Anonymous ID: c01393 Aug. 24, 2018, 5:49 p.m. No.2727775   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7829 >>7838

>>2727697

whats your rationale that its 5d; I mean obviously youre limited to 3d representations, and you can explain the relationship between polygons and degrees and other shapes and degrees, in the same manner Carl Sagan did, but each of those shapes are made by co-ordinates within a sphere.

 

As far as time, all of that is coming from the fair assumption that the speed of your big bang , or initial happening, even-time-marker occurs evenly from the origin.

 

Im thinking outloud; I can explain why I think 5d exists, and I think I can even prove it matter of factly how it is occurring. RIGHT now between you and I and anons here. But I cannot do it through 3 dimensional geometry

 

Maybe you can, maybe I dont quite see what you are saying Geo-anon.

 

Oh, sorry for fucking with you the other night; Very High on weed.

Anonymous ID: c01393 Aug. 24, 2018, 5:52 p.m. No.2727819   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2727759

the desire to see totally requires being bigger than one side or view point.

 

It can also make a man manic, which is why he is the way he is.

 

But I think hes coming full circle now, you do that enough times and you become something bigger than what you were before.

Anonymous ID: c01393 Aug. 24, 2018, 6:05 p.m. No.2727948   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7990

>>2727829

i like the 'primer' you have in the corner of first image, ill think on it. Are you saying there is… NO limit to the speed of light? That our measurement of light speed limit based on our relative body and earth physics? "c" = a sub-light limit?

 

ok and on the last sentence, it really yields a mandelbrot?

 

So we mentally add motion in our mental image of the 3d one to represent 4d shapes, and so on. The images above describe a shape in flux to another, which is appropriate since we call 4th, time.

 

Ok, GW.

Anonymous ID: c01393 Aug. 24, 2018, 6:19 p.m. No.2728099   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2727977

truthful speech is a selection mechanism that rectifies pathological heirarchies which is how we imagine the existence of consciousness trying to elevate being…

 

not so hard; I mean he is tackling the nature of TRuth and Speech for goodness sake.

 

Peterson is saying What we regard as truthful speech is really a mechanism whereby we select ways to think better therefore do better; which is how we see ourselves and all of consciousness evolving…

 

EZ, and it makes sense.

 

Did peterson say something you didnt like? I like him.

 

Btw the video is funny; its good , i didnt like him for like 10 seconds, just from having watched it lol.

Anonymous ID: c01393 Aug. 24, 2018, 6:39 p.m. No.2728322   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8348 >>8424

>>2727990

well I always felt c didnt make sense…

 

Consider this…

 

A galactic year = 250million years (Sun makes ONE rotation around galactic center)

 

Translated into perceived age of universe thats 60 rotations the sun has made since the beginning of this explanation of the universe.

 

So when you visually mark that and see spirals going away from the origin , and noting only 60 rotations worth… something is terribly off in our way of accepted thinking and C could not explain how the universe could do that unless they accept that c is not fixed.

 

What i can clearly see, I dont know if I can flatten it out in words here: would say Earth inherited sub sets of physics specific to earth, and all systems have their subsets, and the set that should rule universal origin, (assuming) one at big bang would have rules, frequencies, shapes, that contain those physic sets.

 

Ive heard of that example too anon at 2 bodies accelerating away at c.

 

The shape , am I perceiving it as intended if I see the 'face' slightly facing right, and then rotating, say clockwise, relative to me the observer? with cubes in flux, into larrger spinning cube repeating?>

 

Again we can probably find ways to visually represent what we mean but it is difficult.

_