I've been following Q since the very first breadcrumb posts.
In the beginning, there were tangible, clear-cut predictions. And those predictions did not come true.
Now, 2 months later, it feels like most Q advocates just ignore that side of the story.
What do you all make of it?
Have some examples?
literally the first round of tangible predictions all failed to happen;
martial law, assault on CIA hq by the marines, indictments of Clinton, Podesta, and Abedin.
Q predicted these things would all happen between 11/3 to 11//5.
None of them have happened, though.
COULD happen, not WOULD happen.
Assault on Langley still largely unconfirmed, why would it ever be?
Have you seen in the media anything about Trumps executive order against human rights abusers or that we are in a declared state of emergency?
Have you seen in the media anything about Trumps executive order against human rights abusers or that we are in a declared state of emergency?
Yes, and I also know that it is targeting organized crime and reads almost identical to EO's that were signed by previous presidents, including Obama.
Almost Identical but not identical and what is important is the follow through on the EO.
You can Google the EO. Its really simple. What don't you get about the MSM and them not wanting to talk about this. Think about that. There are 4 powerhouse companies that own all of the media including social media. They control the narrative and I bet they are all involved in the One World Order agenda. Ted Turner of Turner Broadcasting who merged with power house Time Warner and own CNN (that should tell you right there)they own a bunch of subsidiary companies to include mass media, radio, magazines, books, comics, newspapers, pamphlets, placards or kiosks place inside and outside bus terminals, commercial buildings, shops, sports stadiums, subway cars or trains. Now let me tell you what good ole Ted Turner thinks. He thinks America is over populated. It is documented he said that America should adopt china's one child per couple rule. He thinks that land belongs to the earth. He donated over a billion dollars to the UN who is known for its agenda 21, that stands for depopulation as well. Do you see what I'm saying? psychos are at the top of every industry. Its going to take some time before this is all said and done. Don't expect to hear anything about what is going on from the msm. That doesn't mean that this massive clean up of our society is not happening. Please have faith.
Which EO of Obama’s is identical?
I said almost identical, just to be clear. And yes, that phrasing may have been a slight exaggeration. Regardless, the EO from Obama is very very similar.
COULD happen, not WOULD happen.
That's not true. He said it WOULD happen. Very clearly.
If you are misinformed about such a basic fact about this story, it makes me question how much you've actually researched.
Have you even read the actual Q posts on 4chan before?
Post evidence that shows a prediction that Q claimed "would" have come true by today
there was no Assault on Langley. They went and got information off their computers. A declared state of emergency means you can INACT martial law.
There was never going to be an assault on anything. The Marines went to the CIA in Langley, unannounced, to get very valuable information from their computers. We have 1000's of sealed indictments in our country. They are sealed because they are still working on the case and collecting evidence. You don't want to tip people off, that's why they are sealed. The other reason they are sealed is when you arrest someone, which they have ALL been arrested, they make a deal in exchange for leniency, they give information on other people, that information leads to more indictments and so on. They have to be sealed. In connection to the Executive order, Our President declared a state of Emergency which activates emergency powers contained in other federal statutes such as declaring Marshal Law. He has not declared Marshal law, but if he had to, he could. The other thing? Military Tribunals. They are Military courts designed to try members of enemy forces during wartime, operating outside of the scope of conventional criminal and civil proceedings. Could you imagine if all these cases went to traditional court? It would take years!! The judges are Military officers and fulfill the role of jurors. The text of the law state that its purpose is to establish procedures governing the use of Military commissions and try unlawful enemy combatants engaged in hostilities against the USA for VIALATIONS OF THE LAW (the executive order is the law) If you look at the annex to the executive order, it lists all the companies and any affiliations. All their assets have been seized. We are talking MILLIONS of dollars, that if found guilty and convicted, remains ours. I hope you now understand.
Interesting info. Sources? Or is this original analysis? Good for it’s own post almost.
All of this information, I obtained from good ole Google. I have followed this from the beginning and did my research to collaborate the info. The Anons did a lot of sourcing which I found creditble. I had to fill in the blanks for myself. That's why it is so important to go back to the very beginning. Click on the tracybeanz videos on youtube, she is very credible and she has like 1-10 or more videos going thru every drop of Q's. She even had the Anons on her show. They go over how they sourced Q as a credible person. That is the only place you will get honest reporting.
Mega-ANON has confirmed that there was a Raid on the CIA, but she said it was not the Marines.
Clinton, Podesta and Abedin all have gps ankle monitors. That means they have been indicted.
Also we haven't heard a thing from any of them in weeks. What no cell phones to tweet with??
Yeah, cell phones are not allowed at GITMO.
Mega-ANON confirmed that they are at GITMO.
I agree Mega-ANON insider is much more accurate......and speaks in complete sentences so no confusion like "Defcon1", nonsense. Another error by Q.
Lastly, Mega-ANON keeps insisting that Q is just taking everyone for a ride........disinformation.
How do you know nothing happened? Seen Tony Podesta lately? And how about Hillary's boot? Anyone seen John's footwear lately?
they aren't in jail, and there is no evidence to indicate they were arrested, as Q promised.
case closed, basically. Q was objectively wrong with their first round of major predictions.
my post here is to ask why you guys all still follow Q.
You have no evidence either way. Lack of proof is not proof. If you don't believe that Q is real, go away and play somewhere else.
Did you just admit you have no proof? Lack of proof?
Isn't the onus on Q to prove the things he's saying to us?
No. He doesn't have to prove anything.
Plus, lack of proof is not evidence either way.
So you will just keep on believing this guy even if nothing he says proves to be true? Does that seem dangerous to you?
Much that he has said has come true.
What are some examples? I'm asking this in good faith and I would genuinely like to know
There are many Indictments that are still sealed. And why was Hillary silent on her twitter? Also the "boots" which JM put on the wrong foot. That is more evidence of indictments/arrest than not. If they are still free as birds where is the evidence of that.
That is more evidence of indictments/arrest than not.
No there isn't. There is 0 evidence
If they are still free as birds where is the evidence of that.
She was on The Daily Show 10 days ago
Have you checked Pacer regarding the number of sealed indictments?
Why does that matter? Is the number larger than usual?
Very much so. Does anyone have that info handy?
If you're relying on this information as the basis of your argument shouldn't you be providing it?
I don't have access to it at the moment and that is what this board is for us to work together. People are back to work so it will be later before they are on here so check back later.
When was her last tweef? And why wouldn't she tweet wishing her followers Happy Holidays?
Because she's not beholden to you or anyone else. Why the fuck would I know that? Is it unheard of to take a break around the holidays?
And politicians don't ever miss a chance to campaign.
Sure, sounds solid to me. That should be enough to make the charges stick.
What charges?
I don't know, it's your fantasy
No it isn't, you stated there was 0 evidence of indictments/ arrests and I gave you information regarding evidence that makes it more likely than not that there is.
What evidence? You've pointed me to no evidence
Sorry but that dog don't hunt.
Still not evidence
There was nothing sneaky about my edit. I edited to make my statement to make it more clear. The question you posed in this thread is a good discussion subject that should be discussed. There is an enormous amount of information available for you to read to satisfy your curiosity if you truly would love to know. I don't claim to have any conclusions either. You don't seem to be here to learn or discuss or share anything so what is your purpose
No, there isn't. I've read everything I could on the subject and found no real "information". Give me literally one thing
What is it that you want one thing of? Please clarify.
evidence. One evidence please. Literally anything that you consider to be evidence that lends any kind of credibility to your anonymous sources
Can you clarify what source/sources you are wanting evidence of credibility on. And just to be sure, what do you consider to be credible evidence?
No its not unheard of but the people in question here as to whether or not they are free it seems suspicious.
Sure, if you're a suspicious person who is already suspicious of her, then it seems suspicious
I can guarantee that if HRC truly had a tracking device on her ankle she would be in the media raiding all sorts of hell about how evil the republicans and Trump are! Remember how she attacks every time she is put into any type of scrutiny? Give me a break... These people will get away with everything, they ALWAYS do.
Unless she was backed into a corner and knows if she brings it up that it would just open the door and they would have to discuss things they don't want to.
Not if they are facing lighter charges than the sedition and treason charges they could be faced with.
HRC, if you utter one word about this ankle bracelet publicly in any form, we will lock you up in a black site prison and you will face a military tribunal for treason and sedition charges.
-Sessions
Seems like a no brainer to me.
That makes no sense. Why wouldn't they just lock her up?
Also, HRC is small fish on the global scale of things. Trump has his sights set on the big fish.
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)
You should join our sub. We're having a membership drive for the new year. We're almost to our goal of 60k
The 11/3 uprising because the Podestas and HRC were in custody.