>>8425200 PB Notable

Haven't even seen any posts since this one in PB. Been digging ever since, and could use help continuing.

My initial dig on anyone in that photo, Franz Bornewasser, the Bishop of Trier, quickly led to a primary evidence source in the Nuremberg Trials, and it is so massive that I haven't gotten any further. I'm not sure the individuals in this photo are the point, but maybe the EVENT when the photo was taken– was it at the signing of the Concordat, the church's "deal with the devil"? Look at the expressions of resignation on the bishops' faces. Man, they know.

"Documents prepared by the American OSS, and used in evidence at the Nuremberg Trials, record that the Nazis were cautious with regard to the murder of church leaders, and conscious of not wanting to create martyrs. Nevertheless, Catholic leaders frequently faced violence or the threat of violence, particularly at the hands of the SA, the SS or Hitler Youth. A number of cases were cited by the OSS, including two attacks against Bishop Bornewasser of Trier.

HOLY COW LOOK AT THIS:

http://lawcollections.library.cornell.edu/nuremberg/catalog/nur:00773

"S R & A 3114.4 / The Nazi Master Plan / Annex 4: The Persecution of the Christian Churches / Office of Strategic Services / Research and Analysis Branch / Draft for the War Crimes Staff/ Approved by the Prosecution Review Board / CONFIDENTIAL"

(title page in pic related)

Please take a look at this document, anons. I can NOT recall us ever digging this over the last three-plus years, and this thing is WILD. I'd never even HEARD of the Donovan Nuremberg Trials Collection before today. Why it's at the Cornell Law Library instead of the Library of Congress or National Archives, I have no idea.

I'd like to read it in detail later. Am skimming now, but from secondary sources given elsewhere, a section of the "plan" guaranteed church religious freedom to the Catholic Church in exchange for political support.

This sauce is a good quick read for the basics:

https://www.facinghistory.org/holocaust-and-human-behavior/chapter-5/agreement-catholic-church

"Church leaders and clergy held a range of opinions about National Socialism. Some Catholic leaders welcomed Hitler’s call to “overcome the un-Germanic spirit” and feared that “atheistic communism” was more of a threat to the Catholic Church than the Nazis were. Others opposed the Nazis. According to historian Doris Bergen, “Many German Catholic clergy were initially suspicious of Nazism. They saw Nazi ideas as anti-Christian, especially the emphasis on race and blood and the obvious disrespect for human life . . . some priests had refused to administer the sacrament of communion to church members in Stormtrooper or SS uniforms." Some who opposed the Nazis also urged great caution; they were fearful of attacks on priests and nuns. That concern prompted officials of the Vatican to discuss with Hitler the possibility of an agreement: the Church would pledge to abstain from political activity in Germany in exchange for the Reich’s promise not to persecute the Catholic Church and its members…

… In July 1933, Hitler and Pope Pius XI signed a concordat, or treaty. Historian Fritz Stern explains:

On the face of it, the Vatican had scored a great triumph. No government under Weimar had been willing to sign such a concordat, which would recognize the principal rights of the church—rights that presumably would render it immune from the kind of persecution it had suffered [in the past]. By the terms of the concordat the church renounced all political activities and in turn the state guaranteed the right to free worship, to circulate pastoral epistles, to maintain Catholic schools and property. The Vatican had reason to be satisfied: Catholic rights had been put on a new basis and at the same time a regime had been strengthened that seemed to correspond to the Vatican’s sense that Mussolini and Hitler were indispensable bulwarks against Bolshevism.

Hitler had even more reason to be satisfied. The concordat was his first international agreement, and it vastly enhanced his respectability in Germany and abroad. A great moral authority had trusted his word. But did the Vatican . . . really believe that National Socialism would abide by the concordat, was there really much likelihood that the regime would leave untouched a rival organization with its own dogmas and with such sweeping power over education?"

Faster read, and pretty good: https://www.vanityfair.com/style/1999/10/pope-pius-xii-199910

>>8427106

(continued)

Turns out we DID dig on the Concordat/Reichskonkordat

https://qresear.ch/?q=Concordat

Q Research General #9821: No Benghazi For This President! Marines Going In!!!!!! Edition

P controls the Chair?

Reichskonkordat

The Reichskonkordat ("Concordat between the Holy See and the German Reich"[1]) is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State Eugenio Pacelli, who later became Pope Pius XII, on behalf of Pope Pius XI and Vice Chancellor Franz von Papen on behalf of President Paul von Hindenburg and the German government. It was ratified September 10, 1933 and it has been in force from that date onward. The treaty guarantees the rights of the Roman Catholic Church in Germany. When bishops take office Article 16 states they are required to take an oath of loyalty to the Governor or President of the German Reich established according to the constitution. The treaty also requires all clergy to abstain from working in and for political parties. Nazi breaches of the agreement began almost as soon as it had been signed and intensified afterwards leading to protest from the Church including in the 1937 Mit brennender Sorge encyclical of Pope Pius XI. The Nazis planned to eliminate the Church's influence by restricting its organizations to purely religious activities.[2]

The Reichskonkordat is the most controversial of several Concordats that the Vatican negotiated during the pontificate of Pius XI. It is frequently discussed in works that deal with the rise of Hitler in the early 1930s and the Holocaust. The Concordat has been described by some as giving moral legitimacy to the Nazi regime soon after Hitler had acquired quasi-dictatorial powers through the Enabling Act of 1933, an Act itself facilitated through the support of the Catholic Centre Party. The Holy See became the first legal partner to Hitler's regime.

It is still in force today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alois_Hudal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichskonkordat

About the Reichskonkordat

The Reichskonkordat was signed in Rome as the bells of St. Peter's rang out. Both sides saw themselves as the winners. And both sides were glad to be free of the independent, democratic Catholic Centre Party which had been dissolved during the negotiations. Now the German Catholics were being told it was their Christian duty to support Hitler.

Secret Supplement hints at Vatican plans

The Concordat includes the Secret Supplement. Naturally, this is omitted on Catholic sites because it shows that by 1933 the Vatican knew that Hitler was going to re-arm in defiance of the Treaty of Versailles, and the Church wanted to help him keep it secret. In fact, the Secret Supplement of the Austrian Concordat indicates that two years earlier the Vatican was already planning for this eventuality.

The reason is clear. Already in 1929, the year Pacelli was appointed Secretary of State, the Vatican had set up an ambitious programme to train missionaries for the USSR and when Hitler invaded Russia in 1941 these priests set off for the East. [10]

This helps to explain Pius' shabby treatment of the Poles. After the invasion of Poland by the Germans the Vatican broke the Polish Concordat by appointing a foreign bishop - a German, no less - over a part of Polish territory. In the minds of many this helped to legalise the German occupation. In fact, it has been argued that the Vatican supported the Nazis and viewed their planned conquest of Catholic Poland as collateral damage. This is because the German 1941 military campaign against Russia, if successful, would have opened up the prospect of the conversion of Russia to Catholicism. [11] Thus the Secret Supplement, which quietly provided for an illegal German re-armament, looks like a very shrewd piece of Vatican strategy.

(continued)

>>8427152

#6419637 at 2019-05-05 14:28:16 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #8209: 5:5 Edition

Bourbon anon here.

I'm convinced French royalty was forced to operate in the shadows after the French revolution.

Shortly after, napoleon returned and reestablished the church's existence in french society with the Concordat 1801.

Napoleon notoriously being backed by Rothschild and french bankers.

(And if P = Payseur, and payseur = french royalty, and payseur is rich enough to control other families as fronts…)

Napoleon went on to wage war against the holy see through the first quarter of the 19th century.

Napoleon went as far as to KIDNAP the pope.

If you read the writings of many of the most famous bankers in Paris during this time they were pushing the acceptance of Usury, a crime up until this point.

Theres a lot of metadata to organize. What banks were involved in the loan to the holy see?

Banque J. Hagerman

Banque Andr� & Cottier

Banque Fould-Oppenheim & Cie

Banque J. A. Blanc

Colin et Compagnie

Banque Gabriel Odier & Compagnie

Banque Wells & Compagnie

and of course: Banque Rothschild

This is a who's who of French nobility.

Baron titles abound.

These are AGENTS OF THE FRENCH CROWN.

The recent house to hold this crown was

HOUSE OF BOURBON which still sits in some european thrones

These modern Bourbon thrones connected closely to BUSH and other swamp monsters.

Monarchy of Spain

But that's the not the point of this dig update.

You can start from the loan to the vatican, you can start with the history and connections that evolve from that…

Or we can map out the vatican bank as it stands now and go backwards

see if they merge at some point.

Well…funny enough:

The current President of the Board of Superintendence of the Vatican Bank is:

Jean-Baptiste Douville de Franssu

Douville de Franssu being a long established French family of nobility.

Almonds activated.

JB just so happens to be the director of the board of the Banque Degroof Petercam SA.

The founder of this bank being Jacques Errera, whos wife is Marie Oppenheim.

Jacques father in law and funder/partner in his banking operations is JOSEPH OPPENHEIM

OF THE OPPENHEIM BANKING FAMILY.

So on one end we have the Banque Fould-Oppenheim & Cie participating in the loan to the Holy See in 1832

And known agents of the French crown, House of Bourbon.

And on the other end, the Vatican Bank is being RUN by a french nobleman who is HIGHLY placed in the SAME OPPENHEIM BANKING FAMILY.

So that's the most recent dig into the vatican bank.

Add this to the previously discovered connections between THE BUSH FAMILY and House of Bourbon in Spain.

You start to see a long established centralization of money and wealth that's asserting itself over our most trusted institutions.

The church, monetary control, government…

The dig goes on. Help digging into those other french banks and their connections would be supremely helpful.

>>8427166

This is reminding me that the Rothschild name is very publicly related to wine and champagne production in France and multiple chateaus owned by the family.

>>8427191

I think they killed that data-mapping site (can't recall the name at the moment, ugh) which used Flash video. It was great and I haven't seen a replacement which compares.

>>8427136

IT IS ABSOLUTELY HABBENING

ROYALS GOING DOWN

>>8427263

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz base of operations

Remember, she appointed her dirty sheriff to head up all security operations at both the Hollywood airport AND Port Canaveral!

WTF had they been doing at Port Canaveral?

Shipping people, drugs, weapons, anything they'd sold

No one there to check shipping containers

Their buddy Epstein was a close recon point and close by in the Virgin Islands

Remember Epstein's "office" was right smack at the foot of the cruiseship pier there, and his private island was next door.

>>8427325

ACK

got excited and screwed up

PORT EVERGLADES, not Canaveral

I suck and will take a lap

>>8427374

Shit, and even George Webb has been bird-dogging Broward County and how DWS and Biden have been coordinating contraband smuggling out of Port Canaveral and communicating via encrypted BlackBerries? (arms to the Middle East? How about our military hardware that Clinton, Bush and Obama had mothballed? New classified stuff that they sold anyway?) Their Muslim Brotherhood pals were no doubt the buyers– loaded with cash and craving American military muscle.

>>8427416

Look through the latest Hillary email vault drop, #40

90% of the justifications for redactions consist of two words: "NATIONAL SECURITY"

#6210113 at 2019-04-17 16:01:55 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #7941: No More Cuban Footsie Edition

So my current theory is that Notre Dame fire was set intentionally by (((them)))

It probably serves as a fitting last resort distraction,

but also most likely destroys evidence of misdeed, and probably a hefty insurance payout.

The believed event to be distracted from is the release of the unredacted mueller report.

We here probably can guess that that report will show a pivot from investigating Trump to investigating Clintons ('crime against children' - Mueller memo)

Why Notre Dame though?

What is the importance of Notre Dame?

There's a lot to the history of the cathedral, however I will speak to what I'm finding to be the most relevant here:

Cathedral = greek origins for the word 'Chair'

"The chair serves the master"

Q also stated P = C and we confirmed that P = Payseur. So considering the above:

Payseur = Chair, or put in words: Payseur is the church, Payseur are the Church, Payseur controls the Church.

If C = Chair, and the chair serves the master, then we can expect that Payseur is the master.

Q also stated at one point "Rothschilds (cult leaders)(church)(P)"

So the heirarchy here seems to be Rothschilds are the cult leaders, the Church is the public face of the cult, and the master is the Payseur family.

So what does this have to do with Notre Dame?

Well, connecting french catholic history and the Payseur family we find the last ruler to be King Louis XVI who was executed during the french revolution.

During this time the commoners grew agitated with the Nobles and Clergy who existed as equal members of the Estates-General.

The Nobles and Clergy worked together to suppress the commoners. They also existed without taxation further burdening the commoners.

The rise of enlightenment ideals promoting reason as the basis for legitimacy found little praise in the Church.

The Church during the late 1700s became extremely wealthy owning much of French lands, and was perceived as abusive and corrupt by the commoners.

The stage was set for the awakening of the masses who overthrew their rulers and exiled the clergy along with establishing their own constitution.

The royals fled and it's believe US senator Lewis Cass is the son of Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVI

After the revolution, French bankers orchestrated the return and rise of Napoleon regarded as the restorer of order.

Napoleon quickly restored the place of the Church in France with the Concordat of 1801 and many Clergy returned from exile.

He was also coronated at Notre Dame

In return for supporting Napoleon, he gave the bankers a monopoly over French finances by giving them control of the Bank of France.

These bankers are most likely involved in the 1832 loan to the holy-see led by the Rothschild family.

These bankers are ALSO most likely involved in managing the exile of the royal family.

These bankers are ALSO probably the true power that controls the public face in the Rothschild family.

These bankers are most likely tied intimately to the Payseur family.

So I ask, who are these bankers?

Through these bankers, and the rothschild family, they took control of the Holy-See through their loans.

I believe at this moment in time, during the french revolution, the french royal family and the church were exiled from france by the people

Napoleon was engineered to retake power from the people and reestablish the church's power.

The royalty, however, probably realized they could not remain public so they went through great means to hide their influence using entire families as fronts for their wealth.

The whole point of this is to demonstrate the (((they))) were in control of ND and were probably forced by White Hats to cause a major distraction for the people within their sphere of influence.