Yup. But he dropped two oblique Q references:
"What a great movie, huh?"
and
"He's a good ACTOR"
Yup. But he dropped two oblique Q references:
"What a great movie, huh?"
and
"He's a good ACTOR"
>Pacing and leading.
He's a MASTER at this.
Notice how he dropped the word "normal" too,
subtly seeding the "normie" meme.
"If you had a normal presidentโฆ"
As in, he's NOT.
Autists v. normies.
AUTIST pres + autists = winning
Disagree notable.
This is already at the top of the bread in War Room.
Activism and calls-to-digg categories are outside our defined Research charter.
When they arise in connection to other diss, that's sometimes okay,
but once we allow them in appropos of nothing
there's no place to draw the line.
But we encourage meme-makers and meme-disseminators to always keep up the fight, and to post calls-to-arms like this in-bread.
>Just doing my part.
at spamming?
If we wanted it in the dough every bread, we'd decide as a team of anons over a series of breads to do that.
Instead, you lobbied to get it in "globals" and it was roundly rejected, while you were told in no uncertain terms that you do not speak for us. So you just spam it at the top of bread anyway.
What do we call tone-deaf creeps that force themselves on a captive audience again and again, day after day, after they've been told 'no?'
Ask Joe Biden
>>5974244, >>5975034, >>5977415, >>5978252, >>5978925, >>5979673, >>5980464, >>5981205, >>5982017, >>5980464, >>5981205, >>5982017, >>5982722, >>5983519, >>5984280, >>5985057, >>5985870, >>5986631, >>5987384, >>5988322, >>5990073, >>5990792, >>5991569, >>5992275, >>5993254, >>5993849, >>5994682, >>5995442, >>5996235, >>5996999, >>5997789, >>5999465, >>6000113, >>6003417, >>6004019, >>6004788, >>6007861, >>6008652, >>6009449, >>6010219, >>6010748, >>6011134, >>6011765, >>6012580, >>6018026, >>6018786, >>6019606, >>6020389, >>6021184, >>6021957, >>6022737, >>6023671
>The more your rant against it [for no reason that I can tell] the more I'm going to be motivated to post it
The more you say no to my advances, they more I will force myself on you.
>Why not do a rant on actual shills
An enemy in plain clothes shills.
A traitor that says "I represent you!" while labeling you with a target ready-made by your enemy, is stabbing you in the back.
Ask anyone in the know which is more dangerous.
I yield to the sophistication of your argument