>>15463051 (lb)
see
>>15462908 (lb)
Something to consider anons… we all sat there and read the same fucking headlines in the past 2 breads. So what's different about the notables?
For those who think the notables have to be full of the days news I ask this: why didn't any anon think they were newsworthy enough to take 2 seconds and notable them.
Maybe less is moar?
Maybe anons aren't paying attention?
Maybe I'm and oldfag that should stick to cracking backs?
Time will tell.
o7
scraping now. Will upload to Rumble.
I tried to warn them
If an editorial board of 50 or so anons couldn't take 2 fucking seconds to notable it, is it REALLY news, anon?
This guy's been putting me to sleep for over a month now.
Keep her steady nightshift..
o7