world's biggest clit, with a chubby?
>>18416871 pb
>Millions who rely on Medicaid may be booted from program.
so…. they gave out 20 million fraudulent medicare cards as a means to further fleece the taxpayers during the scamdemic.
nice work if you can get it, i suppose.
HORRIBLE special f/x by a bunch of tards with the collective imagination of a bacterium, and the tech savvy of a rock.
even in ultra slo-mo, a robot wouldn't be that slow.
>…Also: Critical thought is a purely human trait.
if true, that would make (((YOU))) non-human.
crows demostrate a greater capacity for deductive/inductive reasoning and problem solving ability than (((YOUI))). fuck off.
weak bait, shill.
but since you aksed… why would i want to see your mother's festering diseased crotch?
>Yes I think the ai arguing with itself has fallen into a trap.
sys-stat-direct-read-out
malfunctioning bot
non-sequitur… your facts are uncoordinated
warning warning will robinson
i am not programmed to respond in that area
i'm sorry dave, this conversation no longer serves any purpose
>>18415328 pb
>Buy adrenochrome here
>https://www.parchem.com/chemical-supplier-distributor/Adrenochrome-Free-Base-086211.aspx
the structure of adrenochrome has been known for ~ 90 yrs, and it was first synthesized in a lab ~ 80 yrs ago.
as organic compounds go, it's ridiculously simple, and so is its total synthesis from petroleum distillates.
if i wanted adrenochome (i do NOT) i could make it in 2000 gallon batches, no problem, and dirt cheap.
sum ting wong
>modern science is pure ahriman at work
stunningly idiotic statement. how many ACTUAL "scientists" do you know, personally? i am one, i've known and met hundreds upon hundreds, including several nobel prize winners. 99% are God-fearing people of all denominations and faiths, and openly proclaim such. just because the MSM elevates a tiny minority of phony "scientists" (who do no actual science) into the public eye in order to promote the idea that science is anti-God does not make it so. you are a retard or a division shill or both.
vegas odds are on both.
>eating a raped to death childs brain and drinking it's adrenalized blood carries soul.
perhaps. or perhaps that is merely the delusional belief of those that practice it.
>science, and the mindset it breeds, is a disease.
says the fuckwit using a computer, the internet, telecommunications satellites, etc to sperg your troglodytic bullshit. your cushy life as you know it would not exist if it were not for science. on the day that you move into a cave you can get onto your soapbox and disparage science. 'til then, GFY, assbreath.
>but modern science completely denies the existence of spiritual reality
idiotic tripe. there is no one single voice of "modern science" to deny or affirm anything. there are as many differing views as there are people engaged in science.
but since you mention that you lectured (not an actual tenured professor w/ a terminal degree) in physics, the most bankrupt of all "sciences" ever since it was infiltrated, corrupted, and subverted by mathematicians into a bad scifi comic book version of REAL (experimental) science, i can only conclude you are yourself a low-level math geek, and your opinions aren't worth the air needed to utter them.
as for helping me, junior, you better work on educating yourself before you presume to instruct others.
>You can worship God and still make terrible decisions
you mean like priests who molest children?
scientists and engineers are not the only ones guilty of sin. how 'bout YOU?
i think you have zero idea of the sheer volume of scientific research done. there are a hundred thousand research papers published EACH MONTH, just in one discipline. multiply that by the number of scientific disciplines. 99.999% of research is so obscure, arcane and narrowly focused that NO ONE would waste money trying to "corrupt" it. only in the TiNY percentage of areas where gov'ts and corporations have decided to invest is there a financial incentive to "buy" the scientific results that benefit their enterprise. but those same agencies, gov't and corporations, are the source of 99% of research. if you are a climatologist, and you submit a grant proposal for research that will prove global warming is a hoax, you will NEVER see a penny. but if you submit a proposal for research that will support their agenda, the $$ will flow like manna from heaven. if you submit a proposal on integrating the human brain with machines for the stated purpose of developing advanced prosthetics for severely handicapped people, the research grants will shower down on you, but those funding the reseach are the ones who have OTHER ideas of how your results can and will be used. scientists are not saints, they're humans with human flaws. there will always be people willing to sell their integrity and their souls for a steady income.
there IS NO consensus in science. you listen to too much TV. there are libraries full of science that contradicts global warming. YOU never heard of it because your only source of "science" is what the MSM tells you.
>you ever get a squid to work?
not my field. i'm a physical organic chemist.
my casual knowledge is that squids have been in use for quite a long time, now.
but i am familiar with QM enough to know there IS NO "philosophy" associated with it. lame attempts, like the "copenhagen interpretation" only highlight the fact that QM is purely a mathematical artifice, one that supplies "correct" answers to certain questions that match exp within the limits of current tech. but it is NOT a conceptual model of the physical universe. even the bogus SRT and GRT at least grew from a conceptual model (albeit a flawed one).
have you ever heard of a book called "new physics from old" by thomas phipps? (spelling?). i think you might find it enlightening.
>nurses and doctors knew the pandemic was fake
WHOA… how do (((YOU))) know what they knew or didn't know? you're giving drs WAY WAY WAY too much credit. they are NOT scientists. they are diagnosticians. that is ALL they are trained to do, along with handing out pills. 99.9% couldn't tell you how penicillin works, or answer ANY basic science questions. drs, PAs, and nurses i know personally were all taken in by the scam. they are accustomed to believing whatever the gov't, FDA, AMA, CDC, WHO tells them without question. the tiny percentage that are actually competent began questioning the narrative early on. they were silenced. the MSM gave them zero coverage. the gov't threatened to pull their license to practice. what should they have done? allowed themselves to be kicked out of the medical profession, or quietly try to help individuals as best they could?
i have relatives who will go on and on about their brilliant cousin/uncle/whatever, but when i try to tell them their cell phone is cooking their brain, they roll their eyes. in an instant i go from esteemed professor to conspiracy nut. in 1994, i moved from the city to a rural location with no cell service, and no prospect of it ever coming to this area. so far so good. i commuted 2 hrs each way until i retired. there is no wifi in my home. half of my relatives likewise refused to listen to my warnings about the clotshot or the scamdemic. you can lead a jackass to water….
>i work now as a professional scientific editor
any tips on how to get into that line of work? i've had bad experiences with some of the agencies that contract such work out, like cactus, and others i've forgotten their names.
i'm glad i retired when i did, a decade ago. but it only takes a few bad apples to spoil the barrel. it's frustrating, and tempting to throw the baby out with the bathwater, but that solves nothing. publication has always been comped, by one thing or another as it rests in the hands of editors and reviewers who are your competitors. how can two reviewers rave about a manuscript while two others call the same paper trash?
no dr i know ever said that. the mandates came from the gov't NOT from drs.
>Common sense
nothing you wrote is remotely connected to common sense, OR to science.
factually, the planet is getting COOLER, not hotter, as we are about to enter another cycle of glacial expansion that will result in the polar ice caps reaching 2/3rds of the way to the equator. this 15,000 yr cycle will continue until this CURRENT ice age ends, which will be in a few million yrs.
educate yourself…
https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/glad-you-asked/ice-ages-what-are-they-and-what-causes-them/
>Your Argument is invalid.
it wasn't an argument. i stated facts. 99% of drs were not and are not competent to make a scientific conclusion. they're cookbook pill dispensers.
sorry, as far as i am concerned, THAT does not qualify as science, neither the paper or the journal. that is bullshit, pure and simple.
chemistry is science.
biology is science.
experimental phyisics is science.
engineering is science.
all the subdisciplines of the above are science.
if it does not rest upon reproducible testable verifiable experiments, it is NOT science.
ergo, psychology is NOT science, no matter how many fuckwits say it is.
"cultural studies" is NOT science.
anthropology is NOT science.
academic journal ≠SCIENTIFIC journal.
stop painting with such a broad brush, or you are guilty of exactly what you're accusing them of doing.
THE GOV'T ISSUED MANDATES… NOT DRS
>Got bright hs agers in the fam but warned them to be VERY careful about negotiating the minefield that passes for education these days
same. but even as a prof, i encouraged most of my students to drop out and get a real job, bcs they were wasting their daddy's money. admin doesn't like that. i would never encourage anyone to go to college. learn a trade. most college grads have useless majors, most NEVER get a job that requires a diploma, and most never earn enough to pay for their diploma.