Anonymous ID: 7d558e May 9, 2020, 1:39 p.m. No.9098319   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8475

>>9094979

>>9095000

>>9095045

>>9095049

>>9095064

>>9095080

(from bread 11642-all LB posts)

 

"How to Fuck Up World Domination 101"

(A CoronaVirus Review)

 

Looking into the GPMB’s reports via https://apps.who.int/gpmb/thematic_report.html

 

There’s a report from Johns Hopkins: https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/thematic_papers/tr-6.pdf

 

The report is called “Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Preparedness for a High-Impact Respiratory Pathogen Pandemic” September 2019

 

This is the top of one page:

“KEY INFORMANTS The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security expresses its gratitude to the following key informants for generously sharing their time, reflections, and professional insights with the investigators. This report reflects the views of the core writing team and does not necessarily reflect the consensus views of its key informants.

• Jarbas Barbosa da Silva Jr., Pan American Health Organization

• Rick Bright, US Department of Health and Human Services

 

Yeah, THAT guy. Rick Bright

 

Looks like this ties him in with Fauci and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. A different piece I haven’t seen yet. FUCK YOUR VACCINE RICK.

 

“If the high-impact respiratory pathogen is not influenza, then the prospects around MCM development would be far more dire, as MCMs are likely to be much less far along in development—if in development at all. In the case that an existing vaccine candidate has been developed (eg, perhaps a coronavirus vaccine for an existing coronavirus could be used with some value for a novel coronavirus that causes high-impact respiratory outbreak), there is likely to be no surge manufacturing plan or capacity. If the pathogen is completely novel and there is no existing research base—what WHO refers to as a Disease X scenario—there is no alternative but to start with fundamental science and then advance MCMs through the development pipeline as quickly as possible.” Page 52 Johns Hopkins Report

 

“Perhaps”

 

“In the context of a high-impact respiratory pathogen, quarantine may be the least likely NPI to be effective in controlling the spread due to high transmissibility. To implement effective quarantine measures, it would need to be possible to accurately evaluate an individual’s exposure, which would be difficult to do for a respiratory pathogen because of the ease of widespread transmission from infected individuals. Quarantine measures will be least effective for pathogens that are highly transmissible, have short incubation periods, and spread through true airborne mechanisms, as opposed to droplets. As with travel restrictions, quarantine appears to delay the introduction of highly transmissible diseases but not prevent their spread entirely.” PAGE 57 Johns Hopkins Report

 

THEIR OWN WORDS. “In the context of a high-impact respiratory pathogen, quarantine may be the least likely NPI to be effective in controlling the spread due to high transmissibility.”

 

CRASHED THE ECONOMY AND KNOWINGLY INFLICTED HARM FOR YOUR OWN FINANCIAL BENEFIT.

Anonymous ID: 7d558e May 9, 2020, 1:49 p.m. No.9098475   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9098319

" In some cases, implementation of some NPIs, such as travel restrictions and quarantine, might be pursued for social or political purposes by political leaders, rather than pursued because of public health evidence." Page 73 of the Johns Hopskins Report

 

sauce-https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/thematic_papers/tr-6.pdf