Anonymous ID: 803143 April 5, 2020, 8:57 a.m. No.8693414   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3460 >>3474

>>8693314 (lb)

One day people will learn to treat trusted sources (to them) with the same level of skepticism as the MSM.

The idea is to observe, archive, research, and be ready.

Normie-verse is a shit show of jump to conclusions at every theory, rather than treat it with analytic observation.

Easier to view everything as fake until you can prove it isn't.

Less emotion, moar logic.

[[[They]]] want you feeling lost, sad, emotional, and black-pilled.

 

———-

Rather than reacting to some unknown random twatter faggot posting bullshit disinfo.

Look to somewhere that may have credible sauce.

For instance

Defense Visual Information Distribution Service

https://www.dvidshub.net/search/?filter%5Btype%5D=image&filter%5Bdate%5D=1w&view=grid&sort=publishdate

Anonymous ID: 803143 April 5, 2020, 9:10 a.m. No.8693503   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3752

>>8693438

>Does anyone have any sauce on recused children being brought to the tents and the hospital ship

No sauce has been observed.

Mostly random twatter faggots jumping to conclusions, and creating their own false reality as you suggest.

It has been pushed heavily which likely means either confused patriots or disinfo.

Severe cranium rectum insertion from twatter.

Poor faggots gonna wear themselves out over theories based on lies and disinfo.

Anonymous ID: 803143 April 5, 2020, 10:25 a.m. No.8693957   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4000 >>4032 >>4067 >>4084 >>4101

>>8693752

>>8693460

Not directed at any ONE anon general info:

When confronted with the unknown observe what evidence is presented

15 types of evidence

 

1. Analogical Evidence

 

While not a kind of evidence you’d use in court, this kind of evidence can be useful for

increasing credibility by drawing parallels when there isn’t enough information to prove

something in an investigation. Analogical evidence uses a comparison of things that are

similar to draw an analogy.

 

2. Anecdotal Evidence

 

Anecdotal evidence isn’t used in court, but can sometimes help in an investigation to get

a better picture of an issue. The biggest problem with this kind of evidence is that it is

often “cherry picked” to present only anecdotes that support a particular conclusion.

Consider it with skepticism, and in combination with other, more reliable, kinds of evidence.

 

3. Character Evidence

 

This is a testimony or document that is used to help prove that someone acted in a particular

way based on the person’s character. While this can’t be used to prove that a person’s behavior

at a certain time was consistent with his or her character, it can be used in some investigations

to prove intent, motive, or opportunity.

 

4. Circumstantial Evidence

 

Also known as indirect evidence, this type of evidence is used to infer something based on a series

of facts separate from the fact the argument is trying to prove. It requires a deduction of facts

from other facts that can be proven and, is not considered to be strong evidence.

 

5. Demonstrative Evidence

 

An object or document is considered to be demonstrative evidence when it directly demonstrates a fact.

It’s a common and reliable kind of evidence. Examples of this kind of evidence are photographs, video

and audio recordings, charts, etc.

 

6. Digital Evidence

 

Digital evidence can be any sort of digital file from an electronic source. This includes email,

text messages, instant messages, files and documents extracted from hard drives, electronic financial

transactions, audio files, video files. Digital evidence can be found on any server or device that

stores data, including some lesser-known sources such as home video game consoles, GPS sport watches

and internet-enabled devices used in home automation. Digital evidence is often found through internet

searches using open source intelligence (OSINT).

 

7. Direct Evidence

 

The most powerful type of evidence, direct evidence requires no inference. The evidence alone is the proof.

 

8. Documentary Evidence

 

Most commonly considered to be written forms of proof, such as letters or wills, documentary evidence can

also include other types of media, such as images, video or audio recordings, etc.

 

9. Exculpatory Evidence

 

This type of evidence can exonerate a defendant in a – usually criminal – case. Prosecutors and police are

required to disclose to the defendant any exculpatory evidence they find or risk having the case dismissed.

 

10. Forensic Evidence

 

Forensic Evidence is scientific evidence, such as DNA, trace evidence, fingerprints or ballistics reports,

and can provide proof to establish a person’s guilt or innocence. Forensic evidence is generally considered to

be strong and reliable evidence and alongside helping to convict criminals, its role in exonerating the innocent

has been well documented. The term “forensic” means “for the courts”.

 

11. Hearsay Evidence

 

Hearsay evidence consists of statements made by witnesses who are not present. Hearsay evidence is not admissible in court.

 

12. Physical Evidence

 

As would be expected, evidence that is in the form of a tangible object, such as a firearm, fingerprints, rope

purportedly used to strangle someone, or tire casts from a crime scene, is considered to be physical evidence.

Physical evidence is also known as “real” or “material” evidence. It can be presented in court as an exhibit

of a physical object, captured in still or moving images, described in text, audio or video or referred to in documents.

 

13. Prima Facie Evidence

 

Meaning “on its first appearance” this is evidence presented before a trial that is enough to prove something

until it is successfully disproved or rebutted at trial. This is also called “presumptive evidence”.

 

14. Statistical Evidence

 

Evidence that uses numbers (or statistics) to support a position is called statistical evidence. This type of

evidence is based on research or polls.

 

15. Testimonial Evidence

 

One of the most common forms of evidence, this is either spoken or written evidence given by a witness under oath.

It can be gathered in court, at a deposition or through an affidavit.

Anonymous ID: 803143 April 5, 2020, 10:39 a.m. No.8694041   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Self-Fulfilling Fakery: Feigning Mental Illness Is a Form of Self-Deception

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/faking-mental-illness/

 

Seems related

>>8694017

Anonymous ID: 803143 April 5, 2020, 10:42 a.m. No.8694059   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4104

>>8693963

>How can Q fail on such a simple thing?

It is the common modern usage.

>Is Q and all the people related to Q retarded?

No u

 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Occams-razor

 

ccam’s razor, also spelled Ockham’s razor, also called law of economy or law of parsimony, principle stated by the Scholastic philosopher William of Ockham (1285–1347/49) that pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate, “plurality should not be posited without necessity.” The principle gives precedence to simplicity: of two competing theories, the simpler explanation of an entity is to be preferred. The principle is also expressed as “Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity.”

 

The principle was, in fact, invoked before Ockham by Durandus of Saint-Pourçain, a French Dominican theologian and philosopher of dubious orthodoxy, who used it to explain that abstraction is the apprehension of some real entity, such as an Aristotelian cognitive species, an active intellect, or a disposition, all of which he spurned as unnecessary. Likewise, in science, Nicole d’Oresme, a 14th-century French physicist, invoked the law of economy, as did Galileo later, in defending the simplest hypothesis of the heavens. Other later scientists stated similar simplifying laws and principles.

 

Ockham, however, mentioned the principle so frequently and employed it so sharply that it was called “Occam’s razor” (also spelled Ockham’s razor). He used it, for instance, to dispense with relations, which he held to be nothing distinct from their foundation in things; with efficient causality, which he tended to view merely as regular succession; with motion, which is merely the reappearance of a thing in a different place; with psychological powers distinct for each mode of sense; and with the presence of ideas in the mind of the Creator, which are merely the creatures themselves.