>Have we ever tried to read Q drops from the bottom up?
Have you? What did you find?
You should have been here to read them sequentially along with the relevant research provided by the anons of /qresearch.
The most important lesson is to simply read them. There's no secret. Just read them.
you might be responding to what i tagged the other anon in but it does seem really interesting all this Dan BabyFist talk as comms and the same memes and formatting of text come up. Yes that is why i am thinking it is coordinated it is taking into account logically seems to be a word you care a lot about. Then to the accuser thing is a logical there it is again, step, if new q is fake, access had to be given to post to deceive, if deception occurred who are the suspects, then if it is a limited number of people that means certain assets may not be what anons thinks, that is the accusation at least to i think near the termination of thought, if this is the vector of approach this team of anons is doing.
"And the whirlwind 卍 is in the thorn tree
The virgins are all trimming their wicks*
The whirlwind 卍 is in the thorn tree
It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks
Till Armageddon no shalam, no shalom
Then the father hen will call his chickens home
The wise man will bow down before the throne
And at his feet they'll cast their golden crowns
When the man comes around"
>*At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. Five of them were foolish and five were wise.