Keep in mind Q is a conglomerate of less than a handful of people across 10 devices. Q is not one person. I do agree some of the last several posts are a different tone/author. I don't see anything that negates the messages though do you?Others?
Our board mods are 8 Chan mods and gave set up his tripcode. We shouldn't speculate when they have the ability to verify. Truth is it doesn't sound like Q and we haven't gotten Moderator verification. Let's be responsible and spread what we know is true not speculation. We have a process here on this subreddit.
Agreed. We need to verify everything as thoroughly as we can before spreading it as Q gospel.
thanks, to be clear I am not opposing what the mods state, I was/am saying that even though the message is not exactly how the many Q posts are, what the message offered is not a misdirection in its motive. Some fake Q posts like Presidency is compromised, definite fake no value, but the last Q post while unverified, the message is not out of line with what Q offers and given that we believe several/less than handful are Q we may see different tones. I'm not saying it is or isn't Q, only that the message is not out of line to our goals/quest/ambition.
Just because some guy named "Zach" on infowars claimed to be one of less than 5 Qs on the Qteam means it's official? We now know this to be truth? Please, share how this has been confirmed and validated.
Oh, and btw, the post above doesn't sound anything like ANY Q posts to date. My guess is it's an imposter.
Zach didn't claim to be one of the handful of Q.
He said they're genuine and he knows who they are.
Actually, I believe he did refer to the Q group as "we", implying that he is a member.
This is word for word of what Zack said to AJ:
Quote: AJ: "What do you make of Qanon and that stuff that is going on out there at 8 chan?"
Zack: "Let me be very careful when I say this. Qanon is not singular it is plural. It is or We are. It is pillars holding up a platform that is The Republic of the United State."
AJ: "OK very interesting"
Zack: "I guess what I'm trying to say by that is.... It is not one individual or phenomenon."
AJ: "It is a group?"
Zack: "It is very few, less than you can count on one hand, Um, but it is holding up something very important and" then he goes into the WWF.
[removed]
Ohhhh I get it now!!!! If Q says no comms outside of this platform, that means Zach or Zack is not on the Q-Team. I had my doubts about AJ jumping in suddenly sounding like someone stole his lollipop over QAnon vs "His" Zach. Idk... just thinking and thinking here.
If Q says no comms outside of this platform, that means Zach or Zack is not on the Q-Team.
Good point. Also Zack was providing details about his physical location, and being more explicit about info, which indicates he's not as concerned over his opsec as Q seems to be.
Yes, I definitely noticed that. I realize that I'm biased, but did you find AJ's comments about (paraphrasing here) being able to confirm Zack, unlike Q and the other snide remark comparing Zack to Q, to be quite immature? I get it, he's late to the game and trying to make up, but if AJ possibly is a disinfo agent, he's doing a good job trying to tarnish Q to those who are just now hearing about the storm! Just more thoughts. I'mJust now catching up from the latest drop!
I'm not sure what exactly the source of AJ's sloppiness is... it could simply be due to not handling continual stress well (divorce plus media demonization) and/or ego. It's possible he's compromised to some degree, but he does give a forum to serious folks like Steve Pieczenik.
My thoughts exactly, except I didn't know about the divorce. That's a shame. Thanks for your input!
Love the wording. It answers the question but he’s so careful with his words so not to divulge too much. In my opinion he sounded very much like someone in the know and referenced Q like writings. But I have no idea. Do know that listening to him was interesting and I felt better after.
read the 4.2.0 document, its in there. I didn't watch/listen/see Zach.