BAKER
Why is this in Notables?
>>4750099 ; >>4750145 ; >>4750501 Marketfag Updates
#1- Neither of these Notables received ONE nomination.
#2- Should this board be supporting stocks? Giving financial advice?
#3- Several Anons posted on Night Shift that they__ had taken 8Chan stock advice and LOST money 2 weeks ago__. These Anons were angry.
Yes, they were incorrect to have taken advice from a stranger on the internet but is this something Bakers and Q support? Financial advice interwoven with research? Advice that could very well be good just as much as it could be detrimental?
Today's Notables represent Gold up $2 dollars (TWO dollars) and Silver down 2 cents. These moves are NOT at all significant in the very least.
Then we have the VYSTAR info. It's worse than a penny stock. Yes it's up today and yes the Anon did recommend it yesterday. But it's still only up a FRACTION of ONE PENNY.
So why Baker? No nominations, NOT remarkable moves and NOT what I see Q supporting.
IT'S NOT RESEARCH.
Along with that, brokers that give financial advice are required by law to provide clientele with disclaimers per banking law and mostly to cover their asses and avoid litigation. Yet Baker is supporting this activity without any such disclaimers at all from an anonymous source from the bowels of the internet.
BTW- NO stock activity can be sauced as far as future gains- NO SAUCE = No Notable, right?
WHY BAKER?
[NOTE TO MarketFag: Will NOT be entertaining your diatribe. This Anon is not the only one that believes this info doesn't belong here- there are many of us. WWG1WGA]
-
What if this is another ploy to compromise this board by those who seek to harm our movement?