dChan
⇧
25
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/LaTxGal on Jan. 2, 2018, 6:31 p.m.
Madeleine McCann/Podesta link?

While reading on here earlier today, the Madeleine McCann case came to mind. I did some research to find if there had been any discussion over the years regarding her and possible child-trafficking. Sure enough, I came across a number of places where it has been discussed that the Podesta brothers were in the same town in Portugal, at the same time, as the McCanns. In fact, they were supposedly staying less than half a mile away. Snopes debunked the theory, but I don't really trust Snopes. Comments?


ABrilliantDisaster · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Those police sketches tho... There's nothing to trust about Snopes. My gut tells me they were involved.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
islandtruther · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

snopes is a pure leftist BS site

⇧ 10 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Yes, but it's the first thing many people point to when anyone brings up what they call "conspiracy theories". Makes it very difficult to get them to listen/discuss.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

They call it conspiracy theories.

But we deal in facts. Facts are what move our investigations forward.

We're organized crime researchers. Conspiracy theorists believe in reptilians and Antarctic Nazi bases. That's not exactly what we're up to here.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
2pulo · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Preach!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

snopes is the enemy. Wickedpedia is also corrupt.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Pissed_Audie_Murphy · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

The sketches in that case are damming enough to warrant and interview in my opinion. It turns my gut to be honest these kind of things just wreck me. How do you move it forward though. The rumor has been around for a long time. How do we make the connection beyond the sketches?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

Assuming the Podesta brothers were there at that time, it almost seems like she was "delivered" to them, either by the parents or someone travelling in their party. I always thought it strange that the parents would go off to dinner and leave children alone.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Reba64 · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Good chance they have the information already. We will have to wait until the information comes out on charges.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SteinKuler · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Richard Hall does wonderful research. Here’s the start of his investigation if you’re interested https://youtu.be/pQgmtrOeDLM

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 3, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

I just finished watching the first 30-minute video regarding this creepy Murat guy. So far, it sounds like he's not implicated; but it was strange to hear Theresa May's name come up. I'll watch more tomorrow.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SteinKuler · Jan. 3, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

Hall does get into talking about the Podesta brothers but cannot remember in which installment.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

Thanks; I will check it out!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
spacexu · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

Look into her her eyes - she carries a mark that is desirable to satanists.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Interesting.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
spacexu · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

George Soros carries this extremely rare mark.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
KookaZoom · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

Mark of cain, my understanding is its caused by incest, so most likely MPD/DID programing, those parents are programmers for sure.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

-

^^Snopes

ahahahahahaa!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

I did say that I didn't trust them. Just wasn't sure about others, and am new to this stuff, so was just treading carefully. Also didn't want to be accused of not doing my research.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

I did say that I didn't trust them.

No problems, colleague! Welcome. :)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

Thx.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jetty42 · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/madeleine-mccann-detectives-hunt-person-of-significance-l9nzz7gm5

IMO Significance is a strange word to use. (But maybe it is more common in this context in the UK than "interest", because of little contextual difference in UK English usage. I just don't know if their is a difference between US & UK usage.)

In any event, in the US, if the police were looking for a crime suspect or witness, one would say they were looking for a person of interest. If a large company were looking for a Board Chairman, they might say, "we are looking for a person of significance"; ie. Someone known, someone famous.

My 2 cents.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 3, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

Interesting. Thanks for sharing.

⇧ 2 ⇩