>>15463046 (lb)

>Disagree anon. Old School since 2017 on was just this set of loosely followed rules to get a notable in. All anons were and are peers who review each other's works and when warranted nominate it for notable. It's a process and a proven one at that.

whichever rules are fine by me

as long as they are simple with no BS

>>15463090

>seconding

>actually, it's been around

I mean the OSS version with mandatory seconding, thirding, notabling of baker's notables and whatnot

let's get back to simple

plz

>>15463169

anons are on the battlefields, as instructed by boss

>>15463267

>WHAT IS THE NEWS?

>how broadly should that word be interpreted?

news that match when re-reading crumbs are important

news that contain facts that allow to ask 'counter' questions to initiate 'thought' vs repeat of MSDNC propaganda are important

news that anons identify as relevant are important