dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

>>>/qresearch/16338463 In the 2017–18 school year, 95 percent of public schools reported that they controlled access to school buildings by locking or monitoring doors during school hours

>>>/qresearch/16338464 By the time 2014 rolled around, ALL schools in our area had been retrofitted (and new schools designed with) buzz- in systems, where you could not walk into the school without being buzzed in by the front office.

>>>/qresearch/16338468 Schools have found success in controlling access to facilities during class time.In fact, over 95% of US schools follow this practice.

>>>/qresearch/16338471, >>>/qresearch/16338476 H.B. No. 2654 - relating to building standards for instructional facilities and campus safety procedures for public schools.

>>>/qresearch/16338492 Robb not listed in Uvalde County, and was NOT a polling center - PDF link to ALL district voting stations.

>>>/qresearch/16338581 [R] for Ramos?

>>16339212

Oh look, of course the baker is pushing the @qmcaffee larp account.

What safety and security measures are used in America's public schools?

Response:

Schools use a variety of practices and procedures to promote the safety of students, faculty, and staff. The School Survey on Crime and Safety (SSOCS) collects data on school safety and security practices by asking public school principals about their school’s use of safety and security measures, as well as whether their school had written procedures for responding to selected scenarios and whether it had emergency drills for students. SSOCS also asked schools about the presence of security staff and the availability of trainings for classroom teachers or aides on school safety and discipline provided by the school or school district.1

In the 2017–18 school year, 95 percent of public schools reported that they controlled access to school buildings by locking or monitoring doors during school hours. Other safety and security measures reported by public schools included the use of security cameras to monitor the school (83 percent), a requirement that faculty and staff wear badges or picture IDs (70 percent), and the enforcement of a strict dress code (49 percent). In addition, 27 percent of public schools reported the use of random sweeps for contraband, 20 percent required that students wear uniforms, 9 percent required students to wear badges or picture IDs, and 5 percent used random metal detector checks.

Public schools’ use of various safety and security measures differed by school characteristics during the 2017–18 school year. For example, a greater percentage of primary schools than of middle schools required students to wear uniforms (23 vs. 18 percent), and both percentages were greater than the percentage of high schools requiring uniforms (10 percent); for schools that used the measures of controlling access to school buildings and requiring faculty and staff to wear badges or picture IDs, the same pattern of percentages by school level can be observed. In contrast, greater percentages of high schools and middle schools than of primary schools reported the use of security cameras to monitor the school, the use of random sweeps for contraband, a requirement that students wear badges or picture IDs, and the use of random metal detector checks. For instance, 65 percent of high schools and 50 percent of middle schools reported the use of random sweeps for contraband, compared with 8 percent of primary schools. The percentage of schools reporting the enforcement of a strict dress code was greater for middle schools (62 percent) than for high schools (56 percent), and both percentages were greater than the percentage of primary schools enforcing a strict dress code (43 percent).

https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=334

From journo Jim Stone: http://www.jimstoneindia.com/.zu0.html

A reader sent:

Jim, my youngest son (who is 19 years old now) went to elementary, middle and high school in TX. Three different cities.

By the time 2014 rolled around, ALL schools in our area had been retrofitted (and new schools designed with) buzz- in systems, where you could not walk into the school without being buzzed in by the front office. Parents would literally have to give their name, the name of their student, and the reason for their visit. You would sit outside and wait a couple minutes while the administration and staff verified that your student was a real student at the school.

Once inside, the only place accessible to any visitor was the front office. There was bulletproof glass and / or heavy locked doors leading to all other areas of the school, and this was at multiple schools throughout the years that my son attended. All schools were designed this way! It was done intentionally to stop mass shootings.

There is no way that in 2022 the shooter had access to a classroom.

As school security increasingly becomes a major concern for stakeholders in the education sector, more measures are being explored to protect students and faculty. Schools have found success in controlling access to facilities during class time.In fact, over 95% of US schools follow this practice.

There are a number of ways to control access to the school using several technological methods. Three popular access control tools are:

Security access systems (electronic locks)

Visitor management systems (ID badges)

Vestibules (or kiosks)

Can these security measures work for your school? In this article, we’ll discuss these 3 options in detail, including their features, cost, advantages, and disadvantages.

https://www.besafe.net/news/access-control-systems-that-improve-school-safety/

H.B. No. 2654

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

=='''relating to building standards for instructional facilities and

campus safety procedures for public schools.'''==

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 11, Education Code, is

amended by adding Section 11.007 to read as follows:

Sec. 11.007. BUILDING STANDARDS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL

FACILITIES. (a) In this section, "instructional facility" has the

meaning assigned by Section 46.001.

(b) A school district that constructs a new instructional

facility must comply with the following building and design

standards:

(1) a lock on each entrance door to the building and

classroom door that enables the door to be locked and opened without

a key from inside the building or classroom;

(2) windows on classroom doors that are narrow and

placed on the side of the door away from the door handle;

(3) for a classroom or administrative office wall, the

use of material that is not glass or transparent;

(4) for each window in a classroom or administrative

office, a window covering that may be used to block the view;

(5) a fully functional public address system that can

be clearly heard from each classroom and hallway; and

(6) an adequate number of security cameras to provide

video coverage of each building entrance and hallway.

SECTION 2. Subchapter D, Chapter 12, Education Code, is

amended by adding Section 12.138 to read as follows:

Sec. 12.138. BUILDING STANDARDS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL

FACILITIES. (a) In this section, "instructional facility" has the

meaning assigned by Section 46.001.

(b) An open-enrollment charter school that constructs a new

instructional facility must comply with the following building and

design standards:

(1) a lock on each entrance door to the building and

classroom door that enables the door to be locked and opened without

a key from inside the building or classroom;

(2) windows on classroom doors that are narrow and

placed on the side of the door away from the door handle;

(3) for a classroom or administrative office wall, the

use of material that is not glass or transparent;

(4) for each window in a classroom or administrative

office, a window covering that may be used to block the view;

(5) a fully functional public address system that can

be clearly heard from each classroom and hallway; and

(6) an adequate number of security cameras to provide

video coverage of each building entrance and hallway.

SECTION 3. Subchapter D, Chapter 37, Education Code, is

amended by adding Section 37.116 to read as follows:

Sec. 37.116. CAMPUS SAFETY PROCEDURES. Each school

district and open-enrollment charter school shall adopt and

implement campus safety procedures that provide for the safety of

students and employees, including:

(1) ensuring the live video feed from each security

camera on a district or school campus is readily available to:

(A) the school district police department, if

applicable; or

(B) the dispatch center of a local law

enforcement agency responsible for responding to an emergency at a

campus of the district or school;

(2) requiring school activities to be conducted in a

classroom or in an area with direct access to a secure room, except

for athletic activities that may be held outdoors;

(3) testing the public address system regularly; and

(4) storing and maintaining in the main office of each

district or school campus an active shooter medical kit that

includes tourniquets, bandages, and other supplies that are

typically used to treat an injury involving traumatic blood loss.

SECTION 4. Subchapter C, Chapter 45, Education Code, is

amended by adding Section 45.0572 to read as follows:

Sec. 45.0572. REQUIRED BUILDING STANDARDS. A school

district seeking the guarantee of eligible bonds to be used to fund

construction of a new instructional facility, as defined by Section

46.001, must comply with Section 11.007 in order to be eligible for

>>16339244

cont.

SECTION 5. Section 46.0081, Education Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 46.0081. SECURITY CRITERIA IN DESIGN OF INSTRUCTIONAL

FACILITIES. (a) A school district that constructs a new

instructional facility or conducts a major renovation of an

existing instructional facility using funds allotted to the

district under this subchapter shall consider, in the design of the

instructional facility, appropriate security criteria.

(b) A school district that constructs a new instructional

facility using funds allotted to the district under this subchapter

must comply with Section 11.007.

SECTION 6. Subchapter B, Chapter 46, Education Code, is

amended by adding Section 46.0341 to read as follows:

Sec. 46.0341. REQUIRED BUILDING STANDARDS. Section

46.0081(b) applies to the payment of and application for assistance

under this subchapter.

SECTION 7. As soon as practicable after the effective date

of this Act, each school district and open-enrollment charter

school shall adopt and implement campus safety procedures as

required by Section 37.116, Education Code, as added by this Act.

SECTION 8. Sections 11.007 and 12.138, Education Code, as

added by this Act, apply only to the construction of a new

instructional facility that begins on or after September 1, 2019.

SECTION 9. Subchapter C, Chapter 45, Education Code, as

amended by this Act, and Chapter 46, Education Code, as amended by

this Act, apply only to a school district's application for

guarantee of bonds by the permanent school fund under Subchapter C,

Chapter 45, Education Code, or a school district's application for

state assistance under Chapter 46, Education Code, that is made on

or after September 1, 2019. A school district's application for

guarantee of bonds by the permanent school fund or for state

assistance under Chapter 46, Education Code, that is made before

September 1, 2019, is governed by the law in effect on the date the

application is made, and the former law is continued in effect for

that purpose.

SECTION 10. This Act takes effect immediately if it

receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each

house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.

If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate

effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2019.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220525135107/https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/html/HB02654I.htm

picrel…Robb not listed in Uvalde County, school was NOT being used as a polling center.

PDF link to ALL district voting stations.

https://www.scribd.com/document/575321202/Voting-Locations-in-Bexar-County#download&from_embed

>>16339234 In the 2017–18 school year, 95 percent of public schools reported that they controlled access to school buildings by locking or monitoring doors during school hours.

>>16339237 By the time 2014 rolled around, ALL schools in our area had been retrofitted (and new schools designed with) buzz- in systems, where you could not walk into the school without being buzzed in by the front office.

>>16339239 Schools have found success in controlling access to facilities during class time.In fact, over 95% of US schools follow this practice.

>>16339244, >>16339245 relating to building standards for instructional facilities and campus safety procedures for public schools. H.B. No. 2654

>>16339250 Robb not listed in Uvalde County, school was NOT being used as a polling center.

Notable.

>>16339261

>I just wonder how many fruitless countdowns it's gonna take for people to wake up and see these hoax/LARPs for what they are?

>Some people are seemingly addicted to believing in fantasies.

About as long as it will take for the newfag anons to realize how comp'd /qr/ is now.

Anonymous ID: 80d85e May 25, 2022, 9:41 a.m. No.16339306 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9425

From journo Jim Stone: http://www.jimstoneindia.com/.zu0.html

A reader sent:

Jim, my youngest son (who is 19 years old now) went to elementary, middle and high school in TX. Three different cities.

By the time 2014 rolled around, ALL schools in our area had been retrofitted (and new schools designed with) buzz- in systems, where you could not walk into the school without being buzzed in by the front office. Parents would literally have to give their name, the name of their student, and the reason for their visit. You would sit outside and wait a couple minutes while the administration and staff verified that your student was a real student at the school.

Once inside, the only place accessible to any visitor was the front office. There was bulletproof glass and / or heavy locked doors leading to all other areas of the school, and this was at multiple schools throughout the years that my son attended. All schools were designed this way! It was done intentionally to stop mass shootings.

There is no way that in 2022 the shooter had access to a classroom.

What safety and security measures are used in America's public schools?

Response:

Schools use a variety of practices and procedures to promote the safety of students, faculty, and staff. The School Survey on Crime and Safety (SSOCS) collects data on school safety and security practices by asking public school principals about their school’s use of safety and security measures, as well as whether their school had written procedures for responding to selected scenarios and whether it had emergency drills for students. SSOCS also asked schools about the presence of security staff and the availability of trainings for classroom teachers or aides on school safety and discipline provided by the school or school district.1

In the 2017–18 school year, 95 percent of public schools reported that they controlled access to school buildings by locking or monitoring doors during school hours. Other safety and security measures reported by public schools included the use of security cameras to monitor the school (83 percent), a requirement that faculty and staff wear badges or picture IDs (70 percent), and the enforcement of a strict dress code (49 percent). In addition, 27 percent of public schools reported the use of random sweeps for contraband, 20 percent required that students wear uniforms, 9 percent required students to wear badges or picture IDs, and 5 percent used random metal detector checks.

Public schools’ use of various safety and security measures differed by school characteristics during the 2017–18 school year. For example, a greater percentage of primary schools than of middle schools required students to wear uniforms (23 vs. 18 percent), and both percentages were greater than the percentage of high schools requiring uniforms (10 percent); for schools that used the measures of controlling access to school buildings and requiring faculty and staff to wear badges or picture IDs, the same pattern of percentages by school level can be observed. In contrast, greater percentages of high schools and middle schools than of primary schools reported the use of security cameras to monitor the school, the use of random sweeps for contraband, a requirement that students wear badges or picture IDs, and the use of random metal detector checks. For instance, 65 percent of high schools and 50 percent of middle schools reported the use of random sweeps for contraband, compared with 8 percent of primary schools. The percentage of schools reporting the enforcement of a strict dress code was greater for middle schools (62 percent) than for high schools (56 percent), and both percentages were greater than the percentage of primary schools enforcing a strict dress code (43 percent).

https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=334

As school security increasingly becomes a major concern for stakeholders in the education sector, more measures are being explored to protect students and faculty.Schools have found success in controlling access to facilities during class time.In fact, over 95% of US schools follow this practice.

There are a number of ways to control access to the school using several technological methods. Three popular access control tools are:

Security access systems (electronic locks)

Visitor management systems (ID badges)

Vestibules (or kiosks)

Can these security measures work for your school? In this article, we’ll discuss these 3 options in detail, including their features, cost, advantages, and disadvantages.

https://www.besafe.net/news/access-control-systems-that-improve-school-safety/