>>14889481 pb

>You have no evidence to support thay claim. Pure hopium bullshit.

True, no sauce. It's this anon's speculation. Just seems to fit since elections have been predetermined for decades. Explain to me how Trump actually won in 2016 knowing this. I'm all ears and open minded.

>There is no sane reason to willingly give control of NSA and nuclear codes back to [them]

I'm not suggesting that occurred. Illegitimate election Trump hangs on to NSA control and the nuclear football. Not hard to swallow