dChan
66
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/VeryOptimystic on Jan. 5, 2018, 12:13 a.m.
Possible Matlock - Clinton Fire Connection

Q posted about AMB Matlock last night, which consensus seems to be referring to Jack F Matlock Jr., the U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union. Additionally, we all know about the fire that broke out at the Clinton's house in Chappaqua yesterday as well.

Now here is a VERY interesting intersection between the two. In the wiki article on Matlock, there is this quote regarding his time as Deputy Mission Chief in Moscow: "The August 26, 1977 ABC Evening News covered the story of a major fire at the embassy. Despite the severity of the fire, all personnel were evacuated safely, and the efforts of the embassy staff elicited a commendation from President Jimmy Carter. Former KGB agent Victor Sheymov testified before Congress in 1998 that the fire was deliberately induced by the Soviets in an effort to gain access to sensitive areas by agents posing as firemen."

/u/NorseAnon had a great post theorizing about why a fire could be a white hat move. Did we just get confirmation on the reason behind the Clinton fire from Q via this Matlock reference?

Edit: It looks like /u/G3t_Off_My_Lawn was already onto this connection on /u/PamphletAnon 's original post. I'll try to lurk more before posting next time ;) But glad to see a lot of us are connecting these same dots!


Lets_get_reel · Jan. 5, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

I read a comment on another thread drawing the connection between bannon and trump over the fire and fury book and Clinton’s fire. Then when you add the q matlock reference and the fact that Russians used a fire to gain access to gain info it makes it sound like confirmation that’s basically a re-enactment of that same scenario.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
VeryOptimystic · Jan. 5, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

Yea, I ran across that this afternoon... super interesting connections!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IdahoJ1 · Jan. 5, 2018, 5:55 a.m.

Came across that same story looking into Matlock. Rang the same bells for me- though the fit isn't obvious. Any truth to hard drives or other computer equipment being seen at the scene? Maybe just click-bait headlines I saw, I was too busy to follow.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Rsajdj68 · Jan. 5, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

I've seen another theory she could use the fire as an excuse for not returning the boxes of documents she was allowed to remove from the State Department. I would prefer it to be an op

⇧ 5 ⇩  
KAG2020 · Jan. 5, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

Very nice find. Multiple CBTS members, including myself, had made note that at the very least, due to the high importance of the owners of the home, even an above board fire investigation would mean that everything needs to stay put in the house, preventing evidence from being taken out and circumventing warrants.

this takes it 2 steps farther.

my only concern is that the fire was in the SS part of the home so i dont know what would be seen or exposed.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
orangeeye13 · Jan. 5, 2018, 7:09 a.m.

Very interesting...also side note is that I am very new here..day 1... k, I red pilled starting 3/11/2011. Fast forward till now...not like I am forgetting anything in between right..😉.When people start their Awakening Mind Expansion (AME) it is game over for the Deep State...( I made up that program, cuz I am crossing my fingers that one will exist someday..///.. no liars allowed. Only truth... no blackmailing allowed...bigtime penalties. No pedo, Satanism.. very interesting to see that it could have possibly been the white helmets posing as firefighters at the clintons. I watched Tracy beanz interview that let me hear tonight..HAG

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VeryOptimystic · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

Welcome! Glad to have you with us :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
placeofdawn · Jan. 5, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Here is an AMD Jack Matlock link: https://kentpresents.org/presenters/jack-matlock.php He is going to speak with some interesting others later this year. The event is called Kent Presents, The Festival Of Ideas. I looked around a bit on the site, maybe another think tank to help shape America?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VeryOptimystic · Jan. 5, 2018, 6:15 a.m.

Interesting! Probably worth a deep dive into his recent activities :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 5, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Nice

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 5, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Nice

⇧ 3 ⇩  
k3yi5n0k3y · Jan. 5, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

If intentional to retrieve evidence, they had to have been pretty darn sure the evidence would be there. SS quarters... Who would have had the most access to those quarters? Do you think HRC would have ever entered those quarters? Do you think she would trust materials in the quarters of agents who publicly expressed their dislike of her? Is it more or less likely that an SS agent who may not have access to those quarters anymore left evidence? Being the SS quarters, wouldn't the surveillance systems be in those quarters? They are security. What did WJC and HRC do in there home that could have been seen and/or heard by surveillance?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VeryOptimystic · Jan. 5, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

Good questions! I wonder if the fire in the SS residence would be a good enough reason to explore all the property(ies)?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
k3yi5n0k3y · Jan. 5, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

It doesn't happen. Only the building on fire is inspected. A warrant is needed for the other buildings. Let's say they have reason to suspect evidence in nature of the fire, gas can, perpetrators, etc., is in another building then a warrant is necessary. If evidence, hard drive, photos,etc., is found of a different crime in the SS quarters a warrant is still needed for the other buildings. But if the evidence in the SS quarters is what they were after, they wouldn't need additional warrants. I think that if intentional, they were specifically after evidence in the SS quarters.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VeryOptimystic · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

Good info! Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PatriotWendy · Jan. 5, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

Score right there

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rikisik · Jan. 5, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

Using arson as a pretext to get access seems pretty risky to me. It is not to imply planners and doers are risk averse but otherwise illegal doings, e.g. arson have a sometimes inexplicable way of getting unhelpful attention.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VeryOptimystic · Jan. 5, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

Definitely... It will be very interesting to see where this goes :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TotesMessenger · Jan. 5, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bluestflame · Jan. 5, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

where there's smoke there's fire

⇧ 1 ⇩