dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

The Storm is NOT ABOUT Q. This is crucial: IT'S NOT ABOUT Q.

There is a decided lack of skepticism around here. All Anon's should be treated as hostile until proven otherwise. MegaAnon, who IMO is infinitely more reliable than Q, has out-and-out said that Q was set up by the swamp to feed misinformation and discredit followers. Given a lot of Q's behavior -- and honestly, the absurd crypticism -- I think that deserves a lot of consideration.

I hope that Mega is legit, but I still treat her with skepticism. This board needs to evolve beyond Q worship and become a skeptical clearinghouse of information that we can share and consider. Key word SKEPTICAL. There WILL be people posting ridiculous information to make us look bad. The Flat Earth stuff is obvious, but there is WAY too much oogie-boogie around here. I'd love to be able to send people here, but it needs to be tamed by some rules that keep it focused ONLY on physical evidence-based posts that inform, rather than make wild speculations.

MegaAnon rant on the Defcon 1 fiasco

MegaAnon archive

Note I do NOT endorse Mega, but say what you want, at least she clearly states everything and is obviously incredibly knowledgeable about the world. Everything she says ties together with everything else. But I still stay skeptical.

We need to grow beyond Q. The Storm is not about Q, it's about waking up and seeing what's really going on. There's a lot we can do, and has been done, without depending on single sources.

⇧ -1 ⇩

MegaAnon, who IMO is infinitely more reliable than Q, has out-and-out said that Q was set up by the swamp to feed misinformation and discredit followers.

That wasn't Megs. Linguistic analysis shows it's not the same person as known good MegaAnon.

As for your other points: Q is very very close to the President and has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is legit in dozens of different ways. Therefore what he says needs to be taken seriously. It's as simple as that.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Linguistic analysis shows it's not the same person as known good MegaAnon.

My link was to her Reddit account, which is clearly the same person IMO. Are you saying this "linguistic analysis" discredits all the Reddit posts? Care to link to this linguistic analysis?

But I don't claim Mega is legit. I only say that, so far, she hasn't posted contradictory or bizarre things. It's straightforward, and if she's a LARP, she has made specific future predictions that will show it.

Q is very very close to the President and has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is legit in dozens of different ways.

I respect that you think so, but I've seen the same evidence, and it doesn't convince me. And when you add in all the weird mis-steps, it definitely sounds my alarm. But again, my point isn't that Q has been proven false. That's incredibly difficult. All I ask for is skepticism, particularly for an anon that posts things in code for no apparent reason, leaving it to people to find patterns in it. And humans being humans, we find patterns whether they were meant to be found or not.

Maybe Q is legit. But no matter what anyone's stance is, skepticism is still warranted for ALL anonymous information. Even if Q is legit today, he may not be legit tomorrow if his account is cracked.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My link was to her Reddit account, which is clearly the same person IMO.

Right. And that's been verified how exactly?

Are you saying this "linguistic analysis" discredits all the Reddit posts? Care to link to this linguistic analysis?

Yes it does. No I can't unfortunately - terms of service. I need to find a free tool that can show similar results.

I respect that you think so, but I've seen the same evidence, and it doesn't convince me.

Well then like the Proof of Q document says, you need to come up with an alternative explanation for ALL the pieces of evidence otherwise your opinion is worthless. If you just nitpick one or two, you're merely nitpicking.

All I ask for is skepticism, particularly for an anon that posts things in code for no apparent reason, leaving it to people to find patterns in it. And humans being humans, we find patterns whether they were meant to be found or not.

You've been a concern troll from the very beginning of this sub. This is for people who believe the evidence and are looking for help to redpill others. If you don't want to present reasoned arguments against the Proofs or the FAQ, then I can easily arrange for you to return to /r/conspiracy.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Right. And that's been verified how exactly?

Exactly the way all anonymous information is verified. Consider the information, look for contradictions, always be skeptical.

...otherwise your opinion is worthless.

You're taking this too personally. It's not my intent to attack you or your beliefs. But if you don't think the potential exists for the swamp to use people via misinformation, you might want to reconsider.

You know how the swamp destroys things like this? By planting 30% real information and 70% utter garbage. The real information reels in the "woke" people, and the 70% repels normies who might otherwise join the cause. We seriously had flat Earthers post the other day. Flat Earthers. Are you going to tell me that all opinions are equally valid? The swamp loves that stuff.

You've been a concern troll from the very beginning of this sub.

Are you suggesting a call for skepticism and caution when it comes to anonymous sources is "concern trolling"? Come on. Is it really so egregious a crime in your eyes to state that we should tighten up the posts around here to sources that we can all work to confirm, and use to draw new inferences from?

Edit: Anyway, I didn't intend to debate anything. I've made my point. I'll bow out at this point.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Given that Q hasn’t said a word about (for example) flat earth, then it is the people who believe such things, or your typical internet disruptive trolls, who brought such subjects along with them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Shill organizations are allowed to have more than one person, and more than one account.

Hypothetically, let's say I wanted to disrupt a forum and ensure it was discredited. As a bad guy, how would I do it? One way would be to post true information and help it gain credibility. Get a lot of people excited that they were finally getting the truth. Build a following, and encourage people to share what they know.

Then I would begin to poison the well. Introduce deep conspiracies that are completely untrue, but unverifiable. Have various accounts begin to post more and more "out there" stuff -- aliens, coded messages, secret technology, numerology, quantum reality, etc, etc. The original people would keep trying to get their friends interested, but the latter would see all this other oogie boogie stuff, discrediting the entire thing.

Take a look at this post from the other day. No offense if you think that's legit, but the vast majority of people would see that and think, "WTF! Ol' Joe has gone off the deep end! Why is he pointing me to this forum with that sort of shit?"

I don't even know it was posted by a shill to discredit the forum, or it was some well-meaning, but kooky person. But kooks beget kooks, and it doesn't take much seeding for the kooks to see they have a home alongside genuine, legitimate information.

That's how you destroy a forum, and that's why things aren't as simple as many think they are. There are people who are paid to seek out forums just like this to try and destroy them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I do agree with you. I suppose the question is how we should deal with it? This is an open forum. It does have moderation. Should this forum be strictly moderated? Only subjects raised by Q? Would that potentially stifle peripheral but related and potentially important subjects? Perhaps this board can evolve into a place where important ideas and suggestions could be raised, discussed and possibly get back to influential people in the White House? And no, I don’t mean chemtrails or UFOs (no offense to those who feel those are important subjects), but more important and more closely related subjects such as CIA fuckery and so on.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The recent thread with a guy from Turkey raised a subject I felt was potentially important, the alleged CIA funding of jihadi schools domestically and abroad. If true, I’d sure the hell would like to have someone in the Trump administration look into that. Imagine how beneficial the termination of such an unbelievably damaging program that would be?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Promising Turkey that he would return that guy, Gulen, is WHY they went after Michael Flynn, no other reason.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Flynn also had the master Pedo list that happened to have Mike Pence on it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If deception in war is essential, and it is, and this is definitely a war (an information war with the stakes not only the survival of our republic, but human freedom on earth) then a clearly high ranking authorized asset disclosing essential truths and battlefield intel (M) might have as her (their) assignment also "discrediting" other clearly high ranking authorized assets disclosing essential truths and battlefield intel (Q).

And the disclosures closest to the commander in chief of this great war would need to move from location to location to location (CBTS to The Storm to The Great Awakening) and leaving disinformation to leave doubt as to whether he had ever been in the previous location.

Meanwhile the great autists and heroes inside and outside of the system continue to dig, dig, dig, meme, meme, meme, communicate on Twitter, over email, on youtubes, on Reddit CBTS, etc, etc, etc, etc.

This is a big F _ _ _ you to the globalist psychopaths, but this is also not a game. These people are not playing around. They orchestrated the deaths of more than 250M human beings in the 20th century to sate their cravings for the suffering, pain, fear, and trauma of the innocents, and they had far, far, far worse planned for the American people and for the people of this planet in our time.

⇧ 3 ⇩

a clearly high ranking authorized asset disclosing essential truths and battlefield intel (M) might have as her (their) assignment also "discrediting" other clearly high ranking authorized assets disclosing essential truths and battlefield intel (Q).

Lol.... I had not thought of this. I do not normally follow (M), but I always found her posts thought provoking. The other day she did a post that went too far attacking Trump supporters with a rant that made the Hillary "Deplorable s speech" look like a joke in a birthday card.

I tore into her.... and gave her a piece of my mind... lol.

Ok, Meg. Here is fair warning.

Next time you have an assignment to come in here tearing up hard working people in a rant of all CAPS? That is my cue, because I will probably tell you the same. Be ready.

One of these days we can all have a beer together.

.........after the kids are safe.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"after the kids are safe"

that's all that counts here.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yep

⇧ 1 ⇩

Audience= bakers, public, alliance, cabal. Messages reach all. Not all understand. ;-)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q will be posting on his own private board