>>1318468 (prev.)
>>1318195 Interdasting CDANs
i'm
>not familiar with how to read CDAN
myself, to be honest.
but simultaneously annoying and fun, in their own way, they are. (and considering the difficult subject matter, that's quite a feat)
i guess it's like that for Q for a lot of anons...
why won't it diiiiie
>can be done
sure, but not everyone has the knowledge to be passed down, the ability and time to do it, etc, and meanwhile the public schools would be left to rot?
Good on ya, but no reason not to work on fixing that, too.
>>1318643 >>1318665
here's copypasta of directions written yesterday, but i might be making it look worse than it is, though:
basically posting like here, you just need to know the ritual… i work with notepad++, 4tabs for each part, another for the whole for the pastebin, editing/copypasting pieces as needed.
For the notables, we tried a new recipe the other day, it was going pretty fast and another anon took charge of notables completely, posting near the end of thread, it worked beautifully.
i do as follows:
-get pastebin, open in Notepad++
-have 5 files: dough1, 2, 3, 4, paste1642(xxxx)
-open 2 catalog tabs, and another one for pastebin newpaste ready (and current bread of course)
-catalogtab1, create new thread, paste section1
-quadruplecheck the number & name (Subject field) of the thread
-collect notables, adjust parts as needed, etc
-post… often it cycles at 100% but doesn't finish, that is why the 2nd catalog tab:
refresh, until new bread appears (not very long, usually, but sometimes needs 2 refreshes)
-then go in your new bread, can close the other tab no problem, post sections 2,3,4, copy all that to the new pastebin
-paste that link to archive/hand-off dough
-tag your first post/link to bread, prepare your NEW BREAD post
-don't post it too soon, because anons then just go
fill
fill
fill
and that SUCKS.
oh, and the timing in general, that's a bit tricky. If not too fast you can wait until gets close to 700, but starting baking, go earlier, around 650, to be safe.
any other questions?
>>>/comms/154 for moar
wtf, you're getting your panties in a bunch defending
>*******,=,e
?
fuck's sake, they couldn't ban it fast enough.
botspam, randomcrap by near hundred posts each bread, namefagging… no excuse
>Who writes them? Are they credible? Do they ever come true?
>Can somebody look into this guy?
YOU are the one, anon.
>I dont have the means, nor the skills
Yes, you DO. Here are the means: >>4852
Use those FREE resources at your disposal. It doesn't take skill, it takes a small amount of effort, a little bit of time, and a bit of organization. Look at his connections to other people we observe/target.
Paste what you find to a text doc, organize it so it's logical and paste it in here to follow up.
That's how you start, that's how it gets done. One anon at a time. YOU are that anon this time.
copypasta from tutoranon
also applies to "what is a search engine?"