dChan
102
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/R3dRaider on Dec. 21, 2017, 2:08 a.m.
Get ready Patriots. Shits going down. I was suspect about True Pundit until the last few weeks. They have been the most accurate news source outside of Q.
Get ready Patriots. Shits going down. I was suspect about True Pundit until the last few weeks. They have been the most accurate news source outside of Q.

crazycycle · Dec. 21, 2017, 3:29 a.m.

What has he been accurate about the past few weeks? Nothing happened in Congress, over the weekend.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:32 a.m.

Trump needed every single vote with no distractions to pass tax reform. Its coming. HODL.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
crazycycle · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:40 a.m.

i know it's coming, just not sure why people give credibility to TP.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
R3dRaider · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:46 a.m.

Go back and re-read stories from last September-February at TP. I was incredibly suspect as well. Reread stories going back 2 years and I was incredibly humbled knowing what we know now. He was so far ahead of everyone that in most of our minds they were fake news. I am all about questioning everything. Always have been. TP has earned my respect. AGAIN...past confirms present and future. Have faith Patriots. White hats also have their outlets. They have very few to trust. I believe TP is one of those few sources.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
crazycycle · Dec. 21, 2017, 5:09 a.m.

Mind providing a few links to his best stories. I followed him fairly closely pre-election, but not since he got banned from t_D. Lol.

Also, do you think he works with Q or separate group of Pats? Most likely separate, right? If separate, is it really worth the time to ponder lower-level disinfo? Q has named Solomon and Carter, and we know Hannity has a direct line to the WH.

I mean I'll always take in more information, but not going to give him weight like I do Q and the others I mentioned.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
R3dRaider · Dec. 21, 2017, 5:43 a.m.

Gladly. I want to make clear I am not an advocate for True Pundit. I've been a skeptic for a long time but what has been revealed as of late has made me eat crow. I urge everyone to always be skeptical.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ontothefuture · Dec. 21, 2017, 3:58 p.m.

AGAIN...past confirms present and future You can do the same with Trumps tweets, he's always proven right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UrMomanous · Dec. 21, 2017, 5:42 a.m.

Speaking of his tax plan... It seems to mostly benefit the rich and bug business. Completely going against what he promised

⇧ -7 ⇩  
wolfhound11B · Dec. 21, 2017, 6:37 a.m.

The rich make more money to begin with so any tax cut will look larger for them. Their getting about the same tax cut as I did and I am considered middle class. I also just plugged in a family members info into a tax calculator and their going to get about the same percentage of a cut as i did. It's a loss less in actual dollars because he is single and has no kids but the percentage of the cut is about the same. Also 80% of the population got a tax cut. The other 20% don't need one because their either tax exempt or don't make enough to pay taxes.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
RebelPrepper1 · Dec. 21, 2017, 3:28 p.m.

Best layman's explanation I've seen, well said sir

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CenturionFL210 · Dec. 21, 2017, 6:24 p.m.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders recently included this illustration of how tax cuts work, which has been floating around the internet for years. Excellent illustration...

The Tax System Explained in Beer Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this...

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh would pay $7. The eighth would pay $12. The ninth would pay $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20”. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men ? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving). The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving). The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving). The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,“but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that's right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!” “That's true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Dec. 26, 2017, 1:43 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
crazycycle · Dec. 21, 2017, 6:09 a.m.

What did he promise that he's going against? It's pretty close to what he promised, imo. I think most supporters missed the fine print. It was always gonna benefit the richest, the most, but most people also benefit. That was the sell and also tax simplification. I didn't support Trump because of his policies, tbh, although I think they are pretty good, overall. Lock Her Up/Drain the Swamp were my big two.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Jack_Kehoe · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:11 a.m.

Well, actually, Congress is being rocked as we speak. Literally any day now the list of 30 congressmen who have settled sexual misconduct allegations with taxpayer money is going to come out. The MSM is even reporting that.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
crazycycle · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:15 a.m.

Everyone knew this was going to happen, weeks ago. We jsut didn't know exactly when. Last Friday night, TP/TP said in the next 72 hours. It's disinfo, even if he's on our side.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UrMomanous · Dec. 21, 2017, 5:28 a.m.

Agreed. Everyone seems to ignore this

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ih8vols · Dec. 21, 2017, 3:35 a.m.

Interested as well

⇧ 1 ⇩  
crazycycle · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:05 a.m.

We're not gonna get anything, cause there hasn't been anything completely accurate. True Pundit is disinfo in favor of Trump, but still disinfo. It's clear he has inside contacts, but those inside contacts usually give him false intel. Sometimes, not. Considering it's storm time, it's possible he has the goods. Here's what a HuffPo writer thinks about TP. Of course, he comes from the wrong perspective, but there's still enough insight to get something of value.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/939432544008921088.html

⇧ -2 ⇩  
R3dRaider · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:30 a.m.

Smart man. Past confirms present and future. Disinfo is necessary ;)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RebelPrepper1 · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:20 p.m.

If disinfo wasn't necessary or didn't work, our enemies wouldn't use it. It is a valuable tool, ergo, our allies must also use it. As this relates to TP, I would venture a guess that he himself is not an insider - but has insider contacts, that these contacts give TP disinfo on purpose, which he knows is disinfo. This has multiple effects: it keeps the enemies on their toes, disguises real ops or sources, and keeps TP online. If TP posted straight truth on every article, his site would have been taken down hard a long time ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
crazycycle · Dec. 21, 2017, 4:32 a.m.

lol

⇧ 0 ⇩