16 MAR, 08:58

Russia thwarts over 90,000 cyberattacks on electoral resources on March 15

The cyberattacks can be tracked down to Ukraine and IP addresses of Western Europe and North America, Head of Solar Company Igor Lapunov specified

MOSCOW, March 16. /TASS/.Over 90,000 cyberattacks on Russia’s electoral resources were thwarted on the first day of the country’s presidential election, Rostelecom Senior Vice President for Information Security, Head of Solar Company Igor Lapunov said via video conferencing in the Central Election Commission (CEC) on Saturday.

"Over 90,000cyberattacks were carried out against electoral web portals, the resources of the CEC and online voting and Gosuslugi[the public services portal]. This is a large number, whichexceeds by eight times the amount of cyberattacks registered on the Single Vote Day last year. All the attacks were repulsed," he said.

The cyberattacks can betracked down to Ukraine and IP addresses of Western Europe and North America, he specified.

"Judging by the professionalism of cyberattacks, we can understand that professional, special groups are working," he said.

The Federation Council, the upper house of Russia’s parliament, officially designated March 17, 2024 as the day of the presidential election. The Central Election Commission (CEC) then announced that voting will take place over three days on March 15-17.

Four candidates are vying for the top office, namely New People party nominee Vladislav Davankov; self-nominated candidate and incumbent President Vladimir Putin; Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) nominee Leonid Slutsky; and Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) nominee Nikolay Kharitonov.

MOSCOW, March 16. /TASS/. Western countries’ statements that they don’t recognize Russia’s election are a problem for themselves, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.—

"Just look, they have been saying for several months that elections in Russia must not be held that they would not let them happen," she said during an event organized by the Russian Znanie Society. "But when they understood that the election will ultimately take place and that the voting will be organize both in our country and for those Russians who are staying abroad <…>, when they (Western countries - TASS) understood that we would organize polling stations there (abroad - TASS), despite their intimidation and aggressive rhetoric,they proceeded to the next stage - they began warning that they would not recognize this election. This is their own problem. This is our election, our country. What have they to do with it?"

https://tass.com/politics/1760453

(Interesting “the West” politicians accuse Russia of interfering in US elections. It never happened but the West will do it to Russia)

>>20575841 Kash Patel - Congressional death blossom

>>20570891 House May Refer January 6 Committee Members for ProsecutionPNs

Republicans must fight back and punish the J6 otherwise they will continueto destroy our country and break the law!

The whole Democrats and fake Republicans in congress continues to break the law, the more they do.Reps HAVE TO start prosecuting them, all of them and bring Federal RICO charges against the whole J6 Committee Pelosi, Schiff, along with the hired aids, investigators (which may total 150 in total etc) who served on this fake and illegal committee. If anyone or group in Congress was involved, they all need to charged with Federal and State RICO laws. This committee fits the definition==. The Committee at a bare minimum used $34 million on this sham: (partial definition)

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.

Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in courtbecause it focuses on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts.[4]

An Act relating to the control of organized crime in the United States

Enterprise defined

There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise. Either the defendant(s):

invested the proceeds of the pattern of racketeering activity into the enterprise (18 U.S.C. § 1962(a)); or

acquired or maintained an interest in, or control of, the enterprise through the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (b)); or

conducted or participated in the affairs of the enterprise "through" the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (c)); or

conspired to do one of the above (subsection (d)).[5]

The US Supreme Court noted that a commentator had used the terms"prize","instrument","victim", or"perpetrator"for these four relationships.[6]

Civil suits

RICO also permits a private individual "damaged in his business or property" by a "racketeer" to file a civil suit. The plaintiff must prove the existence of an "enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise; in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same.[7]

A civil RICO action can be filed in state or federal court.[8]

Both the criminal and the civil components allow the recovery of treble damages (triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).[citation needed]

Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict and or sanction individuals for their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or retribution for cooperating with federal law enforcement or intelligence agencies.

Violations of the RICO laws can be alleged in civil lawsuit cases or for criminal charges. In these instances, charges can be brought against individuals or corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement. Further, charges can also be brought against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.

Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who use the courts as a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers or victims or to silence another's speech. RICO could be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers or their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been brought before the courts.[citation needed]

Although the RICO laws may cover drug trafficking crimes in addition to other more traditional RICO predicate acts such as extortion, blackmail, and racketeering, large-scale and organized drug networks are now commonly prosecuted under the Continuing Criminal Enterprise Statute, also known as the "Kingpin Statute". The CCE laws target only traffickers who are responsible for long-term and elaborate conspiracies, whereas the RICO law covers a variety of organized criminal behaviors.[70]

>>20576914

Remember Trump’s RICO lawsuit, all of the crimes charged. Original 193 page filing. KEK PDJT did all the work for Kash, Rudy for sure, since he the master RICO prosector The J6 committee fits perfectly. In Trump’s lawsuit, they all argued the “Statute of Limitations” prevented him from filing but the J6 committee resurrected it!

The number of counts in the original lawsuit remains the same; below is the list from the First Amended Complaint and the defendants against whom the individual counts are alleged.

Count I – RICO

(18 U.S.C. § 1962(C))

Including Theft of Trade Secrets (18 U.S.C. § 1832), Obstruction of Justice(18 U.S.C. § 1512), and Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)

(Against Clinton, Clinton Campaign, DNC, Perkins Coie, Elias, Sussmannn, Fusion GPS, Joffe)

Count II – RICO Conspiracy

(18 U.S.C. § 1962(D))

(Against Clinton, Clinton Campaign, DNC, Perkins Coie, Sussmann, Dolan, Sullivan, Podesta, Mook, Reines, Elias, Fusion GPS, Simpson, Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Orbis Ltd., Steele, Danchenko, Neustar, Inc., Neustar Security Services, and Joffe)

Count III – Injurious Falsehood

(Against Clinton, Sullivan, Schultz, Schiff, Danchenko, Sussmann, and Steele)

Count IV – Conspiracy to Commit Injurious Falsehood

(Against Clinton, Clinton Campaign, DNC, Perkins Coie, Sussmann, Dolan, Sullivan, Podesta, Mook, Reines, Elias, Fusion GPS, Simpson, Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Orbis Ltd., Steele, Danchenko, Neustar, Inc., Neustar Security Services, and Joffe)

Count V – Malicious Prosecution

(Against Sussmann, Elias, Danchenko, Fritsch, Simpson, Nellie Ohr, Steele, Joffe, Comey, Rosenstein, McCabe, Strzok, Page, and Clinesmith)

Count VI – Conspiracy to Commit Malicious Prosecution

(Against Clinton, Sussmann, Schultz, Dolan, Sullivan, Elias, Simpson, Fritsch, Steele, Ohr, Danchenko, Joffe, Podesta, Mook, Reines, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Strzok, Page, and Clinesmith)

Count VII – Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

(18 U.S.C. § 1030)

(Against Neustar, Inc., Neustar Security Services, Joffe, DNC, Clinton Campaign, Clinton, Perkins Coie, Sussmann)

Count VIII – Theft of Trade Secrets

(18 U.S.C. § 1830-32)

(Against Neustar, Inc., Neustar Security Services, Joffe, Perkins Coie, Sussmann, Clinton Campaign, DNC, and Clinton)

Count IX – Stored Communications Act

(18 U.S.C. 2701-12)

(Against Neustar, Inc. and/or Neustar Security Services, and Joffe)

Count X – Agency

(Against Clinton)

Count XI – Respondeat Superior/Vicarious Liability

(Against Perkins Coie)

Count XII – Respondeat Superior/Vicarious Liability

(Against the DNC)

Count XIII – Respondeat Superior/Vicarious Liability

(Against the Clinton Campaign)

Count XIV – Respondeat Superior/Vicarious Liability

(Against Fusion GPS)

Count XV – Respondeat Superior/Vicarious Liability

(Against Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd)

Count XVI Respondeat Superior/Vicarious Liability

(Against Neustar, Inc and/or Neustar Security Services)

https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/trumps-24-million-rico-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-nearly-doubles-in-size-and-seeks-to-sidestep-legally-fatal-flaw-in-original-paperwork/

>>20576972

I really think that Trump’s lawsuit will be the basis of things Kash and others investigate. Trump withdrew the filing, but i have no doubt that the J6 was just and expansion and continuim of the RICO conspiracy because many of the charges have been shouted and repeated for years. I think all the media that still shout lies that were debunked by Durham report. The media knows now they are repeating the same lies, so they have no excuse of not knowing. Everything the J6 did just a furtherance of the RICO conspiracy so the Statute of Limitations have never ended even today. The willing media is the mechanism of the RICO conspiracy happening now and into the future. In addition these fakes lawsuits are part of the never ending persecution and lies. All the attys and judges need to be included in the scheme

I would love to see the entire Trump Team prosecuting them in an honest court of law. Future proves past or vice versa

>>20576972

In the Trump The lawsuit , it contains this sections below, and was applicable then, and is apropos today and still ongoing but a vast universe of new names and organizations. Soros and company should be included

“In the amended complaint, Trump alleges that he “has been injured in his business and property as a direct and proximate result of” the allegations.

Specifically (from paragraphs 614 to 616):

As a direct and proximate result of the RICO Defendants’ racketeering activity described herein, numerous unfounded investigations, including the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation and its full field Alfa Bank investigation, numerous congressional investigations, and Special Counsel investigations were commenced; countless false, damaging, and defamatory articles and media stories of all types (televisions, radio, internet, etc.) were published, resulting in the widespread dissemination of false, damaging and defamatory accusations of Plaintiff’s purported collusion with Russia which became years-long headline story that irreparable, unjustly and permanently tarnished Plaintiff’s political reputation.

As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been injured in his business and property and has incurred and will continue to incur, significant damages, losses, and deprivation of tangible and intangible property, including but not limited to loss of political and/or business reputation, loss of business opportunities, loss of competitive position, loss of business revenue, loss of goodwill, loss of trade secrets, and/or loss of contractual relations, and has suffered actual, compensatory, special, incidental, and consequential damages in addition to costs of defense and attorneys’ fees.

Among other things, the Plaintiff was forced to incur expenses in an amount to be determined at trial, but known to be in excess of twenty-four million dollars ($24,000,000) and continuing to accrue, in the form of defense costs, legal fees, and related expenses incurred in connection with his effort to defend against the RICO Defendants’ actions and the various federal investigations and/or official proceedings which arose therefrom, in addition to the loss of existing and future business opportunities for himself, the Trump Campaign, and the Trump Organization LLC.

https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/trumps-24-million-rico-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-nearly-doubles-in-size-and-seeks-to-sidestep-legally-fatal-flaw-in-original-paperwork/

THE REAL COMMANDER IN CHIEF!! He’s coming!!! This is greatThe ending is funny

0:58

https://rumble.com/embed/v4gwt5c/?pub=4

Lara Trump:CONGRATULATIONS SCOTT!!! GREAT THINGS AHEAD! The RNC is hiring Scott Pressler

This is justice and phenomenal, Ronna would never hire him.

1:26

https://rumble.com/embed/v4gvp7n/?pub=4

Wow:This is not a Parodyby il Trumpo, Ben Shapiro said this and it actually happened, he said he’d walk over broken glass for Donald Trump

BOOOOOOOM!!!😎

2:57

https://rumble.com/embed/v4gv8px/?pub=4

Mediaite

Trump Critic Ben Shapiro Is Now Hosting a Fundraiser For Trump: ‘I Will Walk Over Broken Glass to Vote For Him’

Story by Phillip Nieto •

Daily Wire co-founder Ben Shapiro, long a harsh critic of former President Donald Trump, announced he will be hosting a fundraiser for him next week.

Shapiro explained on a Friday podcast that he’s co-hosting the upcoming fundraiser for Trump. He justified his shift towards the former president by claiming Joe Biden is the worst commander-in-chief of his lifetime, adding he would “walk over broken glass” to vote for the Republican nominee.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-critic-ben-shapiro-is-now-hosting-a-fundraiser-for-trump-i-will-walk-over-broken-glass-to-vote-for-him/ar-BB1jYlOc

>>20577249

A lot of the never Trumpers will be pulled in by Ben Shapiro. The world is changing.

Trump Dayton Ohio rally today? What time is it on?