Anonymous ID: a4f9a9 Aug. 18, 2018, 1:12 a.m. No.2654401   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4437

>>2653678

 

Re: the start of the Cabal

 

From what I can tell there was a long period of instability following the catastrophe - the breakdown at the end of the Ice Age c10,500BC was followed by a second melt c7,500BC. If we use the Zodiac as a marker (thinking precession of the Equinoxes), then the first sign that starts to appear in art is the sign of Taurus, which was c4,500 - c2,300BC, which maps to the Egyptian Old Kingdom. The Old Kingdom came to an end c2,200BC and Egypt fell into decline and didn't really get started again until the New Kingdom c1,500BC, which is the age of Aries. I think of this as Egypt's 'Hollywood' period and if I have to nail the start of the Cabal to a particular period in history this is it.

 

This is the period when the gods became important in the daily lives of people, when the priests started with their sex rituals and the Pharoah was deemed a living god. The 'right of Kings' can be traced to this period. Historically, when the gods roamed the Earth, Ra gave them ownership over the humans, who were to be treated as cattle (where have we heard that line before?). It would therefore follow that the Pharoahs with their divine right of Kings, as incarnations of the gods, could do what they wished with their human herd.

 

My guess is that the Cabal and their bloodlines all fall out from this period.

Anonymous ID: a4f9a9 Aug. 18, 2018, 3:34 a.m. No.2654930   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4964

>>2654437

 

I'm assuming at the moment that the Cabal behaviour is a Western thing, which originated in Babylon/Egypt and spread to Greece and later Rome.

 

I don't know enought about India and China to comment, but both civilisations appear on the surface to be less barbaric than their Western counterparts. It's difficult to know about north America, but it looks like there was race of giants whose existence has been purposefully erased. The Incas and the Aztecs were certainly into their sacrifices, but both were fairly late on in the scheme of things.

 

The Inca philosophy of sacrifice appears to have been driven by a need to stave off natural disasters. The theory was, that if an earthquake would kill 100,000 people randomly across the country, then sacrificing 100,000 people in a central location would appease the gods in the same way, stop the earthquake from happening and allow the rulers to choose eho was going to die. I have pondered whether there might be similar thinking going on within the Cabal mindset.