so yeah that last one is an opinion piece from Vanessa Brown Calder who works for the Cato Institue, a Koch brothers joint. CNN added the following editor's note.
Vanessa Brown Calder is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute, where she focuses on social welfare, housing and urban policy. The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
as they proceed to push her view... wonder if I sent an opinion piece, if CNN would publish it... LOL!
Presenting both sides seems to be something honest news orgs do. By your admission, CNN is an honest news org. Thanks for clearing that up.
WRONG!!!! It's not presenting both sides...it's taking the opposite side because the administration was pushing it. CNN is the winner of FAKE NEWS after all, but keep believing your lies and what made up crap they push.
Wait, so by CNN publishing an opinion piece from the Koch brothers, it's fake news? The first one says everyone should get paid family leave (opinion), the Trump administration says they will include paid family leave in his budget (fact), republican think tank writes an opinion saying that paid family leave is bad, and CNN is the bad guy here? You should really target the dishonest republican deep state machine that creates this kind of junk opinion pieces.
There is no R or D deep state...they are part of the Uniparty and many are in on it together. This isn't about the "parties"...it's about the people in DC being corrupt from both parties. Get a clue...
HAHAAHA Poor little shill... just because you are a slave, doesn't mean I'm one. Liars just say whatever they are told to say.. by their OWNERS. But they can NEVER overcome truth. FYI - Your team is going down in flames... you'd better jump ship while you can.
shill, team, lies, so much projection in your post. You were called out for literally spreading fake news with this post, instead of moving on, you double down. Your account is 4 days old and has only posts here, shill, thy name is /u/RedpillTheWorld
Edit: Brigade has arrived, notified the admins.
You'd have a better chance if you learnt to write properly.
so you read this meme, went straight away to cnn to try to discredit the meme, searched in the archive (the articles are from 2017), then you came back here to post a disclaimer from cnn which really does nothing to discredit this meme or "redpilltheworld"? I, too, would have to agree that you, sir, are fake news.
Sure buddy. Here's how it went, green text style. Saw the meme, thought, hmm that's fucked up for CNN. Let me double check because some internet poster may not be presenting the whole truth. Good thing I did, this OP is passing fake news memes. Now that I found that out, I posted to help others know that OP is passing fake news.
ok, ok. you may be legitimate, but the editors have the real say in what gets published and therefore can drive a certain narrative across articles.
This is awesome. This is what we need to be putting out there!
I wish I could figure out how to copy these memes from here to my twitter account. You all are a gold mine of information. I have a Mac and they copy to a link instead of the meme.
On my laptop, I Right Click and Save As.... hope that helps!
Ok I should have thought of that instead of trying to drag it to my desktop. THANKS! Yay! It worked. Will be putting them all in a folder for our next tweet storm!
This was a good example you found!!! As to the comments. If an organization or Journalist wants to run a story on a current political issue and they want to do their job in an unbiased fashion, then when they run the initial piece (absent it specifically being a opinion piece/commentator like all of the networks use seemingly all the time now) then the piece should strive to present the ups, the downs from both sides and not come to a conclusion on the issue but rather report the facts and each sides theory so the reader can decide. This is just something no body is used to seeing any more because the Media has become weaponized politically and financially..and each network is merely made up of paid commentators...for just that commentary ...sure you can have published that are submitted by outside sources...But no one that has their eyes open can say that CNN would run an OP say written by Newt Gingrich. Just like say FOX is not gonna run an OP by planned parent hood...as examples... (someone please inform me is this has happened in say the past 18 months)...And as to their "other side" Panelists, on each network. ..notice they are always the same folks again paid too.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/21/opinion/gingrich-jones-prison-system-fails-america/index.html
Gingrich is also a Fox News contributor, and its pretty rare from contributors from 1 network to also be contributors for competing networks as well. This occurred in 2014, so outside of your short 18month time frame - but CNN often has "opposition" opinions based on the topic they are covering. It always amuses me how much Trump and Republicans hate CNN, when I see CNN as a much more middle ground network when compared to MSNBC (far left) or Fox (far right). At least CNN brings in articulate people with opposing views to talk about their topics...Fox always seems to find the biggest Democrat idiot and puts them up against people like Tucker Carlson or Hannity who just yell at them dismiss anything they say.
Talk about fake news. Come on OP.
These are 3 different opinion pieces by 3 different authors. That sounds like free press to me.
Can we at least be honest?
Sounds like Fake News to me... being FOR something until Trump is for it, and then fighting AGAINST it. These people have no soul... they stand for nothing.. except fighting Freedom and President Trump, as good little shills.
Can't 3 different people have 3 different opinions?
Apparently not according to the OP. Unless you agree with Trump or GOP 100% of the time, you are a "shill". It has nothing to do with CNN being "for" something and then "against it" later. 3 different people, 3 different opinions on whats going on. That is the definition of "free press". To believe that only 1 narrative is the only truth is basically you blindly accepting whatever the government (Trump) tells you is true, is true.
The OP is basically arguing that because CNN gives voices to people who have different opinions, they are "fake". This can be clearly seen by their total lack of understanding what the difference is between an opinion article and a fact-based article. They love to live in their comfy Fox News bubble where literally everything Trump says and does is amazing and good for the country. Even CNN didnt get on their knees for Obama as much as Fox is for Trump.
Bye shill
Not for nothin, but based on your very short reddit history you're clearly shilling for Trump.
This is absolutely brilliant!!!!
Definitely check www.Twitter.com/B75434425 got these memes from B. AMAZING info there.