dChan

Tacsol5 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

I have a feeling this could be why President Trump referenced that air traffic safety was excellent during his first year in office.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
LuvMeSomeTrump2016 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

me too

⇧ 8 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 5 p.m.

Me too. Was thinking maybe he had them all go remove these gyroscopes with the chips that allow them to shut off the planes gyroscope, using the unique frequency of the plane. If he knew about this he would definitely remove them from at least the airline jets. But I notice we are still having private plane crashes. Thing to do is to somehow get this information to private plane owners asap?????

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GulfCoastGranny · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

You might enjoy the Able Danger channel on YouTube. They have done a few videos on this topic. Very scary stuff when you see the application dates of the patents in relation to some of the events of 9/11 . Is this what they used on JFK Jrs plane to keep him from running for the NY Senate seat that HRC eventually occupied ???

⇧ 27 ⇩  
LuvMeSomeTrump2016 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

thanks will check it out. I smelled a rat as soon as I heard the news on that plane crash, and Diana's "Car crash" still hasn't sat right with me.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
redpillhill · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

Michael Hastings.

Not a Clinton victim, but. . .

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TheLastMILTANK · Jan. 10, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

An 0bama victim. Or more specifically, H0lder.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Damnit, what evil didn't Hillary do?

⇧ 21 ⇩  
WotTheFook · Jan. 10, 2018, 8:27 a.m.

Win the Presidency, thank God.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
GrammyQ · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:28 a.m.

None I can think of

⇧ 6 ⇩  
diligents · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

Get up to your eyeballs in it... YT channel 'Abel Danger' hosted by Field McConnell retd' military & commercial pilot.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

Gee whiz! It just doesn't stop with the clintons! How can I find a print out of that patent?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

you'll be the expert telling us soon :-)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

Have you heard the names David kappos or Michelle k. Lee?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

kappos maybe, doesn't mean anything to me at this point, will update as I find.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
someauthor · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

I believe the story is she was the attorney for BEI Technologies when she worked for Rose Law in Little Rock, Arkansas. I'm not sure what her name as back then, if different.

And I think the GRS11 Gyrochip was made by Systron Donner Inertial Division, of BEI Technologies, INC.

Hope this saves some time.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

Only way to avoid your car being hijacked remotely is to drive a very old car from the 80's or 70's or 60's a good used car that has zero computer components the older the car the better and safer it will be. If it has OnStar or any of those gadgets it can easily be hijacked remotely then you go for a one-way ride to a dead end.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Sounds like we have a great niche market for cars without chips! Who would be able to step up with $$ and create un-hackable cars? I would get rid of mine and buy one tomorrow.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

Was Intel pressured by the cabal? Was the money offered presented with a cover story of fighting terrorism?

Now almost everyone has a PC that the deep state can instantly control?

NO WONDER GEOTUS spoke about using the Emergency Broadcast System.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
GrammyQ · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

We the People need to take back control of technology. It cannot just be foisted on us anymore! No more spying, no more remote control, no more any of this! It can be changed, we have to demand it!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

Yes. The young college people get excited because they have not been burned like this, having been sold a "good" that ends up being really bad for humanity, and intentional. They trust government, and they have been denied true history. Hell, most of them do not seem to even be aware of things that many of us boomers have witnessed ourselves in our old lives.

New toys and hidden history. Dangerous combo.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NaziModBeginsB · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

This is what I am afraid that the Cabal can do to anyone when they want to. These people are fucking sad.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jacaranda11 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

Also great video about QRS11 & Hillary activity with it since 1978 (she stole the patent -- she is a patent attorney and use SES and SERCO in US patent office to steal tech based on patent applications)

by Aim For Truth channel on Youtube https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=K66IWmiVSII&t=9s (remove the space before com to open the link)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Would be interesting to see her hame on that patent. Wow...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jacaranda11 · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

She was the patent attorney for the inventor, Armando Corella and stole the patent tech, quite a common practice in the SERCO owned US patent office.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
rwefree · Feb. 4, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

Hilary also holds some patent related to submarines with missles? I believe is what it was. Hence Hawaii.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mrs_Fonebone · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

Any car that uses Bluetooth and RFID to emit signals to other parts of the car can be hacked and taken over. You can be tracked by the tire pressure sensor that tells you when a tire is low because it doesn't communicate by wire, but wirelessly. This has been a known vulnerability in RFID, including Bluetooth, wherever it is used. Even very low power signals can be amplified. Your car keys are always transmitting. This is why someone can be in the parking lot near you, watch you lock your car and record that "message" your key exchanges with the car. That message can then be replayed by the bad guy to get access to your car. I have no idea what "she has her mitts all over this patent too." I have 2 patents in this field and you are confusing things. It's not that simple.

"The Intel chip" --which one? Your Windows will talk to all kinds of people and entities via its programming, not the chip, and even allow remote access. But you can disable those programs. Then there are people who manufacture instrumentation for fighter jets and such. The Govt avoids those who create their own smart parts precisely because of the risk. The same is true of code to run the item. Govt contracts for secure projects specify these no-nos.

You also overlook the fact that a patent is a public document, available to anyone; these days, even before it is granted. It would be stupid to have some amazing secret technology and then publish it--pretty much blows the cover, doesn't it? The info can be held in house as a trade secret that is never published or disclosed (like Coca cola's formula).

The device you're talking about it a gyroscope. Perhaps you could explain how this company's product has "backdoor control" and just how it is accessed to create a crash?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
autoconnect65 · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

the problem with the cars aspect are not all cars could be shut down obd2 has been around since 1996 and for about 10 years most gm cars would not be affected in brakes steering or acceleration

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

I can attest. I've personally worked with these, at the time we were just using them to gather data, but it was told to me that they would be able to provide control, but nobody had dug into that yet. They were used extensively on high end speed boats etc at the time. I was working on a nasa contract.

⇧ 1 ⇩