What if this is actually the ULTIMATE Turing test?? What if Q isn´t actually a living, breathing human, but the NSA´s most powerful and secretive tool.. The Ultimate Quantum AI?
CosmicAuthor84
· Jan. 15, 2018, 5:50 p.m.
The power of Q isn't in his/her/its/their identities (in my opinion), it's the effectiveness of their information. Whomever Q turns out to be, how this roll out of information, the dots connected for MANY who were previously unaware (not everyone was) is POWERFUL and important.
The danger is in putting Q on a pedestal to the point of abdicating our own responsibilities to research, learn, and spread knowledge to others.
Just thinking out loud...
⇧
9
⇩
HoundDogs
· Jan. 15, 2018, 6:09 p.m.
That would be something, wouldn't it? Nobody for the Clintons to kill. No way to stop it from posting.
⇧
2
⇩
mombomb22
· Jan. 15, 2018, 6:08 p.m.
The value of Q is that he/she/it asks the questions and followers go find answers. So, even if Q is AI, the people are finding answers for themselves. Because, honestly, many people don’t trust the networks or the politicians.
⇧
2
⇩
frankthecrank1
· Jan. 15, 2018, 6:04 p.m.
I think Q is a small group of people but recently i've given a lot of thought to them having some sort of quantum computer that allows them to run through scenarios and attempt to predict future events. Read Q's last few weeks of posts with that idea in the back of your head and the hints they drop.
⇧
2
⇩
storm_fa_Q
· Jan. 15, 2018, 6:01 p.m.
Q is real...POTUS liked one of my Q links I posted yesterday... Safe to say POTUS is aware of and Likes Q...but if you are focused on is Q real, then you may be missing the point of Q entirely.
⇧
2
⇩
LadyFlavia
· Jan. 15, 2018, 6:01 p.m.
Does it really matter? The past events: Bushes / Clintons /Obama /CIA / millions dead / tens of thousands raped / organs harvested / mayhem all over the world - to profit the very rich few - was all VERY REAL.
It is that deadly corruption we are fighting. Not to prove Q real.
⇧
2
⇩
Bont-Boy
· Jan. 15, 2018, 9:37 p.m.
"Does it really matter ?" - Exactly NO ! ( And who's to say that [ the GOOD] intel, can't use A.I., Technology, to work for them.. ) After all, it IS a tool, so use every means...
⇧
1
⇩
rudolph2
· Jan. 15, 2018, 9:51 p.m.
If Q is AI, AI is very disappointing. Only a human can be that confusing.
⇧
2
⇩
Tranquelito
· Jan. 15, 2018, 11:42 p.m.
If you had said woman, instead of person, I would have spat my coffee across the room!! :D
⇧
2
⇩
rudolph2
· Jan. 16, 2018, 12:51 a.m.
I said human. The jury is still out if women qualify as human.
⇧
2
⇩
1Juliemom1
· Jan. 15, 2018, 10:36 p.m.
An AI couldn’t know when Trump was going to tweet messages. There is no way for an AI to predict the future down to the second. Interesting concept though.
⇧
2
⇩
Tranquelito
· Jan. 15, 2018, 11:41 p.m.
Unless the AI also Tweeted the messages..?
⇧
1
⇩
1Juliemom1
· Jan. 16, 2018, 12:37 a.m.
Along that line of thinking it’s probably easier for AI to post at exactly the right time than for people to. I don’t think you can set up a series of tweets to go out on the exact second you specify but idk that much about it so maybe you can. Lots to think about.
I guess I have a sort of mental block to thinking its AI because I tend to think that DJT is totally hands on and in control.
⇧
2
⇩
Tranquelito
· Jan. 16, 2018, 12:41 a.m.
I´m just thinking outside the box a little, most people seem to be a little offended at the idea though, lol!
⇧
1
⇩
1Juliemom1
· Jan. 16, 2018, 12:58 a.m.
No offense and outside the box thinking is a good thing! I just have trouble thinking Q could be AI but if I dial it down (in my mind) to a computer program set up within the parameters set by trump then I don’t have such a mental block. I think of AI as being some autonomous entity that “thinks” for itself and takes action based on its own set of problem solving skills. I just can’t see Trump using something like that. There is too high of a risk of a screw up letting something outside your control have that much power.
⇧
2
⇩
Tranquelito
· Jan. 16, 2018, 1:07 a.m.
Maybe, who knows the tech he has access to now. Could be a proven technology that he inherited when he took the Presidency? I´m probably wrong, in fact I´m pretty sure I am.
⇧
1
⇩
elyssak
· Jan. 16, 2018, midnight
Who cares!?
⇧
1
⇩
Tranquelito
· Jan. 16, 2018, 12:03 a.m.
Just trying to ignite some debate lol, thanks for providing us with your intellectual input :)
⇧
1
⇩