Anonymous ID: bf9252 Jan. 3, 2022, 8:09 p.m. No.15305312   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5317 >>5321 >>5328

>>15305274

>>15305289

>>15305296

>If you couldn't tell that that guy loves fudge pie, then you need to sharpen your discernment

Imagine trying to discredit this as just a cuck being exposed. Imagine Q research no longer being interested in an obvious MOSSAD operation ring trying to influence and subvert alt-right media.

 

208905-Sep-2018 12:39:27 PM EDTQ !!mG7VJxZNCI8ch/qresearch

>>2887228

Ask yourself a (simple) logical questionโ€ฆ

Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates?

Why are we a threat to them?

Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility?

Why was this done in the past?

We knew this type of "attack" was coming.

PREDICTABLE.

FAKE NEWS.

ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY.

Q

Anonymous ID: bf9252 Jan. 3, 2022, 8:54 p.m. No.15305534   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5558 >>5789

>>15305442

>Taking things out of context in regards to AJ makes you look like project mockingbird.

>

>Just sayin.

>>2887228

 

Ask yourself a (simple) logical questionโ€ฆ

Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates?

Why are we a threat to them?

Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility?

Why was this done in the past?

We knew this type of "attack" was coming.

PREDICTABLE.

FAKE NEWS.

ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY.

Q

 

What part of the highlighted sentence am I taken out of context?

Explain thoroughly, or you just look like a kike protecting an asset

Anonymous ID: bf9252 Jan. 3, 2022, 9:45 p.m. No.15305724   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5737 >>5803

>>15305722

>I tend toward bloatables because I hate to leave out anything, but nobody wants crap notables, so feedback and guidance is always welcome.

You guys never get new nightshift material.

 

JIDF Baker:

>Let me know if anything needs removed

JIDF "Anon"

>XYZ makes the cabal bad, should prolly remove it

JIDF Baker

>Great Idea, I'll delete these 6.