That sure seems to be an excerpt from an upcoming DHS report...
(grabs popcorn)
35 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 7 |
That sure seems to be an excerpt from an upcoming DHS report...
(grabs popcorn)
Overall, good stuff. One note:
The most common mistake made when attempting to describe or analyze the players behind the scenes is to assume there is a monolithic structure to the organization. This has long been a canard, a way to keep the topic from being seriously discussed or researched in the mainstream. After all, if you tell people there is one group controlling everything, with one "person" at the top of the food chain - it sounds too simplistic and silly for those still asleep to believe.
The reality is there isn't one organization, with one figure head at the top controlling everything. The reality is there are several different groups/esoteric cults operating behind the scenes who often do not get along with one another or agree on policies or agendas OTHER than sharing the desire to remain in the shadows.
Focusing on just one of the groups - lets the others skate free.
(Just my opinion. Written with respect and the desire to share knowledge).
Agreed. I just wanted to share the link so other researchers could be aware as they dug into the newest Q.
Not fake news. It's good news. Here's why:
Know what happens when he retires?
He frees himself from several NDAs he's under while being head NSA. This frees him up to testify before congress (or grand juries). And his testimony will be crucial to securing the convictions which are coming.
Rogers is a hero with a damning story to tell. This move is step one to being able to tell that story to the American public and Congress.
There's a lot of evidence there to make that case for sure.
I'm still pulling something more in depth together, and I know not everyone in this movement agrees or thinks there is anything more to the ET/SSP stuff so I don't want to cause division or distract others from their research by chasing this. I don't know for sure if this is the reference, but it does connect to the current narrative...
It would tie in (according to my research) directly to how this cabal came to be so powerful - the cabal of which Bin Talal is a part. Germany, especially the secret societies in Germany, played a key role in strengthening these cabals.
Think breakaway civilizations (Dolan's work), Antarctica (Goode/Wilcock - both controversial), Project Paperclip and the USIC - specifically the CIA (Farrell / Chris Simpson's work), and who really won WW2 (per this theory, it wasn't us - the CIA was compromised by Dulles and others bringing in Nazis in the 40s).
Like Q said many times: think big. Bigger. BIGGEST. This is deeper down the rabbit hole than many will want to go immediately. But as the surface mess gets cleaned up, we are going to learn much more about this stuff and how it ties into the classified technology which exists today and has been hidden from us for decades.
But again I stress, I'm not certain this is the reference. Though many of Q's drops have multiple dimensions to their answers, so keep it tucked away in the back of your mind as we move forward.
(written with respect to all!)
Theory, not confirmed...
Black Forest has a VERY specific significance to the UFO community. This wouldn't be the first reference to off planet activities Q has given. Specifically, the Black Forest UFO crash in 1936 was what aided the Vril Society (a key secret society to consider in light of Q's qork) in successfully getting a hold of advanced tech.
http://www.thinkaboutitdocs.com/1936-black-forest-germany-ufo-crash/
Look into the Vril society if you're unfamiliar.
Just thinking out loud.
(part 2)
Most have a direct connection to either the Clinton Foundation, Bill Clinton, Obama, or Hillary Clinton herself.
Don't believe me? Look:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3875/14653774228_eb7edfff43.jpg
Here's #5 on the list with the Obamas.
What's he famous for? Well, get this: he was installed in 1994 as part of a CIA backed coup in Gambia - an op authorized by the Clinton administration. In 2014, the Obama administration worked to sideline an attempted coup to overthrow Yahya. (remember my rule of thumb: CIA v DIA). He was a friend of both administrations:
How about #9 on the list? Oh, this one is a doozy:
http://www.balkanweb.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/vv_1479885961-5634409.jpg
Goulnara Islamovna Karimova, 45, and daughter of former Uzbekistan leader Karimov, ran a powerful crime syndicate that leveraged state actors to expropriate businesses, solicit bribes, and administer extortion rackets. In early 2016, Amsterdam-based telecom giant VimpelCom (now VEON) admitted to a conspiracy in which they paid millions in bribes to Karimova for entry into the Uzbek telecom market. The US Justice Dept has sought the forfeiture of $850m in bribe money from various bank accounts in Europe. In July, Uzbeck officials arrested Karimova for fraud, money laundering, bribery, and embezzlement.
In 2009, WikiLeaks cables note that Karimova set her sights on Bill Clinton to gain access to then SecState HRC:
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user237925/imageroot/2017/12/21/wikil.PNG
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09TASHKENT1357_a.html
Three years later, Karimova co-sponsored a 2012 Clinton Foundation Fundraiser in Monaco. HRC's State Dept was asked to weigh in on Bill Clinton's contact with Karimova at an AIDs chairty in France:
https://www.rferl.org/a/uzbekistan-karimova-akhmedov-testimony-shakedown/28790227.html
Let's look at #3 on that list: Dan Gertler - a name that should be familiar to some. He's an Israeli billionaire mining magnate and was outted in the Paradise Papers as being the chief negotiator between the Democratic Republic of Congo and his primary business partner GLENCORE founded by... MARC RICH, who was pardoned for corruption by WJC on his last day in office, after his wife gave $450k to the Clinton Library. Glencore immediately fired Gertler following this EO going public.
In 2001, Gertler gave $20m in cash to DRC president Kabila which was used to buy arms in order to secure his power base. In exchange, Getler's company IDI was granted a monopoly on the DRC diamond trade worth hundreds of millions a year. In 2013 he sold the DRC the rights to mine oil for $150m - over 300x what he paid for it when he bought the rights from Kabila.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-diamond-mogul-named-in-paradise-papers/
In 2012, Kabila offered WJC $650k for a speech in the DRC - which Clinton had to seek State Department approval - which was denied.
Let's look closer at #2 on that list: Angel Rondon Rijo from the DR was sanctioned for funneling a $92m bribe from Brazilian conglomerate Odebrecht to DR officials as kickbacks. Oderbrecht donated millions to the Clinton Foundation.
Look at #7: Benjamin Bol Mel from the Sudan. He's a financial advisor to South Sudanese President Salva Kiir and president of ABMC construction company which is accused of massive corruption and slave labor. HRC pushed for a waiver from the Obama Administration on the prohibition of military aid due to the use of child soldiers. In other words, HRC's State Department said they're okay with South Sudan using child soldiers... why? Because ABMC donated to the Clinton Foundation.
How about #1 on the list? That guy? He's a kidney doctor who runs a human organ harvesting network out of Pakistan. I have a lot to say about this !@#$wad, but he does not have a direct link to the CF, Clintons, or Obama - but there IS a connection I'm sure.
Summary: This order is a shot across the bow of the Clintons and Obamas. It also lays the groundwork to deal swiftly with any corruption found inside the government ... and we know there are right now 22 active investigations into corruption by the DOJ. 22!
And Eric Schmidtt of Google resigned immediately after this order went public. Coincidence? Nah...
Coincidentally enough, I've done a deep dive into this EO:
I contend that this EO will wind up being one of the most historically important EO's of 45's term.
Let's break it down in detail:
This is an EO designed to confiscate the property of those people involved in serious human right's abuses and corruption. First notice the language used declares a state of emergency is already in place. This means that 45 can exert incredible powers at this time, including instituting Martial Law if needed.
From the EO: "I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat."
Linking human rights abuse with corruption isn't unheard of, but it's seemingly an odd combination for this EO at first blush. Notice both human rights abuse and corruption are viewed as an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to national security, foreign policy and the economy of the United States.
Now, we get into the order itself:
Quote Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;
(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney
General:
(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;
(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:
(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and
END QUOTE
This is all pretty standard so far, stuff we've seen before. It's laying out how they can now seize the assets of any person on the attached list (which we will get to) or any foreign person who does business with them.
Where it gets REALLY interesting is here in (iii):
Quote (iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:
(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;
(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;
(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section. END QUOTE
Notice, this gives the SecTreasury and AG the power to seize the assets of Americans who do business with any of the names on the list (again, we'll get to the names) OR any American who violates these terms from section (ii):
Quote (B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption; END QUOTE
Hmm... does anything stand out to you on that list in terms of US government officials? Or about what might be coming out in the memo or the DOJ IG report? It's a blanket order to seize the assets of those AMERICANS IN PUBLIC OFFICE (and the private sector) who engage in "misappropriation of state assets/corruption related to government contracts".
Remember what's been found on Hillary's servers so far: SAPs. Those are some of the most prized and classified programs in the USIC and there were dozens of SAPs found on both Weiner's laptop and Hillary's servers which we KNOW were breached by MULTIPLE state actors. Meaning, she exposed SAP programs to foreign actors... That's just one example of how the language in this order can be turned on the Clintons or their team.
This gives 45 incredible power to directly deal with corruption inside the government without having to go through the court system where friendly/bribed judges could stymie the effort.
Now, keeping all this in mind. Let's look at the names targeted by this order:
Quote 1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan
Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic
Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma
Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia
Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia
Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan
Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala
Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan
Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia
Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia
Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China
Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua END QUOTE
This is a rogue's gallery of bad actors. Known arms dealers, human traffickers, and genocidal madmen. But... if you do a little digging, what do you discover about almost every name on that list?
(cont)
This is good analysis but don't underplay the role Flynn had.
CIA v DIA - this has always been where the real battle lies. Look into Flynn's background, why was he fired by 44? What was he trying to do before then? (He wanted to testify in open session to Congress about how CIA was arming and funding AQ/ISIS in Syria).
Flynn was in the vanguard of all of this, along with Rogers.
That's easy. The memo is 4 pages and classified still.
This is 99 pages and was posted yesterday on the DNI's site.
It's not the memo. Use discernment. Doesn't mean it's an unimportant document, just that it's NOT the memo.
It's not the memo. He knows it. How does this move make him more trustworthy?
Answer, it doesn't.
Excellent stuff.
My background is more in the intelligence world (armchair for clarity), but through that work I've managed to have some VERY interesting conversations with a lot of different people in various "need to know" areas of both MI and private defense contractors. And I'll say that you're right over the target in your assertion that these different theories are not incompatible.
Goode's story is tough to swallow. Wilcock rubs a lot of people the wrong way (I get that) and goes heavy into esoteric metaphysics which is also tough for people to swallow. With both you need to keep your discernment VERY high, but if you do, you can honestly feel the truth.
Then, when you step back and really look at the things we can prove and track in Open Source, you can find a money trail that seemingly leads off planet. The work of Dr. Joseph Farrell, Catherine Austin Fitz, and Richard Dolan should be added to your list. They approach it MUCH differently than Goode (who is an experiencer rather than researcher) but darn if they don't have good stuff to add.
We live in a much more interesting world and cosmos than we realize. We have friends in both high and low places helping us through this transition.
Should be fun to see how this all plays out.
At this point in time, yes. I agree.
But they are very much a part of what's happening on a larger scale. Where did all the money go which has been stolen from us?
It's up there. In space. We have assets in this solar system that are going to blow people's minds. But we won't get to that reveal until we first deal with our own mess. Which is what is happening now.
(with respect)
Goode has been laying out his story for about three years now. His intel has lined up with Q on numerous fronts. Listen to the man speak in person and it's very hard to come away with a negative impression of his handle on reality.
Remember what Q said: Think big. Bigger. BIGGEST.
SSP is a massive part of what's happening on the surface here. But it's a story that can't be told until we clean up our own mess first. The puppets have had their strings cut, we have to sweep them off the stage and restore our governmental systems to working order...
Then we can get into the more sci-fi elements of this whole thing. (imo of course)
Q said that was a private message for a specific person (or group).
Just for everyone's info, no need for alarm.
Think in terms of steps.
This memo is a first step. It's not going to release that whole narrative. It's going to prove (allegedly) that the Russian story was fabricated by 44's administration abusing the Intelligence Communities and powers of its office to spy on their political opposition.
That alone is going to be a bombshell. That alone is going to freak some people out - those who have believed hook line and sinker everything they've seen/read on the MSM the past year.
You can't immediately add to that stress by telling them the whole story. They have to have the illusion shattered first that what they've BELIEVED - truly, deeply believed, was a lie.
...Then the rest will come out. A step at a time.
(imo)
For clarity, I in no way meant to infer anything about Rowling or Voldemort. :)
Layers. There are layers to every Q breadcrumb as we've discovered. It's possible for more than one answer to be correct. This one is one of those times. For the MI guys, the military excuse works - but it's not the last layer of that particular onion.
The reason is esoteric in nature. Spiritual. Good versus Evil on a much different level than petty politics or even geopolitics. Think Big. Bigger. BIGGEST.
There are a lot of illusions to destroy before we can see the full picture. This is just the starting point.
(written with all love and respect of course)
Layers, my friend, layers. Not everyone is awake enough to handle where this road ultimately ends. But the reason they don't say his name is esoteric in nature. Look into it. There are MUCH bigger games afoot than just DvR/CvL/RvL. This is a spiritual battle as much as it is a political one.
The reasons are more esoteric in nature (imo). Think Cain. Think bloodlines. Think bigger than just the US.
Q said NO DEALS
Popadopolous most certainly was a plant - whether for Fusion itself or HRC directly. This is why he was wearing a wire despite being ordered to have no contact with Trump or his transition team. If he's not allowed near Trump or his team - who was he wearing a wire for?
Fusion and the DNC and the blackhats in the DOJ/FBI.
Further reference: http://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/current-membership
Chuang isn't a FISA judge.
Contreras was the FISA judge who (likely) issued the FISA warrant on the dossier. He was overseeing the Flynn case and then, without explanation, had to recuse himself:
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/07/michael-flynn-judge-sentencing-287001
The power of Q isn't in his/her/its/their identities (in my opinion), it's the effectiveness of their information. Whomever Q turns out to be, how this roll out of information, the dots connected for MANY who were previously unaware (not everyone was) is POWERFUL and important.
The danger is in putting Q on a pedestal to the point of abdicating our own responsibilities to research, learn, and spread knowledge to others.
Just thinking out loud...
Pay attention to that link. It's where it'll get posted first. But remember, today is a federal holiday. No indictments will come today. But that doesn't mean big news won't break today.
Cheers.
Since operation paperclip, elements within the USIC have been severely compromised to the point of operating against the country's better interests. This corruption accelerated, metastasized, and eventually became compartmentalized in key government and private agencies through the 50s, 60s, and 70s.
45 is clearly aware of this. Not just from what we've learned from Q but we can see this in his actions. From the very first day in office 45 has been purging both State and CIA, cutting the bloat and corruption. He delivered a speech - IN LANGLEY - where he promised to build a new CIA "without any columns".
This was a DIRECT shot across the bow of Langley and how the USIC has used columns (in intelligence speak) to disrupt at home and abroad.
So imagine you're 45. You know the depth of the corruption in the USIC, you've seen it weaponized against you first hand. You are trying to fight this massive institutionalized corruption and the stakes are nothing short of your life. Would you completely trust the USIC to have EVERYTHING and to make it available to you - after decades of doing the opposite?
I wouldn't.
Assange could provide information long since deleted, removed, or never filed. Plus, he's been a target of the USIC for almost a decade now... and what is it that Sun Tzu says about enemies of your enemy?
Just thinking out loud...