>>23787168 (pb)
no, the person was instigating and being a pest.
He knew that they would be triggered.
his arrest is HIS OWN FAULT.
Plus he sinfully enticed them and thus is like a demon.
if he knew that they would be triggered he shouldn't have behaved like that.
>>23787181 (pb)
sadly the stupidity of being man handled and arrested is the fault of the guy who instigated the situation, believe or don't believe in the devil, anon. The smart person doesn't taunt the lion.
taunting people that are known to be easy to trigger is NOT correct behavior no matter what you think your rights are.
the person knows that he'll get beaten and arrested and does it anyway: that is the height of stupidity.
plus it's immoral to trigger people into sinful behavior.
what it shows is a total lack of charity towards police. It shows a persona so broken that it's willing to allow it self to be greviously harmed because it deludes it's correct to pester people, either police or others.
instigation might be seen as 'lawful' by inverted people, and in the case of those who taunt the police clearly the demons that live within the minds of those who taunt the police get off and feed on the harm that they cause those 'exercising' their 'constitutional rights'
the police need to be loved just like anyone else with agape love. And yet the instigators treat the police as if they are subhuman deserving of being triggered into vengeful behavior.
rights or no rights: the one who is beaten and gets brain damage is the one who is the loser.
youdon't see it but they caused their own problems. They failed to treat the police as fellow humans, and they failed to protect themselves from harm from buff and ready to stomp guys.
that kind, who taunts police, are losers, looking for attention, and dangerous and possessed with evil intention.
>that kind, who taunts police, are losers, looking for attention, and dangerous and possessed with evil intention.
another point: look how you can't open your mind even when it's clearly presented to you:
the person taunting the police plays the role of Satan.
we are all sinners. you know this, I know this.
Police are too.
the Satan inspired taunt the police to induce a beat down: they fail to see the police as humans who also have a right to privacy and to not be mocked and taunted, or filmed without permission (despite what you claim is 'the law').
the intention of the one filming is clear: to invoke an incident and cause trouble for men at work who are merely having a time to talk to each other.
and then for you to argue that my debunking of your attention seeking creep who filmed the police and the reasoning that 'it's constitutional' when actually it's sinful to try and provoke people into violence, who cares what the constitution says.
so you want people to be sinful and dehumanize police and taunt them and provoke them because of your putting the constitution above the rule of common decency.
and then the cherry on top: you falsly claim that I am 'criminal' for presenting you my rational and well thought out point of view.
not to mention you're down there at the crotch of the police officers in your mind fantasizing about servicing them (but projecting it on me.
you're beyond rediculous.
May you fall madly in love with an officer of the law and finally understand that they are good people with kind heart who have to be the lion in the room, and NOT put up with BS like you dish out, lusting after them secretly.
just give into it: you need a strong person to love and have no one to fill the bill so you demonize those strong men who you wish would love you (and they do but you are blind to it).
grow up, shut up, and be more respectful
still projecting your desire to be at the crotch onto others.
you're not an adult person, no matter how mature you think you are, how old you are, you think like an immoral and corrupted adolescent.
you curse people like you breath, which is essentially cursing your self and you present the devil-narrative as if it presents a scinario of constitutional rights being respected.
you're free, anon, you're free
to lust and want to cause harm to good people and to project your desires onto others.
what are you not free of? well you seem unable to love others in a way that doesn't make them into objects of lust or to cast them as 'evil' because they don't like being treated disrespectfully.
look at you: talking about filming police as a 'right' and then casting a curse for people's eyes to fall out.
you are possessed and sick of heart and mind. you need to reform and repent.
I suggest that you learn about how to cast out your demons. First you must admit that you have them.
your a lame shill.
the stuff you say shows you as possessed if you're a real person.
it's a serious matter.
you need to free yourself but instead you keep thinking that your terse BS is some kind of meaningful counter foil.
I've told you what you need to do.
you can either keep smack talking or find out how to learn about your own past, examine your consciousness, confess your sins, admit your demonic tendancies, and tell the demons to leave.
your in a serious free fall, and the only person who can help you is yourself.
and instead you play 'shill insult'
telling me what I like and don't like?
there is no time left for you from me.
I've told you and you don't listen.
my point: if you lose your soul 'exercising your constitutional rights' you're in a dire condition and a very sad person.
of course the constitution is important.
no one is going to save you but yourself.
>>23787674
maybe we could spell it "I'm smarter than yore" to really confuse the grammar shill.
>>23787679
and another one.
are you going to do the 'false psychiatrist' bit.
the fragment of scripture quoter.
is that all you know? silver and a plank?
you forgot the 'love your neighbor as yourself'
the one who films police without the police wanting that is NOT loving their neighbor as themself in my estimation.
isn't the sin in dehumanizing the police and failing to treat them with respect?
isn't the sin in triggering them into sinful behavior ( a beatdown or false arrest)?
if you know someone is stepping off a cliff do you not pull them back and keep them from falling to their death? Even if they say 'take care of the mote in your own eye, and leave me alone'.
There are moral obligations in this life.
and those, like you, who fragment-quote and throw buzz words around, and wish for the ill and harm of those with whom you converse, are certainly at the edge of the precipice ready to fall in.
but it may infact me 'unknowingly' because you're lost in a strong delusion.
>>23787713
don't we all.
so what do you think: is it OK to 'exercise your constitutional rights' even if you know that it will trigger others into beating you and putting you into the hospital?
be honest.
when you say 'Police are . . . .'
that's the part where you demonize them.
that's that part that is YOU stepping off the cliff and falling.
you further compound it by playing the role of satan with the police: accusing them and putting them to the test.
it's not love what you do, it's vindictive and mean.
projecting again?
pig pile on the person with the logical opposing argument.
let me ask you what I asked the otherone (who seems as though his posts were deleted)
is it sane behavior to 'exercise your constitutional rights' even if you know that it will trigger others into beating you and putting you into the hospital?
or is it indicative of a mental state of self-loathing and a failure to look after your own welfare?
the false accuser
there you go again with your unsubstantiated false accusations, which are infact just marxist talking points.
do you think if the police were abolished and your marxist overlords (who programmed you to hate the police) were in full control that there wouldn't immediately be some kind of 'new police' but far worse and much more immoral than the current group?
did you post to the wrong person?
when you IP hop maybe you loose track of who is in the discussion.
your truth doesn't have a capital 'T'.
and it's not 'truth' but your slanderous non-substantiated accusations.
'we' 'as a nation'.
anon I see individuals. People are on their own to do their own battle against the wicked forces of sinful desire.
and demonize men who are there to protect and to serve seems to be a moral failure to me.
and instigating otherwise good men to trigger them into doing bad things seems wrong as well.
you're all about collective blame.
you imagine some 'we' and some 'holy law' of the secular world.
if you can't love them you can't love Him.
Jesus loves them very very much. Why can't yo love them even a little?
you use your 'rights under the constitution' and some false idea that you're being violated as an excuse to dehumanize millions of working men and to justify accusing them of violating your rights , and as an excuse to NOT love them and do what is right for them.
courts are secular, not of God. Many judges are not good people and do not rule fairly.
same with everyone. There is a tendency of all of us to be selfish.
hating men in uniform just makes you have a harder time following what is right and just.
Jesus loves you. He'll give you the insight to overcome your constitution fetish, and your fetish to be 'respected and have your rights respected'
maybe if we change the subject . . .
do you want a cracker?
you sound like a parrot.
you project that I am 'the accuser' meanwhile making a false blanket statement about all police.
Could you be any less aware?
how about those globalists and their attempts to profiteer off of climate alarmism and cutting down a large swatch of forest to make a road to their conference in the rain forest?
how about those old Avalon Hill book shelf games? Weren't they just loads of fun!
my position is pretty clear.
I've stated it over and over.
I don't need to give you examples.
you're just harping on a subject about which you've ignore all my points from previous posts.
what you're doing is an obvious shill effort to waste my time.
I've done enough and if you didn't get my message it's because you aren't bothering to read my posts or try to understand what I've said.
provoking others into violence is sinful.
using violence against them after that doubled down on the sinning.
'respect your constitutional rights and pave a road to Pergatory'
not too smart no matter what secular law says about it.
'supossed to'
live in the real world and stop wasting my time.
you don't care what I have to say, you just want to keep wasting my time.
projection from the accuser.