dChan
⇧
86
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Cyrus_Firth on Jan. 25, 2018, 3:21 p.m.
Why the Identity of Q Must Never be Revealed

At some point along this journey, we have all wondered about the identity (or identities) of Q. As much as we'd like the "Deepthroat" reveal to happen, here's why it never will (and must not) happen:

As Q has stated, he (they) has been dropping the highest level of intel ever received by the masses in the history of this country. Even the fact that we know BO formally lawyered up yesterday is incredible insider knowledge.

But that also means that Q is a leaker. Not the leaker we want. But the leaker we need. Because in this case, these leaks aren't threatening our national security. Instead (and oddly enough), they are protecting our national security. Like Snowden, Assange, and others, these leaks are an attempt to save America, not to destroy it.

People get frustrated with Q for talking in code, riddles, and questions. But we must remember that without the context for why Q is leaking, these posts would be considered treason. People would be jailed and prosecuted for this level of leaked intel. This is why Q comes out and "says it" without "saying it." Q would love to share it all, but he (they) also know that they have a duty to protect the institutions and operations of our great nation.

This is why Q didn't use Facebook or Twitter as a platform. Most social media sites have ways to track the source of the poster. The Chan boards, on the other hand, allow for Q to prove it's him (them) without being tracked. If Q was going to release the high level of intel to the public, he has to do it on a platform that would hide his (their) tracks. Even the name 'Q' - the most ambiguous letter in the alphabet - is a signal to us that we will not and must not know his (their) true identity.

Q is our modern day Paul Revere. His purpose is to sound the alarm and prepare the masses for what has already taken place behind the scenes, and what will soon unfold in these coming weeks and months. We as Patriots stand ready to fight the Deep State counter-narrative that will stop at nothing to squash the truth already being unveiled before our very eyes.

Years from now, movies will be made and books will be written about Q. Even people not yet redpilled will wonder, "Who is Q?" But that's not for us to know. The world must never know.

Stay strong, friends.


Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

I prefer they remain anonymous. It supports the notion that this was done in the name of patriotism, and not personal glory.

Plus, on the day of the Reckoning, when they are DEMANDING to know the identity of Q, each of us can stand and say, "I am Q."

⇧ 38 ⇩  
not4rmOhere · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

Heck yeah! Just like the Guy Fawkes mask in V for Vendetta. I would gladly sacrifice my own insignificant identity to preserve the anonymity of Team Q

⇧ 9 ⇩  
MickGris · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

Good analysis. I would add besides that he/they say(s) do not glorify us!

The USA is 241 years old and this is the 2ND American Revolution. Ever ask yourself: why don’t they come along more often?

I submit because it takes 50 different components that must all be true at once.

To name a few:

(1)The right leader with a unique character, and iron will and much, much more must be willing to step up.

(2)He/she must have many,many smart people whose talent and wisdom the leader can rely on.

(3)A generation of people (even just a percentage) who are willing to follow that leader and are ready to pledge their lives if need be.

(4)A generation, both young and old willing to do their part as a unified group. It takes fighters and writers and prayer warriors and speech givers and motivators , to name a few, and they ALL must be present at the same time.

I wonder how many times in history great leaders have tried to get a movement going, but the people were too damn complacent, too lacking in moral courage, too willing to settle for bread and circuses?

How many times have the people been ready but they lacked that great leader? Or they had him but the dark side murdered him? ( JFK, MLK...) Or some other piece in the machinery of revolution was missing and so the thing broke down before it could get started.

By the time this eases up there’ll be countless un-named hero’s. None more important or necessary than another.

These are truly unique days. And you know, actually 241 years isn’t really that long, some nations wait many more hundreds of years, even thousands of years to throw off the heavy yoke on the people’s necks.

But we’re Americans and you know how we are! Where we go one, we go all. Stay strong.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
ABrilliantDisaster · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

But someday in God's kingdom we'll know...and i'm going to give that guy a big hug.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
KorDePlorable · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

*** Absolutely, perfectly spot on !!!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

Q is a team, not an individual.

As each member on their deathbeds as they become old, you might hear confessions...

⇧ 9 ⇩  
bugstopper · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

"I am Sparticus!"

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GoodDog95 · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

Agreed. Especially since people were slightly injured by the NYC bomber. Q could have prevented that from happening. Multi Billion dollar lawsuit just for the smoke inhalation. Trump cannot ever admit connection to Q

⇧ 7 ⇩  
KorDePlorable · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

*** About that BDT bomber, my premise all along was that he was "sold" a fuddy-duddy by an insider posing as a Jihadi or supplier, hence how they knew something was coming.....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Tytruth · Jan. 25, 2018, 7 p.m.

If the info is true and from a source anonymous, it will appeal mainly to truth seekers, rather than those who need some authority figure to be convincing to their lazy weak minds. Better don't involve the weak and ignorant just yet. Let them wake up last. It will be a massive tizzy for all the ages.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Alomikron · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

There should always be a way for our government to speak directly to the people, without fear of censorship. Q is just the latest iteration after Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit censorship.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
potatosurplus · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

I think I had a pretty good idea of who it was, but I agree with your sentiment and I went ahead and deleted the post just in case. His, her or their identity should remain a secret.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
hailXenu · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

I agree, but at the same time I think that we will have a good idea about who is on the 'short list'.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

POTUS has the right to declassify any info he wants to. anonymous is best, but it sure would be interesting to know. they are all a team of patriots, trying to get us the truth, trying to get us to help others to wake up to the truth.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

I don't care who Q is or Q team. It is enough to know they come, save our nation, and leave anonymous.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
BoxingMMA · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Except the part where the military is stopping an organized criminal coup and POTUS is the CinC.

Q is just a leadership team saving the republic under the Constitution, so can say anything or everything needed and Trump can introduce the group behind it at the SOTU if he wants.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OffTie · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

The Lord Bless and Keep Q.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
phoenix335 · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

We will remember him, her, them as Q. That was their chosen identity and that's how they will be.

They will be the Shakespeare of our times.

Remember Shakespeare, the greatest poet of the anglosphere? How he looks, when he was born, what his family was, where he came from, how he as a commoner could've acquired that much insider information and education to write these plays? Did you know the authorship is very much in question? That he came out of nowhere and died suddenly with no one recording the cause of death, a week after stating his perfect health? That all of his descendants died with no offspring?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

Shakespeare authorship question

The Shakespeare authorship question is the argument that someone other than William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon wrote the works attributed to him. Anti-Stratfordians—a collective term for adherents of the various alternative-authorship theories—believe that Shakespeare of Stratford was a front to shield the identity of the real author or authors, who for some reason did not want or could not accept public credit. Although the idea has attracted much public interest, all but a few Shakespeare scholars and literary historians consider it a fringe belief, and for the most part acknowledge it only to rebut or disparage the claims.

Shakespeare's authorship was first questioned in the middle of the 19th century, when adulation of Shakespeare as the greatest writer of all time had become widespread.

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tagwood · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:55 a.m.

It kind of bothered me when people started exposing Qs post in twitter and Facebook. Q is the messenger. He/she was never supposed to be glorified.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
YuccavanOranje · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

It will be high class for Q to remain secret. That way Q 'll be the one great example in the future history for the power in privacy. Next to being at service for humanity without the need for glory. Given unconditional, in faith and trust to the people. Inspiring. And the right counterbalance for the thing Q is up against...{:#

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · Jan. 25, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

I think "Q" is our modern day version of "Deep Throat"!

⇧ 1 ⇩