Why hasn't Q responded to your clock theory, thereby confirming it?
>Q has responded
Why hasn't Q responded to a post with the "Qclock" in it, thereby confirming it?
A clock doesn't have a date ffs.
>This is the clockthread you fuckhead.
So I came here with a differing opinion.
Is that not allowed here?
Only group think is allowed in this containment thread?
>Now, pretty please, leave, if you can't contribute constructively!
I'm trying to have a debate, it's not my fault you're incapable of having one.
It's you who can't contribute constructively because you're triggered I have a differing opinion, which has been acknowledged by Q in several posts I should add.
>weakling/liar
Look at my graphic, there's nothing I'm lying about.
I've tried to talk with you all about this, but never get anywhere, so excuse the abrasiveness.
>the hypothesis
KEK anon, you know it's not pushed as a theory or hypothesis.
At least be honest about that.
I just want to have a debate about the clock, debate is what we're here on the chans and /qresearch/ for.
I couldn't when I didn't have anything to back up my theory, but now I do so I'm trying to.
Yet I can't
>Have a good night, and WWG1WGA!
You too anon, WWG1WGA.
>How do you explain this if it is just nonsensical graphics?
ffs, anons have been over this with you, how can those be seconds and minutes in the same graphic?
You """mirrored""" a timestamp just to fit your narrative. I could go on. That graphic has no legitimate use or meaning.
You probably wouldn't know, the [#] markers are either for a delta or an event, person, place, etc.
The entire basis and context Q was using the clock in was for deltas. Anons came up with a theory, that was directly acknowledged by Q/
>Not sure about your motivations DeltaFag
The famefaggotry is unwarranted, fake, and gay because the entire shit you fap to is unconfirmed.
>Don't waste our bread
This bread is a waste, debating and telling you I disagree is the best thing for this shit containment thread.
You all think your unconfirmed shit is holy, and you all act like it in the breads.
This isn't shilling like you all claim, it's facts.
>Your problem is your ego.
<clockfag
KEK!!!!
For example, you use what Q is saying is the 13 minute mark IN THE VIDEO, as proof by flipping the timestamp. That is fucking retarded.
Again, I could go on.
>How is it fame faggotry?
You should probably figure out what other """clockfags""" are doing.
1. 2/7 and [:02]
You arbitrarily attribute Q talking 2 minutes and assume that correlates to your "clock" when it was posted on the 7th, without taking into account the context Q posted it in.
2. 2/10 and [:05]
You correlate the [5] marker to being a minute marker, when that is being used as a non-delta marker again disregarding the context. The post number is irrelevant imo. They change all the time. Like the "confirmation of all confirmations" you guys tried to push getting btfo'd.
3. #7
Again, the post number of /GA/ isn't the post number totally, and equating a post # to a minute/second (kek) marker is ridiculous.
Don't even know what you're trying to imply as that being a "proof".
4. 4/19 and [:31]
Again, this is ridiculous. Q is talking about the 13 minute marker in the video. You """mirroring""" the second timestamp is a stretch just to fit your graphic.
5. [:23]
You are using seconds to fit your graphic, then using minutes in the SAME crumb to fit your graphic.
Pick one.
6. 1/13
Again, you used a post number and equated it with a minute/second (kek) marker, then implied because it is a straight line across the face of the only useable part of this "clock", it's proof of something.
7. [:53]
You are using minutes to fit your graphic, then using seconds in the SAME crumb to fit your graphic.
Pick one.
You EQUATE things that are NOT the same.
Minutes, seconds, post numbers, text irrelevant to this entire thing, and dates. They're not equal.
You have no real methodology, no real meaning to anything you produce, and it's unconfirmed and UNACKNOWLEDGED by Q yet you push it as if it is.
<Why don't you go do something productive
kek, don't need a clockfag telling me to do something productive
< Shilling/trolling other Anons really doesn't qualify.
That's your clockfag NPC response, and that's why anons think you're all fucking jokes and famefaggots (which you should be aware of ffs, if you're not, you're blind).
No one can have this conversation with any of you (you especially, I recognize your petulance), because you can't defend it and just assume anyone attacking you is a shill due to your arrogance and ignorance.
Reminder, the other theory for the clock has been acknowledged by Q several times, and not once has anyone tried to famefag or anything off of it, because it's for the board, not you.
But I'm a shill, top kek
THE CLOCK
Q lays out the meaning and use of The Clock, starting on 1/7/18, but foreshadowed about The Clock on 1/6/18.
>Q 477 1/6/18
>Timestamp.
>Decipher.
>Think clock.
>Wind the clock w/ all markers.
There are several kinds of markers, but Q defines they are noted in Q 2349 as [Markers].
What is commonly referred to as a "killbox", is really just a marker.
People, places, events, words, letters, and numbers can be markers. There are two different number markers however. There are normal numbers signifying something related to the crumb, but also Delta Markers.
Q had already demonstrated before this crumb that deltas are relevant and important for comms. Q had confirmed the [5], [10], and [15] Delta Markers before this crumb, summarized in Q 455 when Q said "Graphics should be in same time zone. Delta relevant. [5]Today [10]Past [15]Past" meaning the [5] minute delta was done the day of that crumb, and the [10] and [15] minute deltas was done before that crumb.
Timestamps and Delta Markers are used for comms from POTUS, through Q, and finally to anons, which can be viewed as a stopwatch or Clock (pic1).
Q later used a few other delta markers such as [0], [1] (pic2), [6], [7], [17], [30] (days), [1 year], and the countdown negative delta markers (pic3)
The Clock is for looking at deltas between Q and POTUS for comms.
Q then demonstrates how The Clock and delta markers can be used effectively for comms on 1/7/18 (pic2).
>Q 506 1/7/18
>Wind the CLOCK.
>The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.
This all summed up in pic2.
Q posts a misspelling/miswording of "win" but it should've been "when".
Q then posts this as markers, with the Delta Marker of [15].
POTUS, after Q's post of the [15] Delta Marker, posts two tweets with a 15 minute delta that have a misspelling of "consensual" in the first and about Michael Goodwin in the second.
Q then posts the [1] Delta Marker.
POTUS, after Q's post of the [1] Delta Marker, then posts two tweets again with a 1 minute delta that corrects the misspelling to "consequential", adding a Q, and reposts the part about Michael Goodwin.
Q later says "WE ARE TALKING DIRECTLY TO THIS BOARD. LEARN OUR COMMS" and (Delta) "Marker [1] confirmed. Confirmed: 15, 10, 5, 1", foreshadowing the [0] Delta Marker will be confirmed later, which it has been multiple times (pic3 and pic4).
Q explains this use of The Clock and Delta Markers in Q 506.
Q then clarifies the use of The Clock being for Delta Markers and deltas to decipher comms by saying "This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others."
'Winding The Clock with markers' refers to all the Delta Markers.
The Clock is a delta counter or a stopwatch to use when looking for deltas between Q and POTUS for comms.
The Graphic is a simple picture that shows the delta between Q and POTUS (epitomized in pic1, and shown left side of and throughout pic2, and pic3).
>Q 2647 1/5/19
>[1 year delta]
>The clock is ticking.
Q introduces the [1 year] Delta Marker for The Clock while referencing the metaphorical meaning of the signature 'the clock is ticking'.
In Q 2761, Q 2948, Q 3009, and Q 3141, Q acknowledges this theory of The Clock directly in a reply (pic4).
TLDR: The Clock is for checking the deltas using Delta Markers between Q and POTUS to see if there are comms associated with that delta from POTUS, through Q, and finally to anons.
Q has mentioned the word "clock" 31 times. Only five total times, shown above, were they actually in reference to The Clock, the other times seem to be metaphorical and unrelated to The Clock (all based on the numbering of qanon.pub):
>>6485737 (Delta Thread)
Pic 1: Simple representation of The Clock, used for deltas between Q and POTUS.
>>6485714 (Delta Thread)
Pic 2: Graphic of Q's posts on 1/7/18 that explain The Clock.
>>6485717 (Delta Thread)
Pic 3: A "Delta Map" with many (but not all) examples of confirmed delta markers.
>>6485729 (Delta Thread)
Pic 4: Compilation of crumbs where Q acknowledged The Clock directly in a reply.
>>6485733 (Delta Thread)
Theories on The Clock can be found in the Delta Thread:
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4854665.html
There is a tool on qanon.news for seeing deltas between Q and POTUS:
https://qanon.news/deltas.html
The fact is Q has yet to acknowledge your "theory", yet you push it as gospel and have been deriding anons who question you for months (almost a year now).
So carry on doing what you "do".