Anonymous ID: 26d332 Feb. 9, 2023, 11:19 a.m. No.18314694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5093 >>5235 >>5307 >>5364

>>18314679

Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rules/law is unconstitutional and should be struck down or re-written/passed. No mandated vaccine is constitutional. Period.

 

Supreme Court upholds HHS' vaccine requirement for healthcare workers, blocks OSHA's large employer mandate

By Dave Muoio

Jan 13, 2022

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/hospitals/supreme-court-vaccine-covid-19-healthcare-upholds-hhs-vaccine-requirement-for-healthcare

 

“The challenges posed by a global pandemic do not allow a federal agency to exercise power that Congress has not conferred upon it. At the same time, such unprecedented circumstances provide no grounds for limiting the exercise of authorities the agency has long been recognized to have,” the top court wrote in its opinion.

 

Supreme Court Ruling for Requirement Applicable to Health Care Workers

 

In a Jan. 13 decision, the Supreme Court allowed the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to require COVID-19 vaccination for health care workers at Medicare- and Medicaid-certified providers and suppliers.

 

Under the federal health care vaccine requirement, hospitals and other health care facilities must ensure their staff are fully vaccinated or risk losing Medicare and Medicaid funding. The requirement applies to about 10.3 million workers employed by 76,000 health care facilities, including ambulatory surgery centers and nursing homes. The federal requirement was implemented in November 2021.

 

In a survey of more than 1,000 physicians and clinicians, approximately a third disagreed with the vaccine requirements at the time.

widespread resignations among facilities already facing a staffing crunch.

 

the requirement worsens staffing shortages among rural health care facilities and limits their ability to treat patients.

 

Dissenting opinions from Thomas and Alito argued that the “hodgepodge of provisions” and “handful of CMS regulations” cited by the Biden administration provide the authority to enact a nationwide vaccine mandate.

 

“These cases are not about the efficacy or importance of COVID–19 vaccines,” Thomas wrote in his dissent. “They are only about whether CMS has the statutory authority to force healthcare workers, by coercing their employers, to undergo a medical procedure they do not want and cannot undo.”

 

“Neither CMS nor the Court articulates a limiting principle for why, after an unexplained and unjustified delay, an agency can regulate first and listen later, and then put more than 10 million healthcare workers to the choice of their jobs or an irreversible medical treatment,” Alito wrote in his own dissent.

Justices clash over OSHA's public health authority

 

The other decision, regarding the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) large employer mandate, came to a 6-3 vote with Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissenting.

 

Here, the majority acknowledged the “billions of dollars in unrecoverable compliance causes,” “hundreds of thousands” of jobs at risk of walk-offs, thousands of deaths and “hundreds of thousands” of preventable hospitalizations cited by those for and against the requirement.

 

However, the court said that it is “not our role to weigh such tradeoffs” and instead considered whether Congress had “indisputably” provided OSHA with the power to regulate broad public health.

 

“OSHA has never before imposed such a mandate. Nor has Congress,” the court wrote. “Indeed, although Congress has enacted significant legislation addressing the COVID–19 pandemic, it has declined to enact any measure similar to what OSHA has promulgated here.”

 

In a dissent co-penned by Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan, the liberal justices said that the court’s decision ignores COVID-19’s spread through person-to-person contact incurred in “nearly all workplace environments.” As such, OSHA acted under its charge in addressing workplace safety by mitigating infection risk, they wrote.

Anonymous ID: 26d332 Feb. 9, 2023, 11:44 a.m. No.18314810   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5093 >>5235 >>5307 >>5334 >>5363 >>5364

The CIA said Russia blew up the Nord stream pipeline when it was us

 

The CIA said hunters laptop was Russian disinformation when it was real

 

The CIA said trump colluded with Russia while they were colluding with big tech

 

Techno_Fog

You'll want to read this -

 

How the Biden Administration ordered and executed the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines.

 

https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream

 

Seymour Hersh

 

How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline

The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now

Anonymous ID: 26d332 Feb. 9, 2023, 11:49 a.m. No.18314831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5093 >>5235 >>5307 >>5364

https://twitter.com/TruthNinja316/status/1623457951397875712

 

It’s bad enough we likely destroyed the NORD pipeline in violation of God know how many laws…we also tried blaming Russia for it through the Aspen Institute style Intel/MSM hybrid propaganda unit of usual suspects. #IMPEACHBIDEN #DISMANTLECIA

 

https://twitter.com/TruthNinja316

Anonymous ID: 26d332 Feb. 9, 2023, 1:30 p.m. No.18315328   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5337

DEVELOPING! On 28 January Subaru Telescope captured unusual green lights over Hawaii

 

The lights are lasers from NASA Earth's ICESAT 2 satellite, which can measure glacier height, sea ice, forests, lakes and more, and help scientists monitor changing ice sheets in Arctic and Antarctica regions.

 

Scientists now believe the green laser lights that were recorded shooting down from the sky over Hawaii were not from the NASA ATLAS satellite, but instead came from a Chinese "atmospheric monitoring satellite" that studies air pollution.

 

More: https://www.sciencealert.com/ominous-green-lasers-shot-over-hawaii-didnt-come-from-nasa-satellite-after-all

 

@police_frequency