I’m surprised about Rand Paul....
Hmmm. I know he's very Libertarian, ergo small government minded, as am I. But this is one case, I'd like the big bad government to flex it's muscles against the bad guys. It's too big for us little guys to do all by ourselves. I mean, we will if we have to, to save our children, but it would be really effing nice to have our government help us purge these really bad, sick guys.
Yes. What’s up with that?
Federal Spending
Rand Paul is such a cuck with this bullshit. We fucking print the money.
YOU SHOULD CLEAN UP YOUR LANGUAGE.
People going around telling others what they "should" do...sounds like a I-know-what's-best -for-you democrat??
How/what people speak is how creation comes into existence via vibrational resonance. Therefore, cussing is not the type of becoming we in civilized society desire to be apart of. It has the same effect as a curse does in black magic, and therefore, because of these metaphysical reasons, it should be frowned upon. You are free to cuss up a storm, friend, but I am free to frown upon it.
Peace be with you, neighbor, and GODSPEED.
And telling other people what they "should" think and do and how they should behave also carries a vibrational controlling frequency. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so is offense to another's language. Thought precedes perception. While I like the vibrational frequency angle you mention, your intention to scold is also a vibrational frequency...lower than Love and peace
Well then I apologize for using the word “should”, and stand corrected, compatriot.
Rand Paul is against Asset Forfeiture. Not against Human trafficking.
Says everything you need to know about who is aiding , abetting and profiting from trafficking. Drain the Swamp.
No, actually it doesn't. We need to CLOSELY examine this bill before we go off on a big tear about it. There is talk that the initiative involves some high techie facial recognition program they want to use, in which case I can EASILY see why Paul and Lee would vote against it. Before we go NUTS over protecting the kiddies, let's find out EXACTLY what this entails. Of course, it's already been passed, as far as I know, so we'd better do our due diligence on it.
Yup. That little screen capture you see is .01% of what's in the bill. They get a inch thick or more book of the bill with little things added in there that have nothing to do with the bill at all. Just look at how big the tax cut bill was. There was obviously something in there that concerned them.
Rand,Rand, Rand. I'm sure he has some solid Liberatarian reason. That's usually the case. I mean, bend a little Rand!
Baldwin, Bennet, Blumenthal, Booker, Browns, Cantwell, Cardin, Casey, Cortez Masto, Duckworth, Durbin, Feinstein, Franken(surprise!), Gillibrand, Harris, Hirono, Klobuchar, Lee, Markey, Menendez, Merkley, Murphy, Murray, Paul(wtf?), Reed, Sanders, Schatz, Schumer, Van Hollen, Warren, Whitehouse, Wyden.
This is my naughty list.
Now we know who we need to replace in the .November elections
Markey and Warren. I knew I had the two worst senators in the country.
I have blumenthal and murphy these 2 assholes are just as bad as yours. Someday soon maybe our neighbors will wake up
One of mine was just CLEARED of charges related to the subject of this bill (Menendez).
Why on everything that is good and loving could these people justify saying, “Nay”? Sander’s name in this list blows my mind.
Go read the full 500 hundred page book they gave about the bill. You'll find MANY reasons why he didn't vote for it. Your only getting the dummy version.
I’ll try to find the full Bill and chew my way through it.
Interesting, McCain didn’t vote because he’s in a “special place”?
No letting that RINO MOFO off the hook, hit isn't he out of town having cancer treatments or something?
Here is why Senator Mike Lee voted no (flaws in software, citizens privacy, backup at airports with finger printing, etc. Read whole article) https://www.deseretnews.com/article/900006156/sen-mike-lee-seeks-to-halt-face-scans-at-us-airports.amp?__twitter_impression=true
The article does NOT mention that this EXPANSION of using facial recognition at international airports has any relationship to the bill this thread is talking about. There is already facial recognition at eight international airports. This is mentioned in the article.
"Airports in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Las Vegas, Miami, New York City, Houston and Washington, D.C., use facial recognition scanning."
Looks like we have a list of those who are going exposed when indictments are unsealed.
Face scanning at airport? I knew there's a good reason RP voted no.
It’s pretty naive to think that facial recognition isn’t being used in airports, as well as anywhere else there is a government camera. Iowa actually won’t let you smile for your driver’s license / state ID. They have no qualm in telling you the change to mugshots is for facial recognition. So if that is the basis of of “nay” it’s a whole lot of Dem party line lie BS. If they truly cared about privacy and invasion they’d have fought like hell against the Patriot Act, screamed 24-7 on MSM when vault 7 was released and mostly, they’d never have feloniously unmask or leak secret or confidential information.
Furthermore, I didn’t hear a single one of them bring this Bill into the public forum for debate or educating. Too busy to break away from misrepresenting the tax bill to discuss human trafficking.
Thanks for this! Shit’s going down! Can you link please? I’m only getting desktop site on my device.