Graphic on Possible Comms Regarding "the picture will be the signifier"
This Anon here was digging on a possible comm post:
>>8693934 (pb)
I haven't had a chance to evaluate the angle this anon took as I got caught up in the original post (I remember reading the book) and found some connections with POTUS tweets today.
I put these all in a graphic, and I tried to explain all of my reasoning. Hopefully this graphic makes sense. Sometimes I think well-intentioned anons get carried away finding connections, and pack them into graphics, but then I can't always tell which end is even up.
The post about the picture book seems interesting, and there are pointers to it being a comm, so I'm tossing it out there. I'm not sure.
Anyway, it seems it was first posted Friday, but was reposted on Saturday where there seems to be more info:
>>8676416 (pb) (that's the cap in the graphic)
>>8689565 (pb) (repost... more info and anon discussion here and in following two breads, it seems - look at ids and replies)