on.
>This is how you use every part of the buffalo
>This is how you use every part of the buffalo
Thank you, BO. Don't know how you feel about me, and I probably don't want to know anyway :)
But thank you for your service o7
-kekbees
>>>/doughlist/169 why power trips are bad for bakers to have
>>>/doughlist/171 for future refererence
your panels are just appeals to authority. None of them include me.
So yeah, you dragged me into your bullshit, and I will be able to respond to all of your innuendo about me.
Have a great day grieving and sperging over that.
You didn't like my opinions, so you dragged me into your drama with ZERO proof.
Keep posting.
Me. Other bakers. You were not careful in your attacks, and censored innocent people.
I was just better prepared for it, because you attacked me in the spring, again with NO EVIDENCE.
>>>/doughlist/ was made for shitbags like YOU.
So blame your fucking SELF.
kek, it's in the breds. Just because I didn't respond to any of it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
And I capped it all.
<you
You're sperging again by the way..
Because you don't like others to have opinions that are not yours.
For a guy that purportedly wants anons to work together, you sure to put out a lot of divisive bullshit.
I tested in on the clown doc. The person that wrote that made it exactly 5000 chars.
5001 chars didn't allow that pasta. I checked on the 8chan test thread before the move to kun.
Maybe that changed for kun?
The one posted by the BO is missing some of the formatting characters, and is not 5000 characters, anymore. I'm talking bout the original >>2322789
You want me to post it to this thread... again?
okay
>>11115349 (this bread)
>>>/doughlist/138 (op)
13980 was a legit handoff.
my bakes were attacked.
I handed off tot he first baker who offered.
You've just now admitted to fucking around during that set of bakes.
The last time I baked was 10-04-2020. So you've been prosecuting bullshit.
I hadn't baked for weeks preceding this flap you speak of. So you're full of shit. I took a hand off, and gave a hand off.
And then was threatened over an opinion, by you.
Have a great day o7
go say that to Q.. you fags have contrlled the bake for a month.
ALL changes to dough are owned by OSS and animefag. You think Q didn't notice when you fucked over the qmaps?
kek
and I always tripfag when I bake. because the current occupants of the kitchen like to fuck around
The anons control the board. Just like I told you a month ago.
Now you're sperging at the bo because they won't suck your dick.
Why? I've already stated in their stream that I only want to lurk. Just like all of the other streams. AND I am still only in control of my own locked board only.
I merely poastd that cap to show you take things out of context, and has clipped that statement off to suit your own agenda.So you're just trying to stir some shit again.
Are you trying to say anons should not be everywhere? Because anons being everywhere means…. Everywhere ;p
How the fuck else am I supposed to see for myself? you think I'm going to take your word for anything at all after what's gone on? kek!
Have a great day stirring your pot of shit :D
I am everywhere. Suck for you to hate it. And I tripped up knowing you would do that. Even told that BO how to fix their trips so I could trip up correctly.
I've got nothing to hide.
Yep, I support all community boards that have anons in them. That's why despite lurking all of the boards, I only want to bake on QR.
Since I've been barred from doing so, me being vocal about it has been a problem for your agenda.
I've been targetted for a while.
Don't get suckered into wasting your time. Hardened anons should already know this shit; This is more a crash course for new visitors.
How to Quickly Spot a Clown
They will:
-
Attempt to get a divisive or emotional response from you to derail research.
-
Concern troll and copy/pasta spam shill to contradict confirmed findings.
-
Employ faux debate tactics: Generalizations, gas-lighting, projection, misdirection, false equivalences, confusing correlation with causation, appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks, straw-men, red herrings, etc.
-
Promote social ethics that are disingenuous like doxxing, "reverse psychology", or promoting propaganda.
-
Promote tactics that are unethical, illegal or involve violence outside the scope of the Law.
-
Employ Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt to dissuade research.
Topic sliding If information of a sensitive nature has been posted on a discussion forum, it can be quickly removed from public view by topic sliding. In this technique a large number of unrelated posts, or posts aimed at diluting the information presented, are submitted in an effort to trigger a topic slide to literally push content out of view. Operators can control several fake UIDs via the bots they make use of; these can also be called upon in the other techniques to mask the intent of the operator from the users at large. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and bogus postings.
Seeding bad information Operatives will insert flawed or bogus information from time to time as an ongoing tactic, depending on their skill set and the needs of their mission. Their most common ruse is providing information or evidence which is backed by bad source material in the hope that the "source of the source" is never checked. This serves several objectives, mainly resource consumption, evidence pollution, discouragement and misdirection.
Astroturfing consensus This is a technique that attempts to build a manufactured consensus around a flawed set of statements or compromised information. This is related to consensus cracking, where false evidence is injected in an attempt to dispute or discredit what the current consensus is, and push it towards the desired false consensus. Misleading and false evidence and information are often salted into the evidence pool, with an aim to impede organic consensus building, while also poisoning the available information and evidence.
Cultivating tacit approval (The legal term for this is 'silent agreement') Attempting to attain this state is done using a technique where operators will try to convince the user population to ignore, or not respond to bad information or false assertions. This is done in a bid to reduce push-back against the above mentioned tactics. It's worth noting that the reply filtering mechanism of the boards (which currently can't be disabled without code changes from the site admin) is used as a weapon of sorts in this tactic: Filtering with software prevents anons from defending against seeding bad information and astroturfing consensus. This is why the operators push so hard to condition anons into filtering material they disagree with.
How to spot a Clown's bot
NEVER DIRECTLY ENGAGE A BOT It just wastes bread with their responses, and hands them a target to programmatically lock on to without handler interaction. It seems that the easiest way to foil the bots is to point them out by proxy, by copy/pasting the user's ID as a quoted reference and intentionally breaking its post link in your response and/or answering it with a meme until they start misfiring because they can't parse the response to lock onto a target correctly.. Doing this can also make the bots look artificially erratic and easier for other anons to spot.
What we know about the cl0wnbots
-
Are used to facilitate topic sliding, manufacturing consensus, obfuscation of intent, and general disruption
-
Require a handler to watch for and be in the thread
-
Cannot enter threads themselves
-
Respond to replies and each other, and can create replies
-
Can pick up random or contradictory meme flags
-
Activate on lists of trigger words; these can change over time
-
Use a combination of legit pasta, pre-written points, or spam targeted at various objectives.
-
Have unwittingly pasta'd supportive replies
-
Are employed mostly at night and on weekends (US time)
-
Add to bump limits
-
Can be filtered by ID once they are observed
-
Are not perfected and can be easily spotted
-
Were deployed starting on the /CBTS/ board
-
Have certain flaws that can cause them to misfire in sometimes comical ways
-
The handlers can make bogus clown threads, but also can be confused by accidental ones
-
Handlers still cannot access the servers
-
Have still not succeeded in their mission
-
Still can not meme
k. I'll start offering handoffs again and we will see what happens then.
if some douchefag tries to split my bake, you'll have your answer.
because, I'll tell ya, I've never been denied a handoff, not even by the bv's back during the baker checks. and they know it, because 8-bit was the bo back then, and they had my hash.
So, we'll see what goes on, now.
I can only take a handoff in good conscience if I have the time to actually bake the entire bread. Anons have been left hanging like that too often.
As you can see here >>11265545, I will be offering relief going forwards, as time allows.
I appreciate your offers. o7
I'm sticking with my current system. I will be giving my bake history, and letting the baker outgoing baker decide.
Regardless of what the qr mod team does.
Because any baker that is afraid of their own history, is at the mercy of anons.
That's why tripcode are cool, and also why I WILL NOT ask the bo to turn them on; I founfd my own solution that works.
Full transparency.
It has ALWAYS been the baker's call as to who they give the dough to.
IMO, there is no easy answer to this. Because there is no easy way to come to a consensus without shills being present to try to crack it.
Except waiting for time to reveal: Rome wasn't built in a day ;p
>This is the issue. I think we have all pretty much BTFO of the pastebin confirm closed loop shit.
This is a double edged sword too. I came up with my system because I will not get a bin account ;)
The only reason I deposited a tripcode on qbin was so nobody could pretend to be me.
I only verify with tripcodes.
I see your opinion, and here is my own.
(4) will happen, whether etiquette is followed by the bakers or not; imo, anons should nominate a new baker in the shit baker's own bread, to document it.
That last part is important. '''Going Johnny Rambo and just baking a fresh without consulting other anons, and documenting it is the problem.
This is why I do not see a problem with pic relates. The real problem isdocumenting it.
Shadilay o7
as far as the terms of contract piece you're enumerating, I don't see a problem with it.
I've always either just handed off, or asked straight up for cred. No need for terms changes.
The only reason I started asking for cred in the first place is because I kept getting fucked on handoffs at 4-5 am…
And the baker always gets shit on for handing off to shills. So it's a lose-lose either way.
Last time I got fucked over like that, it was a skinny white cat lookin like it wanted to play cards or something.
I think if it becomes too much of a problem, my solution will be: If I do not see a baker I think can handle it, I will ghost the handoff and let the anons figure it out.
this is subject to change, but as of now I don't see an easy solution because it seems liek half of the anons want to see a work history so they kjnow what they are getting, and the other half clearly doesn't give a shit, as long as there is bread.
>anonymity
I don't ask for wetware id.
I ask for wrok history.
big diff.
Do you even know who I am????
No, you don't. I'm just a bee with a baking record to you.
> I really do not think BO want's to go there though.
I don't think the BO should change their tripcode format at all.
Q should be the only anon that gets to use trips directly.
I'm fine with challenge-responses. o7
false. I started my record by being my own authority.
I got tired of burning screenshots to prove I had good bakes, so I started collecting them for use in building a 'chain of authorship
Just like Q. I did not get my authority from any baking council. I got it the og way, by baking on graavy and saving evidence of my bakes
Despite Pushback in the very place I went to ask for opinions. AS seen in this screenshot.
I thnked them anyway, the feedback given helped harden my system. Pic and link relates.
ANYONE can make their own baking record, it requires NO GRANT of permission to do, except talking to the platform owner.
AND, it is the baker's own chouice as to whether they choose to protect their ability to bake or not.
My system is for me. I do not care if anyone else choses to do it or not. The information is here, if they choose to make use of it.
culling is a deepstate practice. Q has warned against culling.
https://qanon.pub/?q=cull#3038
https://qanon.pub/?q=cull#3906
In hindsight, I'm glad I trip up when I can. Makes it harder for people to talk shit about me, kek..
You've harassed me for being in all the streams. You've affixed intentions to me without first taking my actions as a baker into account. You've never once shown me a shitty bake I've done, or a time where I tried to hide anything.
I've gone out of my way, to not hide.
Did you know that I insist on lurking all of the streams to see fuckery for myself? I've stated this enough times.
Did you know I started lurking comms because I smelled something off, after being invited there in April? I've stated this several times, here, in comms itself, and in the qr stream.
I do not have a problem with you as a baker, never have. My problem with you has been wrapping me up in things I have not condoned or done. Every single time something happened in /comms/ I did not like, I spoke up about it.
I was thrown out of comms by nightbaker for speaking up in this manner.
Now you want to throw me out of qr for doing the same here.
Prove me wrong. All of the seminars are viewable.
So yeah, I got thrown out of fucking class for telling the teacher off. Just like in high school. Go figure.
Its true though. Shill will not have the energy or desire to bring anything but hate to qr,
I stand behind my statement.
Proof is I'm still here.
I meant to say baking.
And sem #34 was when the welcome mat was pulled for me. >>>/comms/29752
They didn't like my opinion either.
that action of nb taunting me to bake that Friday, led directly to me getting ambushed on 10.4.
and, why did I choose to STOP baking in the first place?
didn't want to participate in the drama games. Splitting bakes is fucking stupid.
>>11309425 Sauce for the thrown out comment : >>11310325
If you read down from there, you will see that I was basically told to leave… Because I hadn't baked in a few weeks?
okay.
moar sauce: >>>/comms/29758
Have a great day.
Spin that however you like.
seen. Please understand that:
1) I'll offer relief if I have time for the bake. I will only step up on short notice if I see a need for an ebake.
2) I do not have a problem with your bakes, I've just not been around to offer before someone else does.
I cannot take bakes if I don't feel I can finish them, it isn't right. It would be a disservice.
I'm actually glad I got to answer your bv question before the bo did; I wouldn't have volunteered even if asked. They have enough drama to deal with.
So only you can be everywhere? That's pretty whack, kek… They all know and have known that I will not do groupthink.
Why do you think I flatly refused to get a bin?
nb specifically taunted me on 10.2 into an ambush which resulted in split bakes on the morning of 10.5.
Since I offered a by the book handoff to even get the bake, I consider what happened after the first bake in the run, an ambush.
My mistake was baker feels. Can't have em.
I should have know it would be an ambush.
Because they turned on me in sem #34 like Jekyll and Hyde. Was surreal.
Think about this: Anons are fighting a power structure that has been with us since the Sumerians.
Trump has done beeter in four years than any other President in history, other than the Founders themselves.
yep. I've pretty much taken the opinion that if the clowns wanna bake… They will bake. They know that the only real way to get rid of them is to lock down the bake…
But doing that puts any given baker in the bad boy box. There's so much bread now it's pointless to even offer now at some times.
So the clowns will bake. Despite anyone's best intentions.
But. If they fuck up at all, they will get shitposted at mercilessly. Is it spam? Maybe. The BO/BV's can look at my post history and decide who I am for themselves based on the content, and I'm not ashamed of that. None of it was gross or illegal.
Why do it? Certainly not because they are baking; They are 'clowns injecting shit that is not anon; Because… "Anyone can bake". Since the clowns get paid to do it, they better be fucking perfect at it.
Because the real tell is: An anon will tell the baker exactly what they are fucking up and why.
A shill will post gore and loli porn. Big fucking diff.
case in point right here. How many hours have been spent fighting shills for the bake?
They baked anyway.
Another thing that muddies the waters: The shills will use reverse psychology. Anons discard that.
I've pretty much come to the idea that the bo is trying to do something about it, they can only do so much without interfering with anons, themselves.
Welcome to the suck, indeed.
I do not care if others do not like my opinions in the stream, I will be giving them. Loudly. All set with being part of the silent majority. That didn't work. If I'm a "shill" for doing that… Too bad.
The shills try to stifle ALL opinions, oss. So they are trying to stifle YOU, too.
Recognize.
no.. Splitting bakes only serves the shills, by giving them ammo.
I did support your nomination by anons last night though.
I know. That is why I brand every bake into my board.
I knew imposters would go for me, because I am vocal.
I saw that float through in May too, while I was still finalizing /doughlist/
They didn't even use the right image.
This is how stupid the shills are: They tried to impersonate a baker that tripfags to get bakes… by image fagging?
kek.
1) confirmed. saw animefag tripfag to the /miku/ board on one occasion, and /rule34/ on another occasion, so:
2) you can tripfag on any board that allows it, but:
3) single whack tripcodes are very easily cracked. Sooo it's not really a security measure as implemented by them, they're literally just tripfagging to do it. If they were serious they wouldn't have generated their custom one. imo.
That is all.
also, the reason why the trip flashes when viewed from /qr/ is because the mouseover picks up the /qr/ css.
mine does it too.
is that why all the anon bakers are leaving a trail to the next bread? Now they're doing it with phonefag pics.
That's a work history too ;p
But keep grieving.
>you know them by their fruits, and by no way else
Transparency is the only way forward.
…But a work history shows no fruits? kek?
This is why this whole this is fake and quite gay:
Historically, if an anon wants to prove they can bake… They have gone and picked up a ghost during graveyard shift. When /qr/ needs it the most.. And then screencapped the bake with a you and a timestamp.
Well, holy shit. There's your anon work history, faggots. You just validated your fucking selves.
For fucks sake, stop being so fucking helpless.
I didn't really consider who it might be, just saw a baker trying to be a hypocrite about work history by pretending that phonefagging a written message to a new bread is not a chain of authorship.
It's a crude chain of authorship to be sure, but it still is one.
From my perspective, the baker wanted to play semantics games; A rose is still a rose, even if it's sitting on a shitpile :)
Interesting that they baked all day. So the "Rocky Montage" is telling.
looks like nightbaker made that first one if you go by the bin image int he graphic.. and used my pepe meme from 2018…
the ezbake instructions I remember.
>You were right about the it all,
>but the bad is being used for the good.
Shit happens in the gulch. Home is where the heart is. Traitors lose either way.
God bless and protect Trump, especially now.
Election day + 10 == Friday the 13th, this year.
What a coincidence ;p