>>2745747

We are told "We have it all" - and we believe it. The question is not if they have the evidence but how do they 'play' it.

If the pardons are real, do you expose the 'old' crimes (email server, wiener server, dnc server, anwan server) first and then the pardons are exposed - allowing them to "get off"? The outrage would be enormous and completely wreck the mid-terms. Then the newly reconstituted DOJ & FBI could go after them with the 'sting' material from after 1/20/17.

Does POTUS 'allow' the pardons to stand but then ship them off to be tried in SA?

Does POTUS expose BHO as a fraud and then strip them of the pardons?

There are lots of plays when you hold all the Trump cards.

>>2749006

I found it on reddit but the poster said it was from the chans - so the author really is anon.

https:// www.reddit. com/r/greatawakening/comments/9ag5w3/obamas_secret_pardons_a_theory_about_how_evil/

>>2748919

>>2745747

The SA trial option is almost revenge porn - I can see her being carried by two big Saudis, where one of her curtain dresses to the 'block'.

Ah fantasies!

>>2749090

It's just another source of anons, scouring the web for info. It also is a good break when the shills take over a loaf.

>>2749162

you really give a shit where info is found? Did you read the theory of BHO pardoning? POTUS has mentioned it, in a round about way.

The dig is How would BHO's pardons effect the way POTUS/Q release the evidence that they have?

Could the pardons be a reason that a lot of docs are not being released - in other words covered under the pardons ?

Or could the pardons be played as soon as one of the 'big' players like JB or HRC are indited?

Will POTUS expose the pardons and say - there is nothing to be done - pardons are solid?

Or will he expose BHO as a fraud - nullifying the pardons?

Or does he extradite them to be tried in SA for a real close haircut?

WWG1WGA - it is not chan exclusive

>>2749299

Another "hands up" moment?

As he been given his binary option?

1) Self-Execute on this day at this time - The No Name option

or

2) Be exposed and completely destroyed?

I think the "No Name" option was an example to many. Like GHWB, WJC, RBG… Lots of very old sickly (evil) people who could take this option.

>>2749308

Ding DING

We have a winner1

#1 arrogant ass

>>2749335

It's a theory, but it's never been tested. How would / could another POTUS remove an existing pardon?

I believe the 2017 sting operation has everything covered - but exposing presidential pardons to BHO's admin would completely destroy their party and support.