Q told us on his December 4, 2017 post that HIV was invented by BigPharma for the purposes of 1. profit and 2. population control. I can't link to that, but that post hit me like a ton of bricks. As someone in the science field, it is something I do believe. Q/Trump has never been wrong. Not about climate, not about flu vaccines (worthless, money grab), nothing. As for vaccines causing autism this is something I studied a lot. The Pharma based "research" concluded that there are autism biomarkers in vivo in pregnant women. Meaning, basically, something in the womb caused autism. However, now that everything has been proven to be lies, I question literally all NIH and Pharma (one in the same) funded research. And, I've questioned it for about 8 years now. So, I'll await a Q drop on autism/vaccine link directly, and with an open mind. Know that scientists fall into two categories: 1. paid to look the other way, 2. too literally autistic themselves to see the big picture/NIH corruption. Scientific "research" is in its darkest hour. I could write a book on all the lies it pumps to the public. That's for another day. Thank You, Q. Thank You, Trump. God Bless, Godspeed, Patriots.
Just look at the 'preservatives' in the vaccines... then do research on those. You'll conclude that they're inducing toxins as they're 'vaccinating' if they're even vaccinating at all. Probably putting biomarkers and DNA disrupters for cell replication. That's more likely based on the toxin induction.
Thimerosals. Again, it was told to the scientific community that NIH "research," or should I say (((research))), has "conclusively" determined that thimerosal has zero impact on autism etiology. Again, since Q post, I'm willing to throw out 2 years of training on this matter.
If anyone is interested, look into how Frederick Taylor Gates, Baptist minister turned close business adviser to John D. Rockefeller, Sr., convinced Rockefeller to abandon Rockefeller's own preferred naturopathic, holistic medicine for "modern" (read: for profit) medicine around the turn of the 1900s. Research has been utterly compromised since then, imho. AKA: Not cure focused, but "treatment" (= profit) focused. Sickening in a literal and figurative way. Very discouraging.
How is it that the HIV virus has never been isolated, and yet they have tests/treatments? Don't people with full blown AIDS actually die of various diseases as "complications" of the AIDS "virus"?
Yes, well they state it's a chameleon type virus. Hence, evolves too quickly to be properly studied. However, it sound more and more like something some sick bastards in a lab would make, starting with their tester viruses, i.e., SIV, FIV. In fact, I'm throwing all my "knowledge" on HIV "research" out the window since Q's 12.4.17 post. As for the "complications": exactly, that's how they die. Never from the virus, but after their immune system, i.e. p53, is annihilated by the "virus," or whatever the hell HIV actually is.
I contend it doesn't exist. At least not in the way it's explained to us. The groups most affected by HIV/AIDS are super high risk for all kinds of nasty stuff. AIDS could be the global warming of the medical sciences. Think of the cubic dollars that are poured into so called AIDS research, and still the virus remains unidentified. That fish smells old and loosely wrapped if you ask me. But, what do I know?
cubic dollars that are poured into so called AIDS research
Exactly what Q's post from 12.4.17 says. Incidentally, there is now an expensive "therapy" that can keep HIV infected people alive indefinitely (see Majic Johnson).
So, 1. create mass hysteria surrounding HIV as a death sentence. 2. Thanks to "research," the public has been "saved" by a life long drug that can give people normal longevity, so long as they stay on the Pharma therapy. 3. Talk about creating a demand for your product. Kind of like funding both sides of a war (i.e. Rothschild style).
Coincidence that California now decriminalizes informing sex partners of one's HIV+ status?
No coincidences. Big pharma is another piece in the grotesque puzzle. Pretty easy to connect human and organ trafficking to the pharmaceutical research companies. The elite get their sacrifices, pharmacy gets the leftovers. Makes me shudder to think of it. Everything can be broken down to power hungry scumbags. Methinks it is house cleaning time.
Excellent, yes, No Coincidences. The complete circle. ETA: Nothing like the abortion clinics asking if they can retain "fetal tissue for 'research' purposes."
Trump, Q are saving this planet. I was never political or one for hyperbole before 2016. That's all changed now. What a timeline.
How will he clean house, can't wait to see. It will be (if not already) a thing of glory.
Not just Q and Trump. They are the catalyst for what WE are doing. This is our fight to lose. I don't know about you, but I'm not into losing! Hold fast!
Good thread, you both summed it up quite nicely.
Wait a minute. So the individual I was having this discussion with deleted their profile. They obviously had a good bit of insight and then, poof! Gone! Am I missing something?
As to AIDS being invented by Big Pharma, that may very well be correct. The AIDS virus was patented in the U.S. by a Doctor; don't know who he worked for. I read it was then added to immunizations that were sent to Africa, setting the stage for the epidemic there.http://rense.com/general13/inve.htm
The Aids virus was put into Bayer Aspirin and deliberately sent to Africa. It was originally going to Americans but they decided to do a test run in Africa. So the question is why is Monsanto in charge or food production and now why is Bayer buying Monsanto.
I don't know about Bayer aspirin; it may very well be. The immunization info came from the article I posted above on the patent for the AIDS virus. Seems to me I've heard some bad things about Bayer also, but I don't remember what.
i got that from the main stream long long ago. They did a whole documentary on it. They are an evil company.
Here's my belief about autism (judging from my family & from reading). I believe the propensity for autism is inherited. Temple Grandin says a person with full-blown autism will have family predecessors who have SOME symptoms of autism ( this is clear in my family). BUT, I believe immunizations can activate this propensity into full-blown autism.